Matt
IKYN Guy Groupie
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2000
- Messages
- 80,934
- Reaction score
- 9
- Points
- 31
We need a :STFUMatt: smiley.
jag
Thats it! You can't ride on Air Force Fun!
We need a :STFUMatt: smiley.
jag
Thats it! You can't ride on Air Force Fun!
What about meeeee?
You can ride. Jag can too if he shares and lets me play with his rocket launcher.
so you'd pretty much turn us into the new Soviet Union?
sounds like it. don't know where he gets the idea that the poor pay taxes... unless he's using the new (laughable) poverty figures.
"46 percent of people defined as 'living in poverty' by our government actually own their own homes .. and the average home owned by a person 'living in poverty' is a three-bedroom house with one-and-one-half baths, a garage and a porch or patio. And in that garage you'll find a car; in 31 percent of 'poor' households you'll find two. You tell someone living in South America that this is how we define poverty and they'll laugh you right into next week."
"In the United States you can have $10 million in a checking account, own a $10 million house with a seven-car garage free and clear, have a Rolls Royce for every day of the week, own a $42 million Gulfstream V, have a $15 million penthouse on Park Avenue, and another $5 million walking-around money in your pocket and still be officially designated by the Imperial Federal Government of the United States as 'living in poverty.' Why? Because in determining who is poor and who is not poor in the U.S., our government only counts income, it does not count accumulated wealth. When you quit working you quit having an income (unless you have investment income). When you quit having income, you're poor."
http://boortz.com/nuze/index.html
no, i couldn't tell if you were being serious or not. it certainly looks like you were trying to be funny.
I was being serious. I know it seems a little odd. Some of the stuff didn't come out the way I meant it, but I do feel that we as Americans have to lose a leash. I am not saying we should choke every one, but we do need to tighten it.
i would urge you to study the history of the founding of our government and the principles behind it, and why the founding fathers instituted a republic and not a democracy.I believe in a free country, but at the same time. I believe that at the end of the day it should be the Leader's final choice. I really feel right now the Government is controlled by way to many people. I would also highly consider getting rid of the senate, & house. Once again to many chickens in the hen house.
I am aware that this could pose a horrendous problem if the wrong leader were to be elected, but the people would still vote, so it would be up to them. Which reminds me. I would also get rid of the Electoral college. Let the people truly make there decision.
This wouldn't be a communist state.
it seems more than odd; it's downright contradictory. you are proposing a dictatorship and coming down in opposition to liberty.
i would urge you to study the history of the founding of our government and the principles behind it, and why the founding fathers instituted a republic and not a democracy.
there is. it's called a constitutional republic, which is exactly what the United States is.There needs to be some sort of Balance between Dictatorship, & Democracy.
"When employers hire illegal workers at a cut rate, they pass onto taxpayers the cost of health care and other government services used by workers and their families. I can't help but see the business lobby's support of guest-worker programs as anything but an attempt to get working people to subsidize cheapskate corporations so they can sell their products at bargain prices and make bigger profits."
there is. it's called a constitutional republic, which is exactly what the United States is.
i thought you said you were being serious. clearly, you aren't.
a well reasoned response.that's an idiotic assessment.
sorry but it is.
no kidding. i don't see the word "large" in that passage anywhere, do you? do you wrongly assume that all corporations are large?it's not just large cheapskate corporations that hire illegal immigrants.
really? so no one else is affected by social security/identity fraud, your tax dollars don't support education, health care, etc., for illegals?and off the top of my head I can't produce evidence but recently a study was made that the people affected by Illegal immigration and guest worker programs are the poor.
well that was a lot of talk without saying anything, now wasn't it? you really know how to support your position. really looks like you know what you're talking about.let me however point out that you outstandingly wrong.
outstandingly.
look up what the largest economy in the US is.
then look up some stats related to the underlying topic of illegal immigration.
if you're smart, the pieces will come together quite nicely.
why would I waste effort on explaining the mechanics of it's idiocy, any one even remotely familiar with border economics knows it's flawed.a well reasoned response.
no kidding. i don't see the word "large" in that passage anywhere, do you? do you wrongly assume that all corporations are large?
really? so no one else is affected by social security/identity fraud, your tax dollars don't support education, health care, etc., for illegals?
Illegal immigration has both negative and positive impacts on different parts of the economy. As noted above, wages for low-skilled workers go down. But that means the rest of America benefits by paying lower prices for things like restaurant meals, agricultural produce and construction. Another negative impact is on government expenditures. Since undocumented workers generally don't pay income taxes but do use schools and other government services, they are seen as a drain on government spending.
There are places in the United States where illegal immigration has big effects (both positive and negative). But economists generally believe that when averaged over the whole economy, the effect is a small net positive. Harvard's George Borjas says the average American's wealth is increased by less than 1 percent because of illegal immigration.
The economic impact of illegal immigration is far smaller than other trends in the economy, such as the increasing use of automation in manufacturing or the growth in global trade. Those two factors have a much bigger impact on wages, prices and the health of the U.S. economy.
well that was a lot of talk without saying anything, now wasn't it? you really know how to support your position. really looks like you know what you're talking about.
Here in So. California several hospital emergency rooms have been shut down over the years due to people who cannot pay the bills. Most of these people are illegals. Stories have hit the newspapers as well about Mexican women who are about to give birth running across the border to a U.S. hospital so that they can get free medical care and have the kid born on U.S. soil. As a result of this several emergency rooms have shut down, more than one hospital has closed and there is another right now that may close.