They are. They hinted that Bullock brought down a lot of corruption, going all the way to Akins, in the Face the Face arc. It will be talked about more about halfway through 52, I think?CConn said:It was never really explained in any great detail. It was just one of those OYL changes. Maybe they're saving the details for 52, I dunno.
droogiedroogie2 said:They are. They hinted that Bullock brought down a lot of corruption, going all the way to Akins, in the Face the Face arc. It will be talked about more about halfway through 52, I think?
I think it was painfully obvious both Gordon and Bullock were little more than returns to the status quo. Still, while it may not progress the character(s) much, it isn't always a bad thing. Not to mention, you pretty much knew Atkins didn't have much of a future after everything he pulled in War Games.The Question said:I'm not too big on Gordon being back. Seems like a step backwards to me.
CConn said:I think it was painfully obvious both Gordon and Bullock were little more than returns to the status quo. Still, while it may not progress the character(s) much, it isn't always a bad thing. Not to mention, you pretty much knew Atkins didn't have much of a future after everything he pulled in War Games.
fifthfiend said:I mean honestly, Jim Gordon's been in comics longer than Batman,
Darthphere said:Maggie Sawyer for Comissioner....