I just rented Al Gores video on global warming and had to comment.
Do I believe humanity can mess up our environment to the degree that we make our planet actually inhospitable to life? Yes, I do!
You see, like everyone on this forum, I have an opinion. But the world is so complicated today I cant possibly know enough to develop an informed opinion on every issue impacting my life. So, I rely on faith. The question is whom do I believe? The scientist or the politician. The scientist examines and tests data to arrive at studied conclusions. The politician manipulates data to support their self serving conclusions. Its the spin, I believe, that confuses people and prevents intelligent well thought out and executed solutions.
Certainly, Al Gore is a politician, not a scientist. Yet, I believe he is truly serious about protecting the environment. His, is not a politically profitable fight. He would have little hope of winning elections proposing changes that might negatively impact peoples lives. Sadly, he is nothing more than the messenger of doom.
Al Gores message is indeed frightening. I accept the legitimacy of the warnings proffered by the scientific community. The data theyve collected is indeed overwhelming. The planet is certainly getting warmer. Theres no doubt that the ice caps are melting. The data firmly establishes that the atmospheric changes are unprecedented and not part of normal fluctuations. The danger is evident. Yet, there are still many that refuse to believe that we will soon have a day of reckoning.
Why? Why do people choose to accept the words of politicians and industrialists over scientists? I believe its because they fear change. Change can impact their lives taking away that with which theyre familiar. Change can damage industries, lose jobs and lower standards of living. Its far easier to ignore warnings and continue blindly on assuring each other that danger doesnt lurk ahead.
Its so convenient to disbelieve warnings and do nothing. That appears to be what were best at, doing nothing especially if any action might cost us something or cause us to lose something. We can, without any knowledge of the facts, dispute anything we wish. We can find a thousand reasons not to accept the experts opinion. That doesnt make us safe. Even inaction is an action when not moving prevents other things from happening or, as in the case of global warming, causes real events to continue unabated.
So, as Al Gore plainly put it--would you rather have money or the world? Who will you serve: Earth or Benjamin?