Cesar VS Jack

[Superwoman Prime]

 

[Cain]

Way too drastically different interpretations from 2 completely different generations to make a valid comparison. It's like comparing Heath Ledger to Jack Nicholson just cause it's the same character on the surface. So I can't vote.

 

[JokerLedger]

I hate it when people say that because they say that for EVERYTHING. Who cares just vote !

 

[Superwoman Prime]

JokerLedger gets it.

 

[Cain]

Sorry that's the way I am if it's 2 actors playing the same version of one character (Ie: Reeve & Routh or Keaton & Kilmer) that's a different story but not 2 interpretations that were approached differently. Who knows what Romero could've done with a darker Joker or Jack with a campier one that's why.

 

[The Joker]

I never rated Cesar's Joker very highly. He was entertaining to watch, but I never really saw him as The Joker. I know he was based off the campy 40's/50's/60's Joker. So, it was a valid portrayl. But it just never really felt like Joker much to me.

Jack Nicholson was fantastic. I adored every second of him. So, he gets my vote.

 

[Lex Luthor]

I personally like both Ceaser, and Jack's portrayals as the Clown Prince of Crime. Though I have to admit that Jack's Joker left much more of an impression on me during the summer of 1989 and beyond, so Nicholson it is.

 

[Two-Face]

I liked Romero's Joker but Jack IS the Joker.


Joker: "Jack? Jack is dead, my friend."
[steps into the light]
Joker: "You can call me... Joker."
[Grissom gapes]
Joker: "And as you can see, I'm a lot happier."

 

[jimhorse]

I vote Ceaser. No love for the 'stache? MOUSTACHE JOKER FTW.

 

[Bat Attack]

You can't compare the two. they're completley different portrayls imo. I love them both but read my sig.

 

[Eggyman]

Jack without a shadow of a doubt

'Ahhh, Gotham City. Always brings a smile to my face'

 

[Bat Attack]

Edit!

 

[Carlynn Carnage]

Ceaser

 

[Joker]

You cant compare them. Ceaser was more accurate to the comics at the time than Jack was. But Jack was a better, darker version of the character. It's really asking "which version of this character do you preffer?" not "which actor was better?"

 

[Doctor Baywatch]

Romero put more heart into the performance, so I vote for him.

 

[Punishment]

I cant compare the characters, like i wont be able to compare Ledgers to Nicholsons, they are just different portrayals of a legendary character, but Jack is better than romero simply because Romero's Joker wasnt the crime prince of crime that i know and love( At least Nicholson and Ledger dont have moustaches )

 

[Finlandman]

Romero had a better laugh and his plot's were perfect. '' Now I'll turn the water of Gotham City into a red goo!"

 

[BurningBallroom]

I hate to compare, but I guess I'll go for Jack.

 

[Kevin Roegele]

Cesar Romero. He is exactly right physically, he sounds right, his laugh is wonderful. He is the Joker stepped right off the page.

But wait - he's not 'dark', therefore he sucks.

 

[El Payaso]

Cesar Romero. He is exactly right physically, he sounds right, his laugh is wonderful. He is the Joker stepped right off the page.

But wait - he's not 'dark', therefore he sucks.

The funny bit is how many fans are starting to say the exact same thing about Jack (when contrasted to Ledger.)

 

[LegendaryCaleb]

No doubt about it....Jack...

 

[StylishHokie21]

Jack Nicholson of course. That's not to say Romero was bad. He was fun to watch, but I prefer the Joker I grew up with.

 

[Kevin Roegele]

The funny bit is how many fans are starting to say the exact same thing about Jack (when contrasted to Ledger.)

Everything is relative.

 

[MrSmith1114]

I'm going with Jack Nicholson's Joker.

His version was more sinister, and he looked more like the Joker than Cesar did.

 

[30+Dark]

Jack Nicholson, by many miles. It seems unfair to compare them.Romero was great for the tv show though.