Ex Wife awarded 6 figure settlement 25 years after divorce.

Asgard

Kanga Fu
Joined
Sep 10, 2005
Messages
3,669
Reaction score
35
Points
58
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...ex-wife-awarded-six-figure-payout-even-thoug/

The ex-wife of a green energy tycoon has been awarded a "modest" divorce payment of £300,000, despite her former husband starting his business a decade after they split up.


Kathleen Wyatt had earlier demanded a £1.9 million payout from Dale Vince, a former New Age traveller, although she did not lodge a maintenance claim until more than 25 years after they had separated, and nearly 20 years after their divorce. She was awarded the lump sum in final settlement of their divorce cash battle, but how much she will actually receive remains uncertain, because of outstanding legal bills which have yet to be fully quantified.

Judges were told that the couple met as students, married in 1981 when they were in their early 20s, and lived a New Age traveller lifestyle. They separated in the mid-1980s and divorced in 1992.

In the mid-1990s Mr Vince began a business career and went on to become a green energy tycoon after launching a company called Ecotricity - and justices were told that the business group is worth at least £57 million.
Approving the terms of the settlement, High Court family judge Mr Justice Cobb, sitting in London, said: "I am perfectly satisfied that it is reasonable, and that the wife is entitled to receive a modest capital award following the breakdown of this marriage.

"The lump sum payment agreed between the parties fairly represents, in my view, a realistic and balanced appraisal of the unusual circumstances of this case."

Neither Ms Wyatt, 55, of Monmouth, nor Mr Vince, 53, of Stroud, Gloucestershire, were in court for the announcement of the settlement.
Mr Vince is a former New Age traveller who became a millionaire businessman years after the couple parted.
There was a legal battle over whether her late claim against him could proceed, which Ms Wyatt finally won in the Supreme Court. Mr Vince described the decision as "mad".



Mother-of-four Ms Wyatt lodged a claim for "financial remedy" in 2011.
Deputy High Court Judge Nicholas Francis gave her claim the green light in 2012. Three appeal judges blocked the claim in 2013.
But the Supreme Court justices said it should go ahead.
One justice, Lord Wilson, said Ms Wyatt's claim was "legally recognisable" and not an "abuse of process".

He said she had been unwise to pitch her claim at £1.9 million, adding that an award approaching that size was "out of the question".
But he said justices thought that there was a "real prospect" that she would get a "comparatively modest award" - perhaps enough to buy a mortgage-free house.

Lord Wilson said Ms Wyatt was in poor health and lives in a "modest house" in Monmouth.
He said she sometimes has low-paid jobs, and at other times she "gets by" on state benefits.
Lord Wilson said Mr Vince, of Stroud, Gloucestershire, was a "remarkable man".

"In his 20s he was a New Age traveller with no money at all," said Lord Wilson.
"But one year at the Glastonbury festival he rigged up a contraption from which he provided a wind-powered telephone service.
"It was the start of a business which, as a result of his ingenuity and drive, has led to his manufacture and sale of green energy on a massive scale.
"His company, Ecotricity Group Ltd, is now worth at least £57 million."
Lord Wilson said Mr Vince lives, with his second wife, in a Georgian fort.
Mr Vince said of the Supreme Court ruling against him: "I feel that we all have a right to move on and not be looking over our shoulders.
"This could signal open season for people who had brief relationships a quarter of a century ago ... it's mad in my opinion."
How is it reasonable for this guy to have to pay this woman hundreds of thousands of dollars after they divorced years before he made his fortune? She wasnt a part of his life when he made his money so how do the courts justify she's entitled to make a claim for any of it? I mean the guy is even paying her legal fees. Its insane.

There must be more to this story for that kind of a ruling.
 
Well, it does say in the story there are unusual circumstances but it is unclear what they are. Not sure how it works across the pond but usually in a divorce over here alimony is paid and set for x dollars for x amount of time. If there are children involved though that could be what entitled her to this bit of money, I know when I was young my father was ordered to pay child support and once he started making a lot of money as a captain for a major airline my mom took him back to court to get the child support upped which could be a similar thing here.

Personally though, if I became a millionaire and my ex was in poor health and sometimes living off the state I would just be a decent human and help her without being compelled to do so by the court regardless of how things ended. That's just me though.
 
Well, it does say in the story there are unusual circumstances but it is unclear what they are. Not sure how it works across the pond but usually in a divorce over here alimony is paid and set for x dollars for x amount of time. If there are children involved though that could be what entitled her to this bit of money, I know when I was young my father was ordered to pay child support and once he started making a lot of money as a captain for a major airline my mom took him back to court to get the child support upped which could be a similar thing here.

Personally though, if I became a millionaire and my ex was in poor health and sometimes living off the state I would just be a decent human and help her without being compelled to do so by the court regardless of how things ended. That's just me though.
I read that the child they had together is an adult already so I dont think it has anything to do with child support. I wonder how bad her situation is considering she already has a home and is married.
 
Right, the child would be an adult now but would have been a child during the mid-90's as his father was building his empire. Granted, it's hella late in the game to be requesting an upping of the child support for an already adult child so it's really stretching it. Only thing I could really think of though.
 
This story makes no sense. I read it and still can't find the justification for giving the ex-wife money he earned after they were divorced and 25 years after the fact when she demanded "remediation" 20 years after they had been divorced.

I can't see how this is even reasonable.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"