Honestly, what in your opinion should be their first step. They have a hurdle being owned by Time Warner, but what route would you suggest they take, as a fan?
Exactly what they're doing. Finish out the Batman franchise, jumpstart the Superman franchise, and entertain ideas for films involving other superheroes, developing them carefully, as they will likely be HUGE projects. If we haven't seen another hero's movie by 2012, then we can start panicking.
Their entire DC lineup, from the early 20th century until now, could sustain an empire with the amount of merchandising they could do, but they choose to only milk Batman and Superman. The amount of people out there that aren't aware of some of the more marketable characters is staggering, and WB chooses not to put them out there for some inane reason.
$$$ and risk. IRON MAN showed that you can make a decent, relatively faithful superhero movie and clean up at the box office. Don't think they didn't notice. That's probably why SUPERMAX is being talked up.
- If not now than WHEN?? There is no point in dreaming of WW, Flash or GL if we have no idea.
Sure there is. Because it's fun to talk about the concepts. I've been talking about a WATCHMEN movie with WATCHMEN fans for fifteen years. It's never once gotten old, and seeing the movie actually happen is almost a dream come true.
- The reality is that someone named David Dobkin is supposed to be directing the Flash, yet he has said or done NOTHING since being hired SIX MONTHS AGO.
You don't know that he's done nothing. You don't know what his contract involves. He may well have been hired to develop the project, and they may move on to another director at some point. That is the nature of the business.
Someone named Greg Berlanti is directing the Green Lantern, and neither of those films have release dates or casting set.
So? That just means the movie isn't happening RIGHT NOW.
WB is a mega-studio, shouldn't they have those answers?
No. It would be silly to expect them to have those answers. It's like asking Marvel to know exactly what form the AVENGERS movie will take at this point in the game, or asking why Marvel hasn't put SUB MARINER onscreen yet.
They have them for Harry Potter but not for DC, which has been their subsidiary since way before the first HP book was written.
HARRY POTTER was, is, and always will be a far more profitable franchise than any superhero one, simply because of the "kid/family" factor. HARRY POTTER is one of those ideas that comes along only every so often, and when it does, it makes a massive splash. It's POWER RANGERS without an expiration date. Now, projects like THE FLASH have a shot at that market, but will, in all likelihood just never touch HARRY POTTER. That's just the reality of the situation.
It just strikes me as completely illogical for fans to whine because "WB doesn't put out more than two or three massive fantasy/superhero projects a year".