• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

HULK VS WOLVERINE and HULK VS THOR (no joke)

No you don't seem to get it. Superman wouldn't even have to lay a finger on Hulk, therefore, Hulk doesn't get as angry, therefore, Hulk doesn't get as strong. He would just freeze him, fly him into outer space. Game over.
 
^Well, what makes you think the Hulk would just let Supes do that? Why didn't Supes just try that trick on Doomsday?
Whoa good answer.Also Pre-Crsis Superman probably would have been able to but the new Superman can't breath out there.
So the whole space argument not working.
 
Last edited:
Okay allow me to break it down to you kids here.

I know this may sound stupid but lets set a little reality in here(Reality being placed in the comic book realm i know sounds crazy but hear me out)

1.The madder Hulk gets the stronger Hulk gets period
Superman is immensely strong yes we know that but he still has his limits
Hulk(not the professor hulk) but the normal puny Banner Hulk will win and don't even get me started with the Savage Hulk.The Hulk has near limitless strength and stamina and durability.
2.If this fight was in reality Hulk will decimate Superman no contest.No super breath or heat vision will stop him Superman would have to rely completely on brute strength and that will be too bad because the Hulk is the strongest period

Now since this is after all the comic book world there is one golden rule that not too many people know about Superman and that is...

Superman will always win comic battles he will never lose no matter how strong the opponent because he is the granddaddy of superheroes,a legend.He is the first superhero that had his death talked about on the news.So according to this code Superman will always win no question.The only reason why Doomsday won was because DC had to shake things up in the Superman comics.
You don't believe???
Okay then anyone remember JLA/Avengers crossover???
Superman defeated Thor.That may make sense to some people but the last time I checked Thor uses a mystical hammer and one of Superman's weaknesses is mysticism unless they somehow made him stronger so that he longer has this weakness.
Sorry this guys right.
Also Doomsday didn't even win.He did however kill Superman or whatever.
I don't see Doomsday whooping the Hulk never
So that should answer it.
But since like the man said since Superman is Superman he will always win.
 
It's really all about who's popular.
For crying out loud they even have it plausible for Batman to beat up Superman.
That's why I don't buy this whole stupid Wolverine vs.Hulk.
Gimmee a freakin break!!!!
 
i got my copy yesterday i prefer thor vs hulk i call it that because it seemed like a thor pilot episode which in itself isn't too bad an idea
 
Well I saw both and thought it was fun to watch. I did however have a problem with Wolverine being able to dodge the Hulk whereas as far as I know he does not have super speed. Plus that he could survive even one punch without his face caving in on his skull seems abit much for me plus his healing powers were off the charts. He walks through a rain of bullet without slowing down...... I must say Deadpool was very funny though.

Regarding Thor, I guess given they made it a mindless Hulk and Thor as usual wanted to confront him head on, I guess the result is conform to the comics.
 
I just saw it.
Hulk vs Wolverine is outstanding. I loved it. All of the characters, even Sabertooth and Omega-Red, whom I was never fond of, I found bad@ss. If they make a Omega-Red as bad@ss in the second Wolverine movie, I'm sold.
The movie was everything it should be between Hulk and Wolverine. It was brutal, it was bloody, it had a lot of screams, punchs and kicks. It's good to see Hulk smashing to the maximum and Wolverine slicing and dicing without PG limits. The dialogue is great, too. All the voiceovers are great.
And, of course, the thing I was eager to see...Deadpool. Moron, never stops talking and funny. The true Deadpool, also his first time out of the comics and games. Also, there's a little bit more of him after the credits.
10/10

As for Hulk vs Thor, I wasn't expecting much and I can't see how it could be better. It had Thor, it had Loki, it had Asgard and other realms, it had Odin, it had Bruce and Hulk. Probably everything was there, the problem is that Thor isn't a character I'm fond of. I never cared about him, but the fights and the dialogues were all great.
7/10
 
so which character will Lionsgate tackle next?

Really hoping to see Punisher vs Wolverine

Punisher vs Deadpool. :woot:

Anyone want to see pre-Civil War New Avengers?
I want to see Spidey in one of these animated movies.
 
Sorry this guys right.
Also Doomsday didn't even win.He did however kill Superman or whatever.
I don't see Doomsday whooping the Hulk never
So that should answer it.
But since like the man said since Superman is Superman he will always win.
Yep it's true it's been this way for a long time.Superman defeating Thor makes no sense to me.That's why I don't like Superman because writers tend to forget about his weaknesses just so that he can get another win,I mean in their eyes he's all powerful.
The worst part about Superman defeating Thor was that he defeated him using heat vision dammit!!!
LOFL!!!!
 
