Critics' Reviews: Discussion

[danoyse]

Oh for the love of god, let's get back on topic.

 

[Ace of Knaves]

Yea, poo flinging isn't really something I wanna talk about, not just before dinner anyway

So is there any more reviews up?

 

[Retroman]

Widescreen Magazine's review (Germany) - 3.5 out 5 stars
Outnow's review (Switzerland) - 5 out 6 stars
Cinema Online (Malaysia) - 4 out 5 stars

 

[danoyse]

Widescreen Magazine's review (Germany) - 3.5 out 5 stars
Outnow's review (Switzerland) - 5 out 6 stars
Cinema Online (Malaysia) - 4 out 5 stars

Nice.

 

[Golgo-13]

Another thing i REALLY disliked:

Spoiler

Escaping the adamantium bonding facility. He cuts an 'X' in the door...pure cheese. . What happened to him simply pushing the door open like they showed in X2..? In fact, for that whole scene, they could have inter-cut footage from parts of the experiment they showed in X2, with the one in Origins to give the feeling of more continuity..

 

[Canemacar]

Wouldn't the middle pieces of the x fall out since nothing is holding them up? BTW, anyone speak German, Swiss, or Malasian?

 

[Ace of Knaves]

They did, that's how he got out.

 

[Nathan]

I speak german.

 

[CelticPredator]

5 out of 6? The hell kinda review system is that?

This isnt an attack on the fact it's postive...just the fact that it's just down right weird....


"I give it a 3 out of 7....."????

 

[Canemacar]

I speak german.

anything interesting in the article?

5 out of 6? The hell kinda review system is that?

This isnt an attack on the fact it's postive...just the fact that it's just down right weird....
"I give it a 3 out of 7....."????

I give it a 2.1738 out of 3.14159~

 

[Ace of Knaves]

Yea ratings out of 6 is a bit weird to say the least.

 

[CelticPredator]

You do realise that anyone accusing favourable reviews of being from the studio is just exposing their own bitter bias. It looks like you are sitting there wishing for negativity in order to validate your own negativity. Which is a fairly insecure way of existing.

Erm...yeah, I have a bias...but if the movie WAS good...I wouldnt be trashing it.

Now...here's another thing, I said that review just reads like it's fake. Just that review...not everyone who liked it.

Did I call Ace a plant for enjoying it? **** no. Because he isn't.

Did I call you a plant? No...but you could be.



(I keed...I keed. )

 

[CelticPredator]

anything interesting in the article?



I give it a 2.1738 out of 3.14159~

Nah, it's more of a 7/5 out of 14/119

 

[Canemacar]

Nah, it's more of a 7/5 out of 14/119

Overall, i give the movie a (am)n = a*mn = 73^2

Solve for m.

 

[Jick]

So, only good reviews so far?
That's good.t:
Apart from the fans...

 

[CelticPredator]

I give it a Neutron out of a Proton.

 

[Nathan]

anything interesting in the article?

Not much. But I like that the first review acknowledges lack of depth and moral undertones. They also critize that motivations of the characters are barely explored. It shows superficiality that fans already critized in Brett Ratner's X3.

But it still holds great entertainment value.

The 3rd review is in english, you could read that yourself.

 

[neemer5]

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/entertainment/film/277553/X-Men-Origin-Wolverine-12A-stars-Hugh-Jackman.html

 

[_BB_]

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/entertainment/film/277553/X-Men-Origin-Wolverine-12A-stars-Hugh-Jackman.html

I think that was a fair review and he got his bit spot on:

"THE world's three most thankless jobs?...any director who takes on a much-loved comic book franchise. Epic paycheque aside, it's a lose-lose situation. Rework the source material for the mainstream, and you get torn to shreds by the online sunlight-dodgers months before the film's even finished. Try too hard to please the comic book fans, and you could end up with a laughable folly like Watchmen."

 

[JP]

I liked that review^

 

[night0205]

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/ent...-Origin-Wolverine-12A-stars-Hugh-Jackman.html

\

This review is probably what my review will be like, but I haven't seen the final version so idk yet.

 

[Nivek]

" Try too hard to please the comic book fans, and you could end up with a laughable folly like Watchmen."

Whoever said that can rot in hell. Wolverine isn't near Watchmen's league as a film.

 

[Figs]

Whoever said that can rot in hell. Wolverine isn't near Watchmen's league as a film.

Agreed.Laughable folly is a bit much to say if you disliked Watchmen.

 

[Spidey 2007]

Agreed.Laughable folly is a bit much to say if you disliked Watchmen.

Well I dont think he meant it that way...

He was talking about the general audiences point of view... to alot of them, them, Watchmen was a Laughable folly.. and to a lot of us it was "AMAZING"... but Wolverine to the GA is GOOD! and to some of us its terrible... thats what he was trying to say...

There has to be a middle ground achieved somewhere between the GA and Comic fans.. and i guess these are the two extremes.. ha...

 

[Project862006]

Watchmen made a hell of alot more money than i think it would it stands at 181 million world wide atm