These are elite actors. Pace has been on the scene for a long time now and the big movie Star leading man thing HASN'T HAPPENED FOR A REASON. He doesn’t have the rizz.
It’s just there’s just an element to him that is not as magnetic as other leading men like Bale , Pattinson or Keaton. There’s a reason Pace isn’t booking lead roles in huge movies and it’s his lack of charisma and the X factor. He doesn’t have it but he is a great supporting actor.
Complete disagree. Hartnett had genuine charisma and shunned the spotlight when he was picked by Hollywood to be the It boy in the early 00s. Pace never had that opportunity because he just doesn’t have the X factor that makes someone a true star vs being a simply good actor. Pace is not a lead actor in major roles for a reason. He is a good actor but he doesn’t have the X factor that makes someone a star.They’re two different things. We’ve had really strong actors in this role and I’m sorry but going from Pattinson to Pace is a HUGE downgrade.
Considering the history of homophobia in Hollywood and how LGBT actors for decades have been sidelined, blacklisted and overall not given as many opportunities especially as leading men compared to straight actors, saying the reason Lee Pace hasn't gotten as many opportunities is because his "lack of charisma" (which is completely wrong, by the way) seems straight-up ignorant to me, especially considering how his career was on a steady upwards trajectory (Getting an emmy nomination at 29 followied by him working with Spielberg, then with Peter Jackson, and then in the MCU) up until the point in which he came out as gay. Now, that may very well be a coincidence, but honestly knowing how the business worked even until very recently it probably wasn't.
Kevin Conroy wrote a comic about it. Things are better now but do you really think that type of discrimination has disappeared entirely?
Really not seeing it. At all. There’s no intensity behind the eyes.
Well no surprise there wouldn't be "intensity behind the eyes" in those images. You literally showed two images where he's just casually laughing at red carpets.
If you truly did watch Halt and Catch Fire, Foundation and The Falll this argument is the most perplexing to me because the intensity of his eyes is one of the reasons to cast him. He can 100% play intense and tortured absolutely no problem,
you can see it in his eyes.
I mean, it's fine if you don't like him, but saying he doesn't have intensity behind his eyes is just straight up wrong when if anything they're one of his biggest strengths as an actor and have been since The Fall.
We’ve had really strong actors in this role and I’m sorry but going from Pattinson to Pace is a HUGE downgrade.
Same goes for Ackles, Cullen, Bateman, and Cohen.
The only guys that fit the role and have the same level of charisma and elite acting ability are Gosling and Gyllenhaal
You're waaaay too obsessed with star-power IMO What matters the most is whether a specific actor is the best choice for a specific part. If Leonardo Dicaprio came down to the WB lot and told Gunn "cast me as Batman" what Gunn should say is "**** no" because he doesn't fit the part. And I like Gyllenhaal, he's my second choice, but it seems like a bit of a trivial thing to rule people over, especially since by that logic Gyllenhaal would quite literally be the only choice because the odds of Gosling happening are practically non-existant.
Gosling and Gyllenhaal have it but Pace just looks too soft and nice even though he’s in shape and tall. Not intimidating in the slightest, he looks like he’d be fun to hang with.
I'm sorry but I'm just straight-up confused by your "appearance" argument, because that same exact logic can apply more and it's significantly more fitting for Gosling than it'd be for Lee Pace lmao.
I mean... seriously, which incarnation of Batman have you seen that even remotely looks like Gosling? And I know Cohen is not ideal for you either, but which incarnation of Batman have you seen that even remotely looks like him either? Playing the appearance the game over Lee Pace is extremely confusing to me because he literally looks like this:
He's not out of type in any way especially compared to other Batman actors.
If he looked like Matthew Rhys or Jonathan Groff then fine, I could give the argument to you but come on dude. If you don't like him personally that's fine but acting as if he's just so egregiously off what Bruce Wayne's look is, is confusing to me because even if I didn't know anything else about him I could look at him and think "Oh yeah that's Bruce Wayne"
Is it really /that/ hard to imagine this man as an intense brooding playboy CEO that has mentored several orphan children into crime-fighting machines? I don't think it is at all. I mean, at the very least you can say he looks more like Bruce than Michael Keaton and Kilmer did, and about as much as Christian Bale did. He's also not hard to imagine in the cowl /at all/, and we've gone over his physique before as well.
And also, no, it's not the Gunn connection. I've thought Lee was a great pick for Batman ever since I watched Halt and Catch Fire. And I've looked back on the forum on previous fancasting threads and a lot of other people here (like flickchick) have also thought it was well. Every time it was brought up it was well-received. The Gunn connection just makes people like me excited that it may actually happen.
Can I ask a genuine, good-faith question of the Lee Pace advocates? I’m personally not 100% on him for the role (slightly hit or miss for me as an actor), but accepting for the sake of argument that he is the perfect Batman wouldn’t it be preferable to see him play an openly gay Batman-analogue in Midnighter?
No. Having read The Authority comics, Midnighter is a gruff "one beer in one hand, one gun on the other" type of soldier character. He's closer in attitude to something like The Comedian, which is not the type that Lee Pace is at all. You'd need something closer to someone like Jon Bernthal or Jeffrey Dean Morgan for that.
You could make an argument for Apollo but honestly having read the comics I don't think that'd be ideal for him either. Apollo is this mega straight-faced, kinda shallow character that's mostly there to be Midnighter's boyfriend and also a weapon for The Authority, he's probably be more apt for a Tom Brittney-type.
And aside from that, Batman is a way better character than those two, and also a far more exciting pick for Lee.
I know you don't mean bad but I'm also tired of hearing of Apollo or Midnighter in these discussions. It just strikes me as a very specific form of typecasting that does frustrate me a lot since "gay actors can only play gay roles" is in part a line of thinking that has limited the opportunities of a lot of people before. The fact those two roles keep being brought up constantly purely because of Lee's sexuality is kinda tiresome.