Just watched hulk vs thor

I thought it was by far a better concept and story, it's very similar to a fanfiction i had about somethign similar happening on earth except for it was the grey hulk rampaging and it was samson fighting him.

it's just a real big shame thor had to take so many licks and didn't hold his own so well.

i'm surprised so many preferred the wolverine one, it was kinda empty plotwise andmany of the villains didn't get much character development

you seemed to get a personality for most of the gods and also banner (which never happened in the wolverine one) in this film.

great concept.

9/10 for film 6/10 for fights
 
I just saw it.
Hulk vs Wolverine is outstanding. I loved it. All of the characters, even Sabertooth and Omega-Red, whom I was never fond of, I found bad@ss. If they make a Omega-Red as bad@ss in the second Wolverine movie, I'm sold.
The movie was everything it should be between Hulk and Wolverine. It was brutal, it was bloody, it had a lot of screams, punchs and kicks. It's good to see Hulk smashing to the maximum and Wolverine slicing and dicing without PG limits. The dialogue is great, too. All the voiceovers are great.
And, of course, the thing I was eager to see...Deadpool. Moron, never stops talking and funny. The true Deadpool, also his first time out of the comics and games. Also, there's a little bit more of him after the credits.
10/10

As for Hulk vs Thor, I wasn't expecting much and I can't see how it could be better. It had Thor, it had Loki, it had Asgard and other realms, it had Odin, it had Bruce and Hulk. Probably everything was there, the problem is that Thor isn't a character I'm fond of. I never cared about him, but the fights and the dialogues were all great.
7/10

I must admit Hulk vs Wolverine was the best by far.Great moments and the animated short very much reminded me of the Wolverine from his own comic series.It pretty much had it all.Great action some comedy and Sabretooth's blood lust was intact.He wanted to drop the the Hulk off in an orphanage???
Now that's pure evil.The best part was when Lady D got a healthy dose of the thunderclap to the face,it was arguably the best part in the animated short.:woot:
 
Despite actually managing to nab the 6th Marvel & Lion's Gate DTV in the latest series, HULK VS. about a week or so before the street release date from a local CD/DVD shop in my neighborhood, I have put off typing my usual long reviews. The first was because I know some people specifically hunt for them and I wanted to give them a chance to be as surprised as I was with HULK VS., especially since I avoided a lot of the sneak peak videos that were all over the place the last 2-3 months. The other reason was because I will probably go on for a bit and I have a work schedule.

The disc contains two short films, the 37 minute HULK VS. WOLVERINE that was shown at the SDCC last year, and the 45 minute HULK VS. THOR feature. I opted for the two disc special edition, which has two commentaries for each feature as well as the Making Of feature, and a preview of WOLVERINE AND THE X-MEN and the next DTV, "THOR: TALES OF ASGARD" (which is basically "Teen Thor" and a possible riff on the THOR: SON OF ASGARD mini). Reponsible for both features are the writing duo of Craig Kyle and Chris Yost, who have collaborated on most of these DTV's, as well as for some Marvel comics, X-MEN EVOLUTION's last three seasons, and the canceled FANTASTIC FOUR: WORLD'S GREATEST HEROES TV series (which, as a plug, if you accept more as a sitcom than a sheer action show, is a good watch overall). Aboard for the principle direction is Frank Paur, who came into the mix for the disappointing INVINCIBLE IRON MAN feature and has remained involved in the last several since then. Jeff Matsuda, who left THE BATMAN around Season 3 or so to work on HULK VS. WOLVERINE, also worked on the character designs for that.

As Kyle and Yost, both in recent history and in upcoming or ongoing shows (such as the continuing WOLVERINE AND THE X-MEN and the upcoming Avengers and Thor cartoons) are pretty much going to be the writers responsible for the bulk of Marvel's animation from here onward, I have been interested in seeing them develop. For some time on their past DTV's, especially their last effort, NEXT AVENGERS, I wondered if they ever would be ready for prime time. If they could ever produce a work that went for the gusto and was willing to at least challenge TV network borders, even on projects where there were none and they STILL played it disgustingly safe. I also was originally not impressed with the initial preview statements about the HULK VS. films in general; an entire DVD based around two fights with the Hulk? I probably compared it to pro wrestling at least once. Could there be plot and wit behind a disc that was almost proud of screaming about it focusing on two grunge matches against Marvel's most overpowered superhero (seriously, not even Goku would beat the Hulk).

