Calvin
Muchas smooches
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2003
- Messages
- 18,088
- Reaction score
- 127
- Points
- 73
i have no problem with that but i think that was a MISSION to kill HIM NOT to consider any chance to take him alive...if you going for a KILL MISSION you dont care much about weapons or not...
From Panetta himself: Panetta underscored on Tuesday that Obama had given permission to kill the terror leader: "The authority here was to kill bin Laden," he said. "And obviously, under the rules of engagement, if he had in fact thrown up his hands, surrendered and didn't appear to be representing any kind of threat, then they were to capture him. But they had full authority to kill him."
And also here: Asked about the final confrontation with bin Laden, Panetta said: "I don't think he had a lot of time to say anything." The CIA chief told PBS NewsHour, "It was a firefight going up that compound. ... I think it - this was all split-second action on the part of the SEALs."
Panetta said that bin Laden made "some threatening moves that were made that clearly represented a clear threat to our guys. And that's the reason they fired."