Deadpool and CW

Torchd

Sidekick
Joined
Jan 8, 2005
Messages
1,664
Reaction score
0
Points
31
What is deadpool's stance in this mess? lol
 
That stinks. Is it by choice or is he forced to?
 
Deadpool has very little qualms about anything. He'd go where the money is.
 
By choice... why does that stink? :confused:
 
I thought Deadpool's stance was very in character...he is being paid by the government to legally hunt down Superheros.....what villain(or anti-hero) wouldn't jump at that offer.:woot:
 
Well its in character as far as money goes but some of the heros are his friends that he is hunting down, but i still wish that he was on caps side.
 
well at least whichever side he ends up on will be a little lighter :)
 
Torchd said:
Well its in character as far as money goes but some of the heros are his friends that he is hunting down

Yeah, but the only people Wade's ever really gone out of his way for are Siryn and Monty. Everyone else is fairly iffy.
 
Torchd said:
Because he is on the wrong side

Not really. I don't think either side, based on philosophy, is wrong. I think both are wrong in terms of how they've reacted to the situation. I/E, very badly.
 
It's weird. The anti-reg guys captured DP around the time that CW #3 went down.
 
Torchd said:
I know but he is/was friends with dp right?

I don't know if I'd call them friends. They tolerate each other and I think there's some respect between the two...at least on the part of Deadpool for Cable.
 
Torchd said:
So what happend to him?

Now I remember, Cable teleported the two of them somewhere after Cable came back with the news that somebody had died during the fight between Cap's guys and Tony's guys. :up:
 
Wow Torchd. I can't be the only one thinking this: buy the dam book!
I know, I know! I shouldn't have said that. I was actually waitin on Darthphere to say it but I took the initutive on myself. :o
 
Colossal Spoons said:
Anti-reg.

I really wouldn't consider Cable to be anti-reg on account that he understands why the government has passed the SHRA and does not fully oppose it. It's the Fifty States Initiative which he opposes.
 
hippie_hunter said:
I really wouldn't consider Cable to be anti-reg on account that he understands why the government has passed the SHRA and does not fully oppose it.

Ok, well we'll create a sub-category for Cable then: "People Tony would have arrested" :p


I really wonder exactly what Cable saw in store for the future though...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"