Man in the Suit
Spookshow International
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2010
- Messages
- 5,614
- Reaction score
- 4,403
- Points
- 103
Scott Pilgrim AKA an editing masterclass.
Scott Pilgrim.
Ah, cheers.
Yeah, I saw about 15 minutes of that once and changed the channel, so...
Scott Pilgrim AKA an editing masterclass.
That hipsters did not understand the irony of, and then thought it was pro hipster.Scott Pilgrim was pretty much a take down of hipsters.
As someone who read the Scott Pilgrim comics, I feel like the barebones adaptation done by the movie would leave a lot of moviegoers finding the story emotionally shallow. Thankfully it was well directed and edited so it was still a fun movie, but pretty much the equivalent of a theme park ride in terms of story and emotional engagement.
This was part of my issues with the film. So the original comic fleshes the characters and story out some more I assume?
I love the books. Read them before the flick came out. I also played the awesome game, and collected both version of the books.As someone who read the Scott Pilgrim comics, I feel like the barebones adaptation done by the movie would leave a lot of moviegoers finding the story emotionally shallow. Thankfully it was well directed and edited so it was still a fun movie, but pretty much the equivalent of a theme park ride in terms of story and emotional engagement.
But I thought the problem was a lot didn't happen in terms of story...See, I didn't like the movie ending. Found it too simple and quick after everything that happened in it. I enjoyed the comic's ending much moreso. I wonder how the original ending with Knives would have played out.
Didn't care for the movie version of the twins either, but it isn't like they were exactly full of depth in the books either.
The movie's a fun abridged version of the comics, but it didn't have enough going for it as its own film in terms of story.
But I thought the problem was a lot didn't happen in terms of story...
I don't know what is simple and quick about it. The entire movie builds to the idea. Of Scott becoming an adult and thus being ready for a legitimate relationship with Ramona. Same for Ramona, who now has a legit chance to have a relationship.
The film is a really strong character study, played with the backdrop of a love story, that kills it in all areas of filmmaking. It has more then enough story (the movie packs so much into each scene in terms of story and character), and it is Edgar Wright's best film imo and one my 10 favorites.
Its Mary Elizabeth Winstead. It was never hard for me to understand that bit.Shows how subjective the film experience is. I felt none of the emotions, thought the characters were mostly *****e cut outs, flat and one note for the most part, especially Romona. We've all had the "thunderbolt" moment with someone we end up head over heels for. I just felt the movie did a really piss poor job of getting across the initial attraction on Scott's part or the continuing longing that pushed him to want to fight for her. In fact, if the film had treated the relationship stuff the way the fight material was handled I'd probably enjoy it more as I would be emotionally disengaged from the get go with no expectations. But it's obvious the film wants you to take the relationship stuff seriously to a point and not understanding the attraction in the relationship, finding most characters off putting ect. I had zero investment in these people, even when they said funny things or did cool stuff.
The film has it's entertainment value in other ways for me but if they offered to remove all memory of the flick because I was running out of hard drive space in the ole' noggin? I'd probably delete it no problem.
In fact given some of what I have heard in reviews for this movie... I'm kinda thinking that my reaction to SP might be mirrored here as well. I hope not, but like I stated before, nothing that I have read or seen so far is blowing up my skirt. I hope that's not the case but... It happens. Not every director whose work I like always lives up to my expectations every time out of the gate.
Its Mary Elizabeth Winstead. It was never hard for me to understand that bit.t:
I always felt they got Scott's abandonment issues across well. Envy scared him, but then it becomes a big question of how much of Scott's character flaws stem from that relationship and how it ended, and how much is it him being a slacker and jerk in general (all his past relationships). But the results of that relationship definitely made him clingy. Little things like the haircut scene more then hint at this.
Also Ramona and Envy mirror one another in their "unattainableness" for Scott, at least early on. What Envy became, where as what he thinks Ramona is (the really cool mystery girl, with the roll blades and colored hair). Impressing Knives is easy. It is not work. Different with Ramona, so by that very nature, fighting for her is a thing Scott would do. This is why Scott earns the Power of Self-Respect when he is actually able to take on Gideon for himself. Its not about Ramona, Knives, Envy or anyone else.
I don't see the movie as them being in a legit relationship or even greatly in love. They both have a ton of baggage and neither is ready for an adult relationship. Scott's not a grown up and Ramona is running from her past, a bit childishly at times. That is what makes the ending work so well imo. They finally can meet on even ground, as whole people, and take that first step into an adult relationship. Something neither has experienced, but something they both earned for themselves through what they go through in the movie.
If Baby Driver is Scott Pilgrim good, it might end up my favorite movie of the year, even with a Rian Johnson Star Wars movie on the way. But if you are erasing bits from your memory, I'd leave this bit. That is some good score:
[YT]nXDxs7It7oI[/YT]
But I thought the problem was a lot didn't happen in terms of story...
That was rather perfect Krypton.