...if the rating was automatic based on 6/10 being fresh (for argument sake)... Then a critic who would have rated a movie 6/10 with a rotten score will just give it a 5.5/10 to make it rotten.
The ultimate purpose of a fresh or rotten tomato is to recommend a movie or not. The grey area is that 6/10 spot. You could rate a movie 6/10 and not like it or not want to recommend it to others. You could also see a "turn off your brain" action film that you rated 6/10 but thought it was enjoyable enough to recommend others to see it. I get why they leave the flexibility there, but I wouldn't say the tomato meter is inaccurate because of that. Nobody writes a review with the intention of a rotten rating, but when enters a 6/10 and sees a fresh tomato come up leaves it. They'd change it to 5.5 or even 5.9 if they wanted to show it was borderline.Yes, they might. And they should. If a critic is that concerned about how his review will be immortalized on RT, he should adjust his original rating accordingly. Problem solved. It seems to me, it’s in RT’s own interest to have the appearance of consistency. And a 6/10 score that’s - nevertheless - recorded as “rotten” is inconsistent.
If they try MM, they will probably have to throw in other heroes, too.Now you’re talking.
WB need to start swinging for the fences with the lesser known characters. Put them in appropriate genre bending movies, and let them shine with the audience individually... instead of cramming them all in one movie where nobody gets chance to shine.
Yeah, Aquaman movie is promoting social awareness about issues that Oceans face. The movie also had an ecological message.
Aquaman movie has done more for Ocean ecosystem awareness than any other Marvel or DC movie.
The environmental element of this movie is one of the things that I found disappointing. Not because they didn't bring it up, but because of how they addressed it.
What I appreciated was it being a part of Orm's motivation and the way it factored into his first aggressive steps toward the surface. The visuals at two different parts of the movie illustrating the damage surface dwellers had done were also a nice touch. Having Mera and Arthur discuss it further worked for me as well. But it was all talk. It didn't go anywhere.
Arthur, as this bridge between land and sea who fights for both, doesn't ultimately do anything about the environment or serve as a bridge in any way (he protects both sides but doesn't reconcile the two). One can assume he will eventually, but since it was such a huge plot point at the start of the film, not returning to it in any significant way felt off. As a superhero and leader, to protect land and sea, he has to do more than just kick ass and speak to animals. He has to discuss these issues with regular citizens of both worlds and with their leaders. I also wasn't sure how I felt about Atlantis acting as the arbiters of environmental conservation given we don't know how their advanced society deals with its waste (trash, energy, etc.) and we see them using various sea creatures as beasts of burden without them being able to consent (only Arthur can talk to them).
So, overall the environmental message came off as half-baked and had less of an impact as a result. Awareness is great. Action is better. Don't get me wrong. I'm about 75% okay with how it was handled. However, where I feel it was lacking did interfere with my appreciation and enthusiasm.
Ahead of the upcoming theatrical release of the highly anticipated superhero action adventure Aquaman, Warner Bros. has partnered with Ocean Conservancy to bring global awareness and inspire volunteerism to its International Coastal Cleanup on Saturday, September 15.
An icon for over 75 years, Aquaman is known by fans of DC Comics as the protector of the oceans and fierce guardian of the entire globe, both land and sea. To further that mission, Warner Bros. Pictures is encouraging movie fans to join volunteers throughout the U.S. and more than 100 countries as they come together to #BeAnOceanHero during the 2018 International Coastal Cleanup.
The message was there and they could have handled it better but not just that, Aquaman movie promotion included tie-ups with other groups that are dedicated to raising awareness about Ocean clean-up and other environmental activities, so movie was involved in many different ways.
Aquaman is Joining Forces with the Ocean Conservancy - Graphic Policy
Join the wave
To be fair, when has an environmental message not been half baked? I don’t know that I’ve ever seen a character offer an actual solution beyond recycling in 80’s movies.
It doesn't need but you would be surprised at the number of people who were looking forward to it that includes, Critics, Marine biologists, Fans and general moviegoers. Thanks to Wan for including it in the movie without sounding preachy.Aquaman was a very fun and entertaining movie.
It didn't really need an environmental message.