Evidence Bush knew 9-11 would happen and did nothing.Deal with it non believers.

Was 9/11 an inside job?

  • No

  • Yes


Results are only viewable after voting.
I'll believe the government on this one for one simple reason:
The Government can kill me and get away with it, a bunch of hippies running a website probably can't.

Funny that you mentioned that because many police officers have gone on alex jones radio show saying their familys lives have been threatened if they dont keep quiet.The same pattern follows with this that followed the JFK assassination.People being either bought off to change their original story and if not murdered for telling a story that did not fit their version,are getting intimated with death threats or bought off to change it.
 
By slowly taking away our liberties, our country has slowly degraded into a Police State.

Evidence: The Patriot Act, Patriot Act 2, and The Victory Act.

Evidence: The Guantanamo styled concentration camp in NYC called Pier 57.

Evidence: www.spp.gov - Need I say more?

Evidence: NAFTA Superhighway

We our currently being condition to sacrifice our FREEDOMS for security. Something our forefathers reviled!

"Those that would sacrifice freedom for security will find that they inherit neither." - Benjamin Franklin

Just look up Operation: Northwoods ladies and gentlemen. Our government is capable of attacking it's own people.

well done.:up:
 

correction.Yes 9-11 would have happened if a woman was president.Depends on the woman.If it was Oprah then no it would not have happened,if it was condolozza rice-I think thats how her name is spelled,or Hillary then Yes it would have happened.Hillary is even worse than Bill and god help us all if she ever gets elected.:csad:
 
****, they didn't pay anyone off.. You can't pay off an entire nation like Iran or the entire government of Afganistan with it appearing somewhere, even the Black Budget doesn't have enough money to pay for all that.
 
Funny that you mentioned that because many police officers have gone on alex jones radio show saying their familys lives have been threatened if they dont keep quiet.The same pattern follows with this that followed the JFK assassination.People being either bought off to change their original story and if not murdered for telling a story that did not fit their version,are getting intimated with death threats or bought off to change it.
If that were the case, then wouldn't they be dead?
 
President Bush and his administration saw 9/11 coming and did nothing about it because it would give them the mandate from the American public to do things that otherwise would not be allowed, namely replacing our humanity with patriotism and our freedom with security. Not to mention the pipeline we built across Afghanistan, and the oil fields of Iraq that are being worked by Haliburton.
 
correction.Yes 9-11 would have happened if a woman was president.Depends on the woman.If it was Oprah then no it would not have happened,if it was condolozza rice-I think thats how her name is spelled,or Hillary then Yes it would have happened.Hillary is even worse than Bill and god help us all if she ever gets elected.:csad:
Condoleezza Rice.

So let me get this straight. You claim to have this well-researched, well supported knowledge of the Bush Administrations involvement in 9-11. Yet you cannot even spell the name of top officials in his cabinet correctly.
 
At the most, the Bush Administration is guilty of criminal negligence when it comes to 9-11. It's just a completely unbeleiveable theory.

When Bill O'Reilly owns a 9-11 Conspirator in a debate, you know your theories have a few flaws in it.
 
Gary the ****** and Beetlejuice could own Bill O

Exactly. That's why I am saying that it is very sad that O'Reilly. Freaking O'Reilly. Owned the 9-11 Conspirators. When that happens, there is something obviously wrong with your hypothesis.
 
Alright, I am going to be serious and post on what I think about Bush and 9-11.

1. Bush and his advisors saw the intelligence reports that al-Qaeda was going to use planes in terrorist attacks but ignored the threat as nothing.

2. Because of this criminal negligence, 9-11 happened.

3. The Bush Administration doesn't want this to be known and officially recognized because it will destroy Bush's image for him being "tough" on terrorism when in truth, he is rather weak and his USA PATRIOT Act, War on Terrorism, etc. really does nothing to prevent it.

4. Bush and several aides would probably be brought up on charges of criminal negligence.
 
Alright, I am going to be serious and post on what I think about Bush and 9-11.

1. Bush and his advisors saw the intelligence reports that al-Qaeda was going to use planes in terrorist attacks but ignored the threat as nothing.

2. Because of this criminal negligence, 9-11 happened.

3. The Bush Administration doesn't want this to be known and officially recognized because it will destroy Bush's image for him being "tough" on terrorism when in truth, he is rather weak and his USA PATRIOT Act, War on Terrorism, etc. really does nothing to prevent it.

4. Bush and several aides would probably be brought up on charges of criminal negligence.

This is sorta how I see it too. But it does leave some holes, like the fact that numerous terrorists have taken responsibility for it. Granted, they might have been coerced, paid off or otherwised convinced to lie, but I have a hard time believing that they would willingly cooperate with the very people they are about to attack.

Then there's that whole BBC timestamp thing, the mysterious Pentagon debris and Rumsfeld's (correct me if it wasn't him, I can't remember right now) slip of the tongue about flight 93, all of which are really disconcerting.

Don't get me wrong, I definitely believe that this administration is evil enough to do something like this, but I don't think anyone can say with any degree of certainty that they did.
 
What about the facts that Terrorist claim responsibility for the acts?

i just love how they released that info around the time they also decided to announce they were sending even MORE troops to Iraq.

there will always be some kind of big news that is released at the same time Republicans decide to do something idiotic in order to distract everyone from whatever idiotic thing they are doing at the time.

just because our government says the terrorists claimed responsibility doesn't mean they actually did.
 
Please no one fall for this tactic SB throws out there. Its bait so he can pull out his american government college text book and tell you how wrong you are about the government and how right he, the book and his college professors are.

This road has been traveled many times before. Cant we all just agree to disagree on this subject because everyone who posts has there opinion and are not going to change them anytime soon regardless of what evidence is presented from ANY source.

P.S. It was the governments fault. :up: :)

Thats actually a good point and why I think at this point I will just sit on the sidelines and watch because like he said, nobody is going to change anyones mind on this.By the time someone has made up their mind about this issue and comes on here and posts,no matter what you say to them,your not going to change their mind.
 
But disregard all the scientists, engineers and scholars who believe anything to the contrary, got it.:down

yeah because if they are not government employed,they have been payed off and gotten to like having their familys lives threatened if they dont shut up.
 
Is it the so-called "Scholars for Truth" spouting their conpiracies?

Funny how he forgets to mention that George Bush and the government are spouting off their so called conspiracys that it was Bin Laden and Muslims behind it all.:whatever: THEIR the ones that dont know ****.
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"