Full House Revival in the Works

http://www.people.com/article/fuller-house-mary-kate-ashley-olsen-missing-john-stamos-dave-coulier

"Ashley said, I have not been in front of a camera since I was 17 and I don't feel comfortable acting," executive producer Bob Boyett tells PEOPLE in this week's cover story. "Mary-Kate said, It would have to be me because Ash doesn't want to do it. But the timing is so bad for us."

if you've been in front of the camera from the time you were 2 until you were near 20, you'd probably not want to deal with it anymore either
 
gallery-1452094406-fuller-house-1024-1-1452088656.jpg

Why does this make me *sad*?

Like... man... everywhere you look, y'know?
 
Everyone looks so old and bad except John Stamos and Lori Loughlin, who have both somehow defied aging.
 
Everyone looks so old and bad except John Stamos and Lori Loughlin, who have both somehow defied aging.

I actually thought the opposite. I thought they all aged pretty well overall.
 
I dunno, maybe it is a bad picture? Looking at the pictures on the previous page, the cast looks a hell of a lot better than they do in their posed group photo.
 
I don't know, I'm talking about the same picture you are. I mean, honestly, they all just look normal for their respective ages to me outside Stamos and Loughlin who look about the same, and Saget, who only looks a little more aged.
 
I don't know, I'm talking about the same picture you are. I mean, honestly, they all just look normal for their respective ages to me outside Stamos and Loughlin who look about the same, and Saget, who only looks a little more aged.

I disagree. I think it is a pretty bad picture. Saget looks aged. Joey looks like a fat, balding, middled aged man, about to hit senior status, who is dressing like a 25 year old hipster in a desperate attempt to stay youthful (come to think of it though...that might be fitting for Joey).

Stephanie and Gibler have weird looks on their faces (both smiles look like someone who is forcing themselves to smile and nod politely while desperately
fighting off the urge to poop). And Candace Cameron has way too much makeup on and is being shot from a horrible angle that makes her look much heavier than she actually is in the other photos (especially in the face). Come to think of it, all of the women, with the exception of Loughlin, have way too much makeup on.
 
It's amusing that the Katsopolises are the ones who appeared to not have aged. Uncle Jesse and Aunt Becky bathe in virgin's blood or something.
 
It's amusing that the Katsopolises are the ones who appeared to not have aged. Uncle Jesse and Aunt Becky bathe in virgin's blood or something.

There is a reason that Nicky and Alex aren't in the picture. Fuller House is gonna be dark.

That said, I am a heterosexual and I have absolutely no problem admitting that John Stamos is the most attractive man to have ever lived.
 
Look at actual pictures of their faces, not glamour shots with great make up, lighting and photoshop They all look their ages, Lori Laughlin and John Stamos are not unaging and they don't look like they did 20 years ago. That doesn't mean they look bad, they look really good but there's no way anyone would mistake them for their younger selfs.



I disagree. I think it is a pretty bad picture. Saget looks aged. Joey looks like a fat, balding, middled aged man, about to hit senior status, who is dressing like a 25 year old hipster in a desperate attempt to stay youthful (come to think of it though...that might be fitting for Joey).

Stephanie and Gibler have weird looks on their faces (both smiles look like someone who is forcing themselves to smile and nod politely while desperately
fighting off the urge to poop). And Candace Cameron has way too much makeup on and is being shot from a horrible angle that makes her look much heavier than she actually is in the other photos (especially in the face). Come to think of it, all of the women, with the exception of Loughlin, have way too much makeup on.



Wow. That's more analysis than I expected



Also the living room has changed. This whole show is a failure now!



Full+House+Living+Room.png


Fuller-House-04.jpg





Looks like in the past 20 years the couch has slide down to Joey's left.

Also the back wall by where Joey is standing in the first pic has changed
 
who is to say that that house did not have any remodeling since 94? When I was a kid we had this house that had doors that had windows in them that slid into the walls expanding the living room, my dad decided to remove the doors and shave down the walls and drywall over them thus making it one room instead of 2 smaller rooms.
 
I may be wrong, but I'm thinking he's making a bit of a joke at Matt's expense by basically saying that everything and everyone doesn't look exactly the same as before maybe?

Look at actual pictures of their faces, not glamour shots with great make up, lighting and photoshop They all look their ages

Yeah, basically. I really don't see how any of them look that bad at all really.
 
Everyone looks so old and bad except John Stamos and Lori Loughlin, who have both somehow defied aging.

Maybe that's part of it. It also seems like some of the smiles are forced which kinda underlines the inkling I have that this whole project is forced. That combined with the sagginess of some of the actors makes it fee like we're reviving something dead. The little girl on the far right somehow reminds me of the girl from the Girl Meets World and it just reminds me how creatively bankrupt our society seems to be.

I think there's a little heart here, something that will surprise me. I think there's a real feeling of family among the cast that I think a lot of other sitcoms may not have 20 years later. There's hope... but the situation that makes hope the best thing going for this show, for me at least, is really just... tragic. And honestly, I can't even say I'm not part of the problem. If this were an unrelated sitcom about a single mother, her sister, best friend, their young kids and old uncles... would I even notice? Probably not. Just... it's tough times out here.
 
Maybe that's part of it. It also seems like some of the smiles are forced which kinda underlines the inkling I have that this whole project is forced. That combined with the sagginess of some of the actors makes it fee like we're reviving something dead. The little girl on the far right somehow reminds me of the girl from the Girl Meets World and it just reminds me how creatively bankrupt our society seems to be.

That's a whole lot to take back from a sequel to Full House...
 
Apparently they hit up Elizabeth Olsen, trying to get her to take over the role of Michelle.
 
Apparently they hit up Elizabeth Olsen, trying to get her to take over the role of Michelle.


http://www.eonline.com/news/727961/...m_medium=rssfeeds&utm_campaign=rss_topstories


We actually went to—I don't think this has been talked about...I didn't do it, I think Jeff Franklin did—I said, 'Call the sister [Elizabeth Olsen]. Ask her'…We talked to her agent and her agent was like, 'Come on she's not going to do that,' but we did call her agent," Stamos told Cohen on his SiriusXM talk show RadioAndy.


"That would've been kind of genius…I mean take kinda out of that sentence," Cohen said.
"Yeah," Stamos replied.
 
They thought Elizabeth Olsen would want to take part in this?! :lmao:
 
... among other things that are no doubt much more rewarding than taking her older sisters' hand-me-down role on a reboot of their s*** 90s sitcom.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"