This is one occasion where I don't mind being so entirely
wrong, because the product we got was in some ways a blueprint on how to do some Marvel cartoons right. No Ultimitizing crap, no pretending censorships on violence exist just because Cartoon Network likely will air it at some point. And especially, no crapping out on delivering actual Marvel Universe supervillains, an area where all of the DTV's up to this point seriously suffered from. Well, except for NEXT AVENGERS; Ultron was among the highlights there, albeit with a stupid origin tweak.

From here on in, it will be very long and fill of spoilers.

HULK VS. as a whole:

Both movies, as a whole, benefit from the short run time. While both being about half of a typical feature's length, both are about as long as two TV episodes of a show would be without commercials or intro animation. The short run time also means there is no dilly-dallying with the plot; each feature hits the ground running after about five minutes and doesn't stop until the end. There is no drag time; even in DOCTOR STRANGE, which was a great character piece, there was a bit of drag, spots of 5-10 minutes where my eyes glaze and I want to get to the good stuff.

Both movies also are created almost entirely for the hardcore fan; there are homages to past comics, plenty of cameo's (especially in HULK VS. THOR), and even recreations of some famous poses and comic book covers. The films aren't so heavy laden, though, that a casual fan won't get them. That might be because the starring characters (Hulk, Wolverine, and Thor) are so iconic as is. They don't NEED to be jazzed up with leather Ultimate suits or given a 95 minute origin sequence every time. When written properly, who they are shines through. Plus, in a way, each feature gives you enough data about the characters and stories that even if one isn't a total Marvel Zombie, you have more than enough to enjoy it.

The other plus to both films are the villains. In all of the Marvel/LG DTV's so far, the villains have usually been a sore spot. They were virtually non-existent in ULTIMATE AVENGERS. The Kleiser from ULTIMATE AVENGERS 2 was a poor man's Red Skull and wasn't terribly deep. INVINCIBLE IRON MAN's version of Manadarin was pure LOTR rip-off garbage and the rest of the minions had less life than a TEKKEN final boss. DOCTOR STRANGE had simplified, WORLD OF WARCRAFT-esque versions of Baron Mordo and Dormammu who were beaten with ease within about 10 minutes by the end. NEXT AVENGERS actually did a solid job with Ultron, it was just the heroes who were lacking. HULK VS., however, gets the villains 100% right. They're not "modernized" stabs at classics; they ARE the classics. Hell, HULK VS. WOLVERINE throws two extra villains into the mix who NEVER were part of Weapon X/Team X, and it is so awesome that no one will care. HULK VS. THOR delivers in spades with Loki and Enchantress, and even manages more cameos.

There also is more going on to the stories than the simple fight against the Hulk, or even the Hulk himself. Within a short run time and expert pacing, a lot happens even with the movies seeming to fly by, never seeming too long or too short. The voice acting is also top notch all around, especially, of course, Fred Tatasciore as the Hulk and Bryce Johnson (last cast as Stephan Strange in DOCTOR STRANGE) as the gentle Dr. Banner. Fred has voiced the Hulk in at least three DTV's, one video game and one WOLVERINE AND THE X-MEN appearance, and is about as good a voice as the Green Goliath as we've gotten in a good long while. Yost and Kyle cast actors they were familiar with via past TV and DTV experiences, and it pays off in spades in the performances. There isn't a bad role in the mix.

The extras, at least on the 2-disc, are pretty good beyond one exception; the commentaries with Frank Paur are kind of boring. They have some interesting tidbits, but they usually aren't very fun to listen to and there were times I almost wanted them to be quiet so I could watch the movie, which is not the best reaction to a commentary. Yost & Kyle's commentaries, on the other hand, are both interesting and hilarious to listen to. The two have a clear rapport as friends and professional collaborators, and it comes through. I must note that even the general single disc edition has more extras than ANY of the last Marvel/LG's discs had. This is a step in the right direction, especially as the incredible number of extras on the HELLBOY ANIMATED films almost set the bar.

The animation quality, by anime vets MADHOUSE, is what you would expect; excellent. Honestly, anyone who doesn't expect brilliance from Madhouse hasn't paid attention to animation lately.

HULK VS. WOLVERINE:

Honestly, this was and still is my favorite of the two, but it is also an entirely different story than HULK VS. THOR. One could argue it is barely a story; it is more like about three extended fight sequences with enough of a story written around it. In the commentary, Kyle & Yost admitted that out of all their features, this one was written almost on the fly, and it shows. Not in a bad way; the story feels very kinetic and moves at a super fast pace.

Jeff Matsuda does the character design work for this one, and was thrilled to work on Wolverine & Hulk, at least from the feature. His designs for the flick are very distinct and capture the essence of the characters; Hulk is uber-huge, Logan is short but burly, and so forth.

