Edios: Playstation 3 is extraordinary

[hippie_hunter]

No they dont. UNTOLD LEGENDS a PS3 exclusive developed by SONY looks almost the same as teh PSP version.

FAIL.

That's because asides from Insomniac, Naughty Dog, Sucker Punch, Santa Monica, and a very few others, Sony's internal game developers suck ass (like Guerilla, 989, Incognito, and the rest)

 

[Manny Calavera]

That's because asides from Sucker Punch and Santa Monica, and no others, Sony's internal game developers suck ass (like Naughty Dog, Insomniac, Guerilla, 989, Incognito, and the rest)

Fixed.

 

[hippie_hunter]

Fixed.

You obviously never played a Naughty Dog or Insomniac game. Crash Bandicoot and Spyro the Dragon kicked ass before Vivendi came in and decided to not only take over the franchises but anally rape them as hard as they can. The first three Jak games and the Ratchet and Clank games were also pretty good

 

[TheBat812]

No, I would write it off as polite PR. The fact is, many have said the exact opposite, and I can look at the specs and judge for myself. Seperating myself from my hatred of you and the kind of idiot gamer you represent, I'm free to post that yes, the ps3 is powerful, and can go toe to toe with the 360 is pretty much any area it wants to, but it's not "the best" or overwhelmingly powerful or anything. Any visual differences will come down to the talent that went into the game.

the fact is you hate sony.

 

[Avalanche]

You obviously never played a Naughty Dog or Insomniac game. Crash Bandicoot and Spyro the Dragon kicked ass before Vivendi came in and decided to not only take over the franchises but anally rape them as hard as they can. The first three Jak games and the Ratchet and Clank games were also pretty good

Agreed. Crash was a pretty defining game back in the day. Spyro, Ratchet and Jak have also received good critical analysis in the past, and Naughty Dog's PS3 game seems to have people excited.

Naughty Dog aren't up there with the best, but they're still proficient.

 

[hippie_hunter]

Agreed. Crash was a pretty defining game back in the day. Spyro, Ratchet and Jak have also received good critical analysis in the past, and Naughty Dog's PS3 game seems to have people excited.

Naughty Dog aren't up there with the best, but they're still proficient.

Like I said, only Naughty Dog, Sucker Punch, Insomniac, and Santa Monica are the good Sony game studios. The rest (Incognito, Guerilla, Cambridge, 989, Sony Bend, SOE, Zipper, and many others) suck major ass

 

[THE LIZARD#1]

I love Insomniac and sucker punch, they are my favorite first party companies. However I've never played a naughty dawg game. Should I be smacked for that?

 

[Avalanche]

Like I said, only Naughty Dog, Sucker Punch, Insomniac, and Santa Monica are the good Sony game studios. The rest (Incognito, Guerilla, Cambridge, 989, Sony Bend, SOE, Zipper, and many others) suck major ass

Cambridge have pulled out a couple of alright games haven't they?

 

[hippie_hunter]

I love Insomniac and sucker punch, they are my favorite first party companies. However I've never played a naughty dawg game. Should I be smacked for that?

Yes, now get over here boy

 

[hippie_hunter]

Cambridge have pulled out a couple of alright games haven't they?

Asides from the incredibly awesome Medevil series, no

And they suck for not making Medievil 3

 

[Avalanche]

Asides from the incredibly awesome Medevil series, no

And they suck for not making Medievil 3

I really liked Primal. Thought it was a damned good game. Ghosthunter was an ok game too.

 

[hippie_hunter]

I hated Primal

 

[hippie_hunter]

Anyways, the point is that Nintendo and Microsoft have much better internal gaming studios (especially Nintendo)

 

[Avalanche]

I hated Primal

A shocking declaration!

But I agree. Sony does have the weakest in house studios.