I SEE SPIDEY
Eternal
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2003
- Messages
- 54,611
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 31
I just felt that Boyle was not quite the right director and I was always leery of the Fassbender choice but I gave him a chance because I think he is a great actor. Unfortunately the performance didn't grab me the way I wanted it to.It could have been on HBO. But I'm glad it wasn't. Universal might disagree...
But I actually loved how Boyle's direction mixed with Sorkin's prose. While you're right it ain't Social Network, the way that it was handled felt neither stagey or precious, which strangely HBO's The Newsroom did. I thought Fassbender was great but wasn't too crazy about Winslet ironically enough (that accent was pretty sporadic). I also like how they essentially tried to turn Jobs into a Greek or Shakespearian figure in terms of hubris and folly.
Historically accurate? Probably not, but it is nice to have something that ambitious for adults in theaters.
I can understand how Winslet's, not good, accent could hinder the performance in many people's eyes. To me if the acting is on point I forgive suspect accent work and I felt that her overall performance was really good.
If I wanted to watch a historically accurate account I would watch a documentary. I have always been fine with films about historical figures not being 100% accurate as long as the film works as a film. I thought the product launch structure was interesting but there is something so small about the film and that feels disappointing to me. Mind you I didn't want some big explosions or anything, I wanted my fireworks and intrigue done in the low key way that it should be done in dramas. The characters and story aren't as enthralling as I want them to be. I would have to watch it again to go in depth on why I didn't love the film.
I give the movie credit for going for that interesting 3 act structure but I just wish I would have walked away with more than "it's pretty good" as a reaction.
Sorry for being off topic fellas.