Does the Internet ruin comics' stories?

1. Anytime I can talk about comics I'm reading or things about comics that's on my mind AND I can tie it to my podcast, I'm going to do so. I've put my 2 cents into forums that didn't apply to my show, and with that, I didn't mention my show.

2. Since there are 4 of us doing our podcast, we can split up what we buy. My one co-host is our "DC" guy. So he would buy these books anyways. He'll hand them off to me and I'll read them all. Why would I buy the books if he's already buying them? In our past episodes, we reviewed books like Chew, Incognito, Ex-Machina, The Ultimates, Invincible, Secret Invasion, Goon, The Crisis's, etc... I bought Chew, Invincible, and the Goon. One co-host bought Ex-Machina, Ultimates. Another bought the Crisis's and so on. You don't share comics with friends?

BUT! Since I'm a comic newb, I have lots to catch up on. So I've been waiting to read Blackest Night stuff until this month. The whole point of this thread is to see what people think about websites having info right in your face. I should be able to read news of other comics without a spoiler being blasted in my face. My point is that I should be able to choose to CLICK the headline and read the story. This particular case I'm referring to had it right there in front of me!

Another example. Let's say you went to a site about TV shows. You really like the show Dexter. You go to the site to read about Dexter related stuff. But when you go there, the main article says:

"On the show LOST, Jack Shepard is really an ALIEN!" (this is obviously an example and has no truth, just an example).

You didn't click a headline that said "Info on Jack and LOST"... you were blindsided with it. You didn't get the chance to say "I didn't watch LOST yet, so I don't want to read that article."

See what I'm getting at? There should be a level of respect there. That's all I'm saying, but i wanted to get other points of view. I'm open to changing my thought pattern.
 
And to also note. I definitely get the point of trade-waiting / hurting the biz. I just REALLY love having the trade on my shelf. I put an order in at my local shop for the trade of The Anchor. If it's good, I'll probably start getting it monthly. I also decided to start getting Image United monthly.
 
VictorETM said:
So then... The question is: Should comic book websites post a "spoiler" pic on their main page (or other high traffic pages)? Should they show some courtesy to those that haven't read it yet? Or should I just suck it up since I'm letting my friends buy the monthlies?

Well I can understand how you feel...I can't usually afford to buy ALL the comics I want as they come out so I've been "Spoiled" a couple of times by internet sites.

But ultimately, if the comics been out for a while I think it's pretty fair for comics websites to assume that most peple already know what happens in it.
 
I just simply don't read the spoilers but I do pick up the monthly Previews.
 
Trade-Waiter got my Blue Beetle canceled goddamnit.
 
Trade-Waiter got my Blue Beetle canceled goddamnit.


I just really miss the days before the internet when the only bit of news you got about upcoming comics was at the back of the comic telling you in a few short words what was going to happen next issue... then would come the month-long wait...

there was that anticipation of what might or was going to happen next month...

and when that issue finally DID come out, you couldn't wait to race home with it and eagerly put it down and read it...

the internet has taken away the magic of getting those next issues of comics, what with so many various spoilers scattered thruout the net...

the anticipation just really isn't there anymore, especially when you're getting the full lowdown and details of what will happen...

it just isn't the same anymore... the magic of getting new comics just isn't there anymore...
 
I just really miss the days before the internet when the only bit of news you got about upcoming comics was at the back of the comic telling you in a few short words what was going to happen next issue... then would come the month-long wait...

there was that anticipation of what might or was going to happen next month...

and when that issue finally DID come out, you couldn't wait to race home with it and eagerly put it down and read it...

the internet has taken away the magic of getting those next issues of comics, what with so many various spoilers scattered thruout the net...

the anticipation just really isn't there anymore, especially when you're getting the full lowdown and details of what will happen...

it just isn't the same anymore... the magic of getting new comics just isn't there anymore...

I know what you mean...and of course a lot of the time the comics hyped up to such ridiculous levels that you feel let down when you pick it up
 
What an a$$clown :yay:. Redirecting, I would say that the internet does damage comics, but not through spoilers. The ability to read comics for free on the internet is widely available. Comics have trouble as a business venture as is, they don't need free competition. It's not like the movie or television industry which will survive regardless of some downloading. your thoughts, engorge.
 
Marvel and DC superhero comics are a periodical format, period.

Fixed.

The OP has the right to read in whatever format he's comfortable with. That said, one does have to be careful. I read Walking Dead in trades only, so I know not to go into a Walking Dead thread discussing the current storyline. With something like Blackest Night, it's a lot tougher, especially when you also factor in solicitations for future issues (they may not give information away, but they can allude to stuff). It can be done, but it may mean changing your internet habits.
 
It only ruins it when you're foolish enough to decide to hold off on a major story but still visit comic news sites and forums.

I mean, really, what did you expect to happen? Rainbows? Unicorns? Matlock?

lol
 
Fixed.

The OP has the right to read in whatever format he's comfortable with. That said, one does have to be careful. I read Walking Dead in trades only, so I know not to go into a Walking Dead thread discussing the current storyline. With something like Blackest Night, it's a lot tougher, especially when you also factor in solicitations for future issues (they may not give information away, but they can allude to stuff). It can be done, but it may mean changing your internet habits.
Nope, any comic that comes out monthly first and is collected into a trade later is a periodical, whether it's published by Marvel, DC, Dark Horse, Scholastic, Puffin, your pet hamster, or whomever. I completely agree that you and the original poster and everyone else have the right to read the stories in trade form, but you lose the privilege of complaining about spoilers because, frankly, you're choosing to be behind the people who read it monthly, as the creators intended it to be read. If they wanted you to read it in one sitting, they'd release it as a graphic novel from the get-go, like DC is doing with the Earth One stories.
 
Nope, any comic that comes out monthly first and is collected into a trade later is a periodical, whether it's published by Marvel, DC, Dark Horse, Scholastic, Puffin, your pet hamster, or whomever.

That's not what you originally said, though. Twice you said that comics - in general - are a periodical format. Not true. I specified Marvel and DC because the OP mentioned Blackest Night.
 
Semantics. I call a graphic narrative that comes out as a periodical a "comic." I call book-sized graphic narratives that are released whenever "graphic novels." The Walking Dead = comic, Scott Pilgrim = graphic novel. I probably picked it up from manga's larger-format, released-whenever stuff being called "original graphic novels."
 
Last edited:
Understood. :yay: It's just that when I see the word "comics," I think of the medium, not the format.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"