Cop killer on the run calls out to celebs

I wouldn't be too sure about that. It seems the media's take is treated like scripture for the most part.

Ah so in the spirit of rebellion, you choose to look at it differently? Dang, if this was only the 60's!!



That's naive, immature, and can ultimately be dangerous. Again, if you're just trolling or what have you, sorry, ain't workin' for you. If you're serious, then I would strongly recommend that a mod who knows your real identity be alerted to a possible danger, and that you get help. So if there really is something positive to get out of this, it's that you're stopped for being a moron, or for being a possible (and ultimately pretty typical) danger.





You can go ahead and choose which one of those you like better....and thanks for the heads-up.
 
Every terrorist thinks their cause is justified. But they don't call it terrorism.

One man's revolutionary could be considered another man's terrorist. It can depend on the side of the fence you're on and the acts of "terror" being used.

During the American Revolutionary War, I'm sure there were many on the colony's side who were considered terrorists or evil rebels and their acts could probably be seen as justifiable either at the time or at this point.
 
Last edited:
Ah so in the spirit of rebellion, you choose to look at it differently? Dang, if this was only the 60's!!



That's naive, immature, and can ultimately be dangerous. Again, if you're just trolling or what have you, sorry, ain't workin' for you. If you're serious, then I would strongly recommend that a mod who knows your real identity be alerted to a possible danger, and that you get help. So if there really is something positive to get out of this, it's that you're stopped for being a moron, or for being a possible (and ultimately pretty typical) danger.





You can go ahead and choose which one of those you like better....and thanks for the heads-up.

Oh so now you want to treat me like a terrorist for simply expressing an alternative POV to the hive mind you call a free society.

You're perfectly suited for the Chinese government. Ever think of applying for job?
 
Oh so now you want to treat me like a terrorist for simply expressing an alternative POV to the hive mind you call a free society.

tinfoil%2Bhat.jpg
 
One man's revolutionary could be considered another man's terrorist. It can depend on the side of the fence you're on and the acts of "terror" being used.

During the American Revolutionary War, I'm sure there were many on the colony's side who were considered terrorists or evil rebels and their acts could probably be seen as justifiable either at the time or at this point.

Good thing they didn't have the internet back then.

Kal Mart would've reported the Son's of Liberty to the King's homeland security.
 
Oh so now you want to treat me like a terrorist for simply expressing an alternative POV to the hive mind you call a free society.
No, I honestly don't believe you have the balls or even the smarts to be a terrorist. Immature and naive troll is probably more like it.


Heck...if a terrorist is reading this, he's probably laughing at you now too.


You're perfectly suited for the Chinese government. Ever think of applying for job?

And how would you know that?
















Take your time. :cwink:


Try reading a book or something.
 
Find the crazy person in this pic.

awake.jpg


Comparing Nazi Germany to people who believe Dorner's actions are unjustified? But wait, you already told us you don't believe there's any circumstance where the murder of innocents is justifiable.

Your argument is all over the place. The reason no one agrees with you here isn't because of some totalitarian government and warped population, it's not that complex. The reason no one agrees with you is because Dorner isn't anything more than a plain old everyday, run of the mill murderer and you're trying to give his actions some sort of merit -of which there is none.
 
Hey! You know what I'm seeing here? I'm seeing MessiahDecoy123 being polite and trying to have civil discussion while others question his mental stability and worth as a person just because he has a different view point. The hell is wrong with you people?

I do not agree with MessiahDecoy123's take on several things. Some of his beliefs might be unconventional and questionable, but being a jerk to him doesn't make you a better person, even if you're right. It makes you an a**hole.

So I have an idea, try having constructive conversation instead of using the internet anonymity as an excuse to berate those with different views. And if you can't do that, then keep your dickish comments to yourself.
 
Last edited:
Hey! You know what I'm seeing here? I'm seeing MessiahDecoy123 being polite and trying to have civil discussion while others question his mental stability and worth as a person just because he has a different view point. The hell is wrong with you people?

I do not agree with MessiahDecoy123's take on several things. Some of his beliefs might be unconventional and questionable, but being a jerk to him doesn't make you a better person, even if you're right. I makes you an a**hole.

No, what you're seeing is a complete lack of understanding on his part on what two sides are before even approaching an open argument. There's no sensibility or rationality in it, the outlook is morally indecent, and to disregard that is offensive and impolite. People are just responding in a language that he seems to understand better....and frankly, it worked.

Someone else who actually is discussing in a mature and sensible manner is, conversely, being responded to appropriately.
 
It's more fun to be an ******* though, just saying.
 
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

Can I use that one?

Cause that's the reason this is bound to remain a divisive issue. I wouldn't have it any other way. People need to realize there may come a time when a person labeled a domestic terrorist may have similar moral reasoning as a large segment of the American population.

Because it will happen again and next time you may be the one who sees a "terrorist" as a potential freedom fighter.

and the government is preparing for it.

Utter nonsense, You are trying to turn this into something it isn't. Some psycho is killing people over some beef he has, nothing more. You on the other hand seem to have some sisue with cops or maybe more specifically the LAPD and are trying to skew this into a direction that no one but you is buying. Either that or you are trolling or conducting some pseudo intellectual science experiment, whatever it is you are failing badly.
 
No, I honestly don't believe you have the balls or even the smarts to be a terrorist. Immature and naive troll is probably more like it.

Do you have the smarts are balls to be a terrorist?

and why isn't your constant instigation with childish insults considered trolling?
 
Hey! You know what I'm seeing here? I'm seeing MessiahDecoy123 being polite and trying to have civil discussion while others question his mental stability and worth as a person just because he has a different view point. The hell is wrong with you people?

I do not agree with MessiahDecoy123's take on several things. Some of his beliefs might be unconventional and questionable, but being a jerk to him doesn't make you a better person, even if you're right. It makes you an a**hole.

So I have an idea, try having constructive conversation instead of using the internet anonymity as an excuse to berate those with different views. And if you can't do that, then keep your dickish comments to yourself.

Get off your high horse, he's spouted more nonsense than an a alcoholic on a Jack Daniels drip. You calling other people names just makes you a hypocrite as well.
 
But it's so nice up here! and I spent some good time looking for a horse this tall :mad:...in any case I'm interested to see what comes out of this whole situation next. Hopefully Dorner is brought down and something actually constructive can be made of what he's done as it relates to LAPD corruption...if it's really even remotely close to as horrible as he claims it is.
 
Last edited:
I'm trying to follow the story. So basically he filed and complained about assaults and racism in the LAPD and he was fired. Then supposedly he kills the daughter of someone in the force. Now he is targeting their families and still at large, is that the basicness of it?
 
No, what you're seeing is a complete lack of understanding on his part on what two sides are before even approaching an open argument. There's no sensibility or rationality in it, the outlook is morally indecent, and to disregard that is offensive and impolite. People are just responding in a language that he seems to understand better....and frankly, it worked.
.

Logic works.

Insults just make you a bully.

But you always revert to these tactics then try to justify them with eloquent nonsense.
 
Utter nonsense, You are trying to turn this into something it isn't. Some psycho is killing people over some beef he has, nothing more. You on the other hand seem to have some sisue with cops or maybe more specifically the LAPD and are trying to skew this into a direction that no one but you is buying. Either that or you are trolling or conducting some pseudo intellectual science experiment, whatever it is you are failing badly.

On a more serious note...it's more important than ever to make the distinction between activism, which we can all imagine is fueled by merit.....and terrorism which as a concept has no merit whatsoever.

Now...if said individual actually believes that what they are doing is actually activism and not terrorism, or if it's somehow justified...then they are either insane or brainwashed into thinking that way by someone using that terrorism as a tool. We have to distinguish terrorism as something that is innately evil, and that act of evil override whatever sympathy over what may have fueled it. It is the absolute wrong action to take for any circumstance, and more importantly, it has to be understood as the wrong path. The great tragedy...moreso than individuals who feel compelled through their own singular issues...is in those nurtured and influenced into it by those from whom they seek leadership and inspiration. That saddens, but in no way do I sympathize with the action taken.
 
But it's so nice up here! and I spent some good time looking for a horse this tall :mad:...in any case I'm interested to see what comes out of this whole situation next. Hopefully Dorner is brought down and something actually constructive can be made of what he's done as it relates to LAPD corruption...if it's really even as horrible as he claims to begin with.

Even if what he originally complained about was true it will be ignored as the rantings of a mad man now.
 
Get off your high horse, he's spouted more nonsense than an a alcoholic on a Jack Daniels drip. You calling other people names just makes you a hypocrite as well.

DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMN!

:wow::wow::wow::wow:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"