Ant-Man Ant-man's reviews thread

I just got back from watching it with the family. It was a really fun and different movie, liked it a lot more than I was expecting. The entire cast did a great job. The movie slowed down a little in the middle but it picked up speed in the 3rd act.

Another good product by Marvel Studios. 8/10
 
I'd give it a B+. Rudd, Douglas, and Pena were the best parts for me. I felt the first 25 minutes or so dragged, as is often the case with origin films. Stoll's villain was generic, but he was no worse than other MCU villains . The fx effects and action scenes were fun.

Some of the characterizations like Hope and Lang's ex's , cop Husband weren't entirely satisfactory for me. In particular, I felt the cop should be a more of a sympathetic character given the circumstances he was in, who the audience could root for just as easily as Scott. But instead he came of as kinda a jerk to me, and kinda the typical jerky new bf role in rom-coms. It may have been the actor just didn't sit well with me .

Other than that though , a fun film . I'd put it up with the first Thor .
 
The new fiance cop thing, very much seemed like an Edgar Wright bit left in the script. I agree it was an unnecessary element, that they probably should have dropped entirely. The only bit I liked with him was at the very end at the dinner table.
 
For me, it was pretty meh. Typical paint-by-the-numbers film-making as of late.

- Getting Scott to be AntMan was quite convoluted and contrived. Hank, being rich, could've just paid a skilled thief to do the heist for him instead of going through all that trouble of recruiting Scott.

- Being part of the MCU, this film is saddled by its obligation to remind viewers of this fact. Mentions of the Avengers and even cameos are shoehorned without any real purpose. The obligatory end credit scene fell flat. Oooh Civil War is next!

- The stakes didn't feel all that high. The mission basically was to stop a sales transaction. Sure the weapon was being sold to Hydra, but after TWS, one would think that Hydra would not need to buy the Yellowjacket as they could just always hack Cross and steal his IP.

- The climax was pretty tame, harmless and quite jokey. Nothing nw that haven't been shown tv spots.
 
Last edited:
Really wanted to love this, but I thought the effects were about the only thing that was really exceptional about it. They were rather awe-inspiring.

But everything else was just so, so generic (IMO).

The three main characters were all just a collection of cliches (overprotective father, daughter chafing against said father's protection, guy who just wants to do right by his daughter, etc.) with very little else to distinguish their personalities. Just bland characters featured in what I think is the weakest MCU script since probably "The Incredible Hulk."

As an example, after Scott said, "My days of breaking into places and stealing **** are over," did anybody not know *exactly* what the next line out of Hank Pym's mouth was going to be? Just so much telegraphed humor like that and going for the obvious joke. Most of it fell flat for me.
 
How does Bobby Cannavale's character [BLACKOUT]end up in that house right after the briefcase sequence?![/BLACKOUT]
 
I just got back from seeing it and I have to admit it was better than I thought it would be.The effects were great as were the fight scenes, but there was one thing I just can't forgive this film for.

They didn't have to kill Antony!! Why!!!!! Dammit, he was my favorite ant.
 
Last edited:
I just got back from seeing it and I have to admit it was better than I thought it would be.The effects were great as were the fight scenes, but there was one thing I just can't forgive this film for.

They didn't have to kill Antony!! Why!!!!! Dammit, he was my favorite ant.

You might wanna spoiler-tag that.
 
I loved Ant-Man, it was definitely a lot better than expected and it had a much different feel to the typical superhero film. I loved they incorporated the comic book storyline Marvel Premiere #47 - To Steal an Ant-Man! love the casting Rudd, Douglas & Lilly worked great as an ensemble. I like the visuals used to showcase shrinking, we've come along way since "Honey I shrunk the kids." I love the cameo's by Peggy, Stark & even Falcon.

the little easter eggs and a new step to MCU post Avengers make me very excited for Spider-Man.
 
rmdSx.gif
 
I liked it. It definitely feels more like a phase 1 film because the scale is so much smaller, not that that's a bad thing. The first act was a little slow, but the effects of de-aging Michael Douglas were amazing. They've come a long way from the prologue of X-3 when they did the same for Xavier and Magneto. The third act was pure fun and amazing. The effects were great and the fight scenes were really innovative. Cross was a great villain. He actually had complexity for me and Stoll brought a lot to the role. I'm really hoping Wasp shows up in Civil War even though the actress wasn't listed. We need more strong female heroes.
 
Sorry, I apologize. I thought you were quoting the video review post. When you said check it, I assumed you meant just look at that post again. Sorry.
 
Non-spoiler review

I went into this feeling fairly hyped with high expectations with the growing buzz. I liked what I was hearing about the movie, and was prepared for good things.

Now this won't apply for everyone, but it does me. As much as it pained me, I think going in, some of the TV spots definitely spoiled too many of those action/effects laden set pieces I'd grown accustomed to seeing in various segments and iterations. Going in blind would have had me staring A LOT more in wonder at some of these creative and very original looking concepts that we get to see frequently once Rudd's Scott Lang finally dons his suit. Frankly, a lot of those major scenes we have seen more than enough of. But it doesn't take away from them being quite an achievement visually and creatively all the same.

Peyton was certainly correct in his interviews; there are visuals we've never seen done before ever in this movie and for that alone you have to give props to Marvel for trying something different with this.

As to the tone, I went in expecting to have a few more belly laughs than I did actually, almost like an out and out comedy based on how Peyton himself has described things. For me, I laughed at fewer points than I did Guardians, but AGAIN, some of the TV spots and preview footage spoiled some of those laughs and I wonder whether an unspoiled viewing might have affected that. For me it felt more along the lines of Iron Man as in action packed with some humorous overtones scattered through. The obvious comedy coming from Michael Pena's character. So I wouldn't go in anticipating an out and out comedy necessarily, more an action movie with humour scattered with a few lighter moments, largely as a by-product of Pená's little quips and jibes.

The cast performances were uniformly good to great especially Michael Douglas who played things mostly straight. Likewise Evangeline's Hope was played with some charm, which grew as she got more comfortable with the idea of Scott Lang and his own set of skills. There is a scene between her and Michael Douglas that was very emotional, and then offset with some comedy which I felt worked nicely. Rudd was also playing fairly straight, I didn't find as much comic relief from him as I might have expected given some of the buzz, however a few great scenes did highlight his comic chops. For me though this was more an expression of Rudd playing serious. Like his scenes with his daughter, or reminiscing his daughter.

In all I found it quite a fun ride, it seemed to service what it was setting out for. The now much-hyped cameo scene was great, there was a lot more to it than I had anticipated. Again, it would have been nice to have been more surprised.

I saw the 3D showing, and although there were spots where this obviously worked well, I don't believe you need to see this in 3D, at least not in the same way I would recommend Guardians. For me, Guardians has become a benchmark for good use of the 3D, and I think Ant-Man is serviceable but 2D would be just fine here.

7/10 is about right for the movie, I went in with high expectations, so this is a pretty good score I think. I largely agree with it's current aggregated percentage standing on RT.
 
Last edited:
Non-spoiler review

I went into this feeling fairly hyped with high expectations with the growing buzz. I liked what I was hearing about the movie, and was prepared for good things.

Now this won't apply for everyone, but it does me. As much as it pained me, I think going in, some of the TV spots definitely spoiled too many of those action/effects laden set pieces I'd grown accustomed to seeing in various segments and iterations. Going in blind would have had me staring A LOT more in wonder at some of these creative and very original looking concepts that we get to see frequently once Rudd's Scott Lang finally dons his suit. Frankly, a lot of those major scenes we have seen more than enough of. But it doesn't take away from them being quite an achievement visually and creatively all the same.

Peyton was certainly correct in his interviews; there are visuals we've never seen done before ever in this movie and for that alone you have to give props to Marvel for trying something different with this.

As to the tone, I went in expecting to have a few more belly laughs than I did actually, almost like an out and out comedy based on how Peyton himself has described things. For me, I laughed at fewer points than I did Guardians, but AGAIN, some of the TV spots and preview footage spoiled some of those laughs and I wonder whether an unspoiled viewing might have affected that. For me it felt more along the lines of Iron Man as in action packed with some humorous overtones scattered through. The obvious comedy coming from Michael Pena's character. So I wouldn't go in anticipating an out and out comedy necessarily, more an action movie with humour scattered with a few lighter moments, largely as a by-product of Pená's little quips and jibes.

The cast performances were uniformly good to great especially Michael Douglas who played things mostly straight. Likewise Evangeline's Hope was played with some charm, which grew as she got more comfortable with the idea of Scott Lang and his own set of skills. Rudd was also playing fairly straight, I didn't find as much comic relief from him as I might have expected given some of the buzz, however a few great scenes did highlight his comic chops. For me though this was more an expression of Rudd playing serious. Like his scenes with his daughter, or reminiscing his daughter. There is a scene between her and Michael Douglas that was very emotional, and then offset with some comedy which I felt worked nicely.

In all I found it quite a fun ride, it seemed to service what it was setting out for. The now much-hyped cameo scene was great, there was a lot more to it than I had anticipated. Again, it would have been nice to have been more surprised.

I saw the 3D showing, and although there were spots where this obviously worked well, I don't believe you need to see this in 3D, at least not in the same way I would recommend Guardians. For me, Guardians has become a benchmark for good use of the 3D, and I think Ant-Man is serviceable but 2D would be just fine here.

7/10 is about right for the movie, I went in with high expectations, so this is a pretty good score I think. I largely agree with it's current aggregated percentage standing on RT.

I actually didn't think Guardians looked all that great in 3D. I'm a little nervous about how it might work in Ant-Man.
 
Another average movie from Marvel Studios. I liked the creative flourishes leftover from Edgar Wright (like all the secondhand storyteller flashbacks and a few of the action sequences with their tongue in their cheek while on a toy train set, etc.). But it was otherwise a generic superhero film. Yawn. 6/10

Marvel, do better.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"