DC has their film logo, Marvel has theirs...should Image Comics get one?

terry78

My name is Stefan, sweet thang
Joined
Mar 8, 2004
Messages
88,381
Reaction score
8,384
Points
203
If they ever choose to basically put all their properties on screen, should they create an Image Comics films studio logo for movies based on Top Cow, Cliffhanger, and other books? Or are they such a mish-mash it wouldn't even matter?
 
Any comic company should make a logo to put on their. Its their stuff afterall.
 
I think Image should become a viable Hollywood property before such a thing is even open for discussion.
 
What is the point of this thread? Both Marvel & DC just use their regular logos.
 
Do mean studio rather than logo?
 
What is the point of this thread? Both Marvel & DC just use their regular logos.

At the beginning of every Marvel or DC movie, that animated logo that showcases the studio. Should Image start doing that as well if any of that **** gets off the ground, is what I'm asking.
 
Does it matter? Besides, there aren't any Image movies in the works.
 
Does it matter? Besides, there aren't any Image movies in the works.

Yeah, it does matter if they start bringing Darkness, Witchblade, etc. to the screen. This is just theoretically speaking.
 
I know Witchblade is in the works, but is that still an Image property?
 
Dark Horse should have one, but I figure that they're too cheap to make one
 
Yeah, it does matter if they start bringing Darkness, Witchblade, etc. to the screen.

If a Witchblade or Darkness movie happens, chances are the logo would be for Top Cow
 
No on account that Image doesn't own the properties that get made. Image doesn't own Spawn. They don't own Witchblade if it gets made. They don't own Bone or Invincible. Therefore, why should they get credit?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"