Options is one thing. Entirely normal. Cutting most of the characterization material out of a film and crucial scenes like the banquet and Jessica and Yueh's talk isnt normal. Downright bizarre when its a director that's never ever shown a concern for pacing or runtime.
I think the criticisms towards 2049 gave him a complex. Made him worry about pacing and runtime more than he should have and he tried to get Dune's runtime as low as he could. Resulting in this less than bare minimum theatrical cut. He'll probably never admit it tho.
You hear that, an armada of Star Wars fanboys sizing up your buttocks.The Rogue Cut is the inferior movie to the theatrical cut of DOFP.
I love how dark the Shai Hulud confrontation scene was. Freiser really pushing how dark he can make low light scenes go. Looks incredible in Dolby Vision.
You hear that, an armada of Star Wars fanboys sizing up your buttocks.
Please, hardly my most controversial opinion.
I like Ghost Rider 2 and X-men Apocalypse more than Infinity War...
All this talk of deleted scenes made me look into if any of Villeneuve's past films contained any deleted scenes on the Blu-ray releases and going as far back as Prisoners, none of them have so far. I'm really hoping that we see some of this footage on the home release for Dune but the track record is discouraging.
![]()
Clint Eastwood, Soderberg.I don’t know a single filmmaker who said the edit didn’t change things. I mean, it has to.
I trust the director who shoots a movie knows better than us who haven't even seen those said scenes to know whether they work within the film structure or not.
That's a superficial view of filmmaking and adaptations in general. Not everything that works on a book can translate the same way in a different medium and you can't always know for sure before you shoot or edit a scene. Knowing when to cut parts you love and not trying to just cram everything or to simply please fans of the source material is respectable more than anything.
Why? I think that scene was really well executed. It did justice to Paul and was the most thrilling version of this scene that we've gotten. It also did a lot for Jessica's character and really builds on their relationship, which is a corner stone of the movie. We're missing inner monologue here, you need the type of emotional display we saw here for the audience to care. Jessica standing there emotionless would not have gone over well in a movie adaptation. In fact, I saw an analysis the other day that said that this might be one of the most important additions that makes the movie work.I still think putting so much focus on Jessica during the pain box was a blatant mistake and error.
Is this considered low light? I'm genuinely curious.
Why? I think that scene was really well executed. It did justice to Paul and was the most thrilling version of this scene that we've gotten. It also did a lot for Jessica's character and really builds on their relationship, which is a corner stone of the movie. We're missing inner monologue here, you need the type of emotional display we saw here for the audience to care. Jessica standing there emotionless would not have gone over well in a movie adaptation. In fact, I saw an analysis the other day that said that this might be one of the most important additions that makes the movie work.
Because it was Paul's test. Not Jessica's. It took the focus off of Paul. The editing almost made it seem like Jessica was guiding Paul through it. It wasn't about her being emotionless. We weren't really supposed to see her at all. And the pain box was supposed to make Paul feel like his flesh was being burned off to the very bone.
As someone that didn't read the novel yet I didn't get the feeling that she was guiding him at all. Seeing her reaction to what was going on, despite that she was part in it happening, really elevated the sense of the stakes to me, and at the same time saying a lot about her relationship to Paul and the Sisterhood. Im not sure what the exact nature of the pain, other than just that it's immense pain, is supposed to add to the matter, although I guess it's a nod to the book readers that there is a vision of a burned hand.
All in all I found the scene great.
And it did.And the pain box was supposed to make Paul feel like his flesh was being burned off to the very bone.
And it did.