Mjolnir Reborn
Blunt Instrument
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2018
- Messages
- 1,989
- Reaction score
- 2,481
- Points
- 103
First of all: bring more clarity to your posts next time so these misunderstandings don’t happen again.
Second of all: I now realize you’re not making an argument based on popularity with your Doom example(which is easy to get confused since this whole thread is about quality and comparing the quality between two different pieces of entertainment to each other, so me along with the poster you were initially arguing with had assumed that to be the case). I mean, It’s hard to imagine anyone would ever bother asking you who is the best Doctor Doom since that is a question usually asked for characters who have had popular/well-liked adaptions(i.e, Batman, Superman, and even the Hulk) there have been no adaptions of the character of any quality(which I guess is a moot point since you’re not arguing from that angle). But even then they would likely ask you who’s the least worst Doom rather than who’s the ‘best’. In theory, yes you could be ask who’s the ‘best’ Doom but when you brought up the point in relation to your response to Joker’s post replying to you about Bale’s Batman it seemed to me you were saying Bale’s Batman can’t be seen as definitive because were essentially saying being judged as ‘best’ could apply to characters who’ve been adapted poorly which caused the misunderstanding( though the way you worded it certainly didn’t help matters of course).
But anyway I’ll stop replying to you now. I don’t want to derail the topic. I expect another response but I won’t even bother replying.
You have no room to talk about clarity when you didn't even try to explain your objection to the example. That is a hypocritical attitude towards it.
Your stance doesn't exactly get better as I now know exactly why the misunderstanding happened, as I deliberately re-explained things to you in my last post by just repeating things I had already said, as a test. Since you got it now it's apparently not the explanation that's wrong, meaning that it has to be you that didn't bother to read what I had written before.
As for "which is best" vs "which is the least bad", both are relative questions that will result in the same answers. The structure of them means that any possible implication of the general quality of the choices will be made by the enquirer, not by the answerer (unless he makes additional statements with his answer, of course). Important distinctions when communicating. I've also seen people ask "which of these are the best" out of poor options tons of times, so it's hardly an uncommon thing.
I have no idea why you would think my point was that Bale can't be seen as definitive when I've written that the issue is subjective three times. It seems to be a new trend in the thread to ignore things stated multiple times.