Steven Jay Blum, who plays Wolverine in video games and WOLVERINE AND THE X-MEN, and who has had a 25 year long voice acting career, naturally reprises his reoccurring role as Wolverine and does a great job. I always thought Scott McNeil from EVOLUTION was a bit underrated, but Blum's probably the best Logan we have gotten since Cal Dodd in the 90's. Fred Tatasciore's Hulk, as mentioned above, is great; unlike in HULK VS. THOR, Fred actually has lines to say as the Hulk. He delivers them with the right mix of rage and frustration at times, and is a natural at this point. He has some incredible lines that, even after the 5th or 6th listen, still grab me or make me laugh. X-MEN EVOLUTION's Wolverine, Scott McNeil, also has an "Additional Voices" credit; a team-up of Logan's!

Speaking of laughter, hogging the entire film is Deadpool, who could teach Jim Carrey lessons on mugging for the camera, only in a good way. Beyond a minor blink-and-miss cameo in the 90's X-MEN series, this is Deadpool's first full animated role. He is voiced by Nolan North, another pro voice actor who Kyle & Yost often cast; he was Giant-Man in ULTIMATE AVENGERS 1 & 2 as well as plays Cyclops in WOLVERINE AND THE X-MEN. The role where he really impressed me, besides as Deadpool here, was playing Raph in the 2007 TMNT motion picture. Kyle & Yost, in the commentary and the feature, claim they cast North as Deadpool because IRL he is often cracking "dirty jokes" and that Wade's lines here were mostly ad libbed. That sort of energy plays through with the lines. Nearly every line from Deadpool got either a smirk or a full on laugh from me, and I can be a very hard audience for comedy. His delivery was great, and he steals every scene he is in. His lines were genuinely funny, almost every time, even in tone.

The story itself was a loose adaptation of Wolverine's first appearance in INCREDIBLE HULK #181, where he is ordered by Dept. H to take the Hulk down. Only instead of both of them being involved with the Wendigo, which W&TXM did in their episode, they get involved with Weapon X, Logan's enemies. Logan here is, of course, Pre-X-Men. But it is more than this; this isn't a namby pamby Saturday Morning TV Logan. He says his infamous line at the start, and it proves true. He can STAB and CUT people. He doesn't think twice about killing enemy soldiers. He threatens to kill nasty villains in nasty ways. Despite being a critic of Wolverine later in my life, this movie was the one my inner 13 year old wanted to see Logan in for ages. This was the same Wolverine who was in a lot of those 80's-90's comics. Without the censorship blinders on, Wolverine got to be in some well paced, animated brawls.

The film also got to do his origin, now the 4th time it has been animated. Only this time, they could translate the WEAPON X story from Barry Windsor-Smith's MARVEL COMICS PRESENTS almost panel for panel, with the horrific bonding process and all the bear-killin' action you want. And when Wolverine escapes the tank and turns on his tormentors in flashback, oh, it gave my inner fanboy great joy to see that he wasn't hacking at robots this time, that Professor Thorton wouldn't escape behind a steel wall. No, his men get slaughtered, and his hand is F'ing lopped off. Professor Thorton is voiced by Tom Kane, another Marvel animation voice vet, who does a brilliant, and chilling, job with the role.

Weapon X was causing Hulk's rampages by trying to capture him for study and manipulation. They capture both him and Logan after they ware themselves out fighting each other, and thus force Hulk and Wolverine to unite against the Weapon X cronies. Sort of.

Rounding out the villains are Sabretooth (Mark Acheson) ,Lady Deathstrike (Jayse Jaud), and Omega Red (Colin Murdock). Now, of course, Yuriko and Omega Red were not involved in Weapon X in the comics (Yuriko's father created the adamantium bonding process that Weapon X used, but that was it). But honestly this didn't matter because it provided faithful, and more violent versions of the characters than Saturday Morning would allow. It also makes up for the lackluster version of Red in X-MEN EVOLUTION, who was felled by a foot sweep. Mark Acheson was a unique choice for Sabretooth, his voice wasn't as raspy but was deeper than some other actors who have played Creed, gave him almost more maturity than pure rage. Sabretooth here also reminded me of the early 70's version; vicious (always eager for combat, or sadism, like "dropping Hulk on an orphanage") but hardly invincible. Back in the 70's and early 80's, he got schooled by Iron Fist and Black Cat, after all. Murdock sounds find as the deadly Russian, who often was playing straight-man to Deadpool, while Jaud puts in the right performance as the vicious Deathstrike.

The fights are well storyboarded and brutal. Yