That's your opinion, but it's still a comparison and contrast all the same which is what a "dick swinging contest" is. You can dress it up by drying to be pseudo-deep all you want but it's not.
It also takes going to my actual profile, like I said fan behavior I've never been to your profile or even care to.
Idk what you post about or what your post history consists of and I also don't care.
Why yes I can, who do I make the autograph out to? Stan?
I'm pretty sure before the whole "Power Tier Placement" thing, I had a hand full of versus threads in the 7 years I've on this site.
You know better than I do since you have some kind of weird fascination with me and all.
Except I have, you just don't want to take your "L".
No, it's not. Not remotely. The idea all comparisons between movies are d*ck swinging contests is ludicrous.
Wait, you are saying you have to be a fan of someone to look at their profile?
But I care to have my facts right. I recall seeing many versus threads from you around the forums. I wanted to clarify that before I said it. So I "put a lot of effort" into that by spending 3 seconds of my life clicking on your thread history.
Would you believe me if I said the surname was Lee?
Yes, that's right. Looking at your thread history fits the description of weird fascination to a tee. Just like looking at someone's profile makes you a fan of them.
Your logic is flawless.
It is when discussing them in a "better or worse" manner.
Yep, that's what I said.
Before the Power Tier Placement I doubt I even made 5 versus threads, not a very small amount in 7 years time.
No, Stan Mitchell from the Eminem song "Stan" which has now become a slang term for an overzealous fan.
You do know fighting is in the very definition of being a superhero right?
This is a superhero website we are on right now.
No, it's not. You discuss them as in which handled what better. That's not a d*ck swinging contest. That's just mature comparison. Comparisons about things with actual depth and substance between movies happen all the time.
Yes, because I didn't create it I merely joined in. Do you pick and choose what you read, if so that's not very becoming of someone who enjoys having their facts in order.You keep mentioning this power tier placement as though making this plethora of threads for some placement list somehow negates what all these versus threads are.
Overzealous fan.....oh my.....I can't even...
We're done here. Thanks for the laugh. I'm half tempted to screencap those comments you made for future reference, because I don't think anyone would believe someone actually said them unless they saw the proof. Even I am still wrapping my head around it lol.
I never said fighting is what defines a superhero, I said it's in it's very definition as superheroes main JOB is literally to fight evil.No, I don't. Criminals/super villains/anti-heroes fight all the time, too. So do boxers. So do martial artists etc. Does that make them superheros? The fact you think fighting is what defines a hero shows me how superficial your thinking is on this topic.
I never said fighting is what defines a superhero, I said it's in it's very definition as superheroes main JOB is literally to fight evil.
You said fighting is the definition of a superhero. It's there in black and white two posts up.
Fighting evil and just saying fighting is apples and oranges. And evil can be fought without even using fisticuffs. Heck we've had superhero movies where the villain wasn't even defeated through physical force.
I said fighting is IN the very definition of a superhero, once again you're skimming and not reading thoroughly.
Not very becoming of a literary man like youself.
You want to play semantics. Ok I can play that way. Fighting is in the definition of a lot of character types who are not superheroes. So your point is still flat.
You do know fighting is in the very definition of being a superhero right?
Exactly. It's ridiculous. There's also a man who flies around in that movie - a man from from space! - and he shoots lasers from his eyes. It's pure nonsense.
God I hate this argument and I see it everywhere. No, just because the film features an alien with superhuman strength, that doesn't give the movie permission to pretend that physics isn't real. Batman's super human strength was unrealistic and had no in-world explanation like Superman did.
The explanation - or at least expectation of exaggerated physics - is inherent in the premise of a comicbook superhero movie.