The Leaguer
Avenger
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2004
- Messages
- 13,801
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I like him personally.
Shut the f*** up.Darthphere said:I love Hal Jordan.
The Leaguer said:Shut the f*** up.
The Batman said:One thing I like about marvel is that, when they want to make a character more popular, they dont replace him, they actually stick with whoever's in the mantle and they try to build them. Moon Knight, Ms. Marvel, Ghost Rider, and Spider-Woman are good examples. Imagine Marvel saying they were gonna be more intergal to the Mu, and THEN they replace them with some newbie.
SpideyInATree said:I guess this is where we differ on things. The appeal of DC and the characters is that they do treat some of the heroes with "mantles" and it gets passed on every now and again. I actually really like that about a lot of DC characters. I actually wish Marvel would do that with some of their characters.
They tried it with Spider-Man, in a really insane type of way, and that didn't work out. Well, that's because most Spider-Man fans are in a deep rooted relationship with Peter Parker and not even an exact replica of Peter Parker can take his place, haha.![]()
Darthphere said:Yeah, because the Supes and Batman fans will love to see Bruce and Clark step down and pass the mantle off.
SpideyInATree said:I'm a long time Batman fan and I'd love to see Batman pass his mantle on to either Dick Grayson or, eventually, Tim Drake.
Darthphere said:Yeah, but really, youre in the minority on that one.
SpideyInATree said:I'm in the minority on a lot of things around here, so I'm used to it.
Darthphere said:You like Sins Past dont you?![]()
The Batman said:Whenever DC wants to make a character popular....they kill or get rid of whoever's holding the mantle at the moment. Ray Palmer, Orin, Ronnie Raymond, Cassandra Cain, Ted Kord, and Ray Terill are current examples of this tactic. What was so wrong with these characters that they needed replacing? Most of the stories told with the new guys in the mantle could probably be told with the predecessors, and hell, these new guys arent setting the world on fire anyway. One thing I like about marvel is that, when they want to make a character more popular, they dont replace him, they actually stick with whoever's in the mantle and they try to build them. Moon Knight, Ms. Marvel, Ghost Rider, and Spider-Woman are good examples. Imagine Marvel saying they were gonna be more intergal to the Mu, and THEN they replace them with some newbie.
It feels like DC has only three first class heroes: Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman. With Marvel, you can actually feel an effort to make many of their characters top sellers. Moon Knight, Ms. Marvel, Daredevil, Captain America, etc. Have all had their profile raised in the past few years due to marvel giving those characters some good writers and hype. Only GL feels like hes grown more popular as a character.
BrianWilly said:For every instance of DC treating its characters badly, there are just as many instances, if not more, of DC treating its characters with the utmost respect and appreciation. That goes for Marvel as well.
Connor Hawke or Kyle Rayner or Wally West are just a few examples of legacy characters ending up as triumphant success stories. Yes there are the unfortunate casualties and the flat-out "WTF WERE YOU THINKING???!!!!?" events, and we all have different opinions on just what is the fitting direction for these characters to go in, but I'd say the amount of good they're doing at least justifies the mistakes made along the way.
BrianWilly said:Y'all think I'm happy about Linda Danvers being retconned out of existence so that Kara ****e-El can suck the proverbial Silver Age fanboy dick? There's shtty things happening yes and I'd be the first to admit this, I'm just saying DC has respect for a lot of characters outside of the Trinity and any single one of us could name dozens of examples of this.