A friendly reminder to our users, please make sure your account is safe. Make sure you update your password and have an active email address to recover or change your password.
It scares me when people speak against recasting. I don't want Spider-Man to get his villains stolen by Miles. I want to see Peter Parker fight all his villains and deal with a full love life just like in the comics and cartoons, and that will need a James Bond policy where you release the next film after two years whether it's the same actor or new.
Well, that's not petty, is it? How dare there be a Marvel property put out by a company that's not in the MCU. Blasphemy!
I mean, hey, Sony does have access to the characters. Why not do something with them? I mean, if their universe does well, what's the problem? All the more reason for them to keep on going.
These characters are bigger than the actors that play them. Recasting is inevitable and perfectly normal.
Recasting is perfectly normal between separate series, in animated/cgi roles or in movies starring characters named Bond. Outside of those circumstances, it is most definitely not normal, though it does happen occasionally. Sometimes it even works. But why take the risk when its completely unnecessary and you have access to a separate but related character who can carry the story forward in fresh, new ways?
Because by that logic, Red Hulk would have been a founding member of the MCU Avengers, with Bruce Banner disappearing forever.
Cause they suck with the Spider-Man property?????
You always believed that or just after Spider-Man Homecoming was released by comparison? Seems there's a lot of love for the Raimi films and even the first Amazing film.
But sure, it's Sony, so I guess they don't deserve credit for that. At least according to some folks here.
We don't get more than 3 Iron Man movies and 3 Captain America movies but we are gonna expect 11 Spider-man movies? Even if they did one every 2 years, he'd be 40+ by the final film.
We don't get more than 3 Iron Man movies and 3 Captain America movies but we are gonna expect 11 Spider-man movies?
Did I say that? No. After Spider-Man 2 Sony stepped in and messed up 3 rebooted prematurely with a sub par movie and delivered a rushed world building movie. So yea they are bad with the property. Never said homecoming was great but Sony is worse. Venom isnt looking to promising either imo. And raimi was in charge of the first two movies thats why they are great.
Only a handful of people like the asm series
It's insane that we're even talking about Tom looking too old when the guy is barely out of his teens at this point. He can and should play the part for another 12 years
Of course they're not going to do EVERY single storyline from the comics. That would be impossible. If they set up Sinister Six for movie 3 then that's (Vulture, Shocker, Scorpion, Mysterio, likely Doc Ock and Kraven) the second trilogy could focus on the Goblins saga, Lizard and maybe a gang war (GG, Hobgoblin, Curt, Hammerhead and Tombstone) and Daily Bugle.Yes, but is 12 years enough to do Peter Parker justice at a rate of one film every other year?
He graduates high school in 2021 and should have encountered only 4-5 villains (Vulture, Shocker, Mysterio, Scorpion, ?).
Another trilogy from 2023-27 could cover the Sinister Six, a whole film for Dr. Connors, and a whole film for Doc Ock.
They could and should still be introducing new Ditko villains at the end of the decade (Sandman, Electro) and there'd still be the Symbiote/Eddie Brock, Hobgoblin, the Kingpin...
Homecoming is the clear second best Spidey film IMO behind the Raimi original. Spider-Man 2 is fine, but has annoying contrivances and ultimately the original does everything better to some degree.
I realize Im in the minority, Ive tried to get the S-M2 love glad people do like it significantly better than me though.