terry78
My name is Stefan, sweet thang
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2004
- Messages
- 88,379
- Reaction score
- 8,391
- Points
- 203
William Ammons and Brian Hooks, both 19, would have been eligible for the ultimate penalty, but the third defendant was only 17 at the time, so prosecutors chose not to seek the death penalty against any of them.
"As a matter of proportion, it would have been improper for the death penalty to be sought," said Brian Cavanagh, the assistant state attorney prosecuting the case.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2005 that people convicted of crimes committed when they were under 18 cannot face execution.
Hooks' and Ammons' lawyers said the prosecutors' decision not to seek the death penalty was proper.
"It takes courage. They didn't just do something that would have been politically expedient," said attorney Sam Halpern, who represents Ammons. "He's been living under the shadow of a possible death sentence for about a year."
wait until they're 18 then kill them.
Because you know, minors have no mind of their own or know exactly what they're doing.I'll tell you what led them into doing it, Bum Fights.![]()
Not by choice.There are teens in Florida?![]()
yeah after a few years in federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison and they'll wish they got the death penalty...fresh meat....i can hear the inmates chanting now"FISH! FISH! FISH! FISH!"
There are teens in Florida?![]()
Not a bad ideatake all their money and through them on iraqi street cornor
seriously!yeah after a few years in federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison and they'll wish they got the death penalty...fresh meat....i can hear the inmates chanting now"FISH! FISH! FISH! FISH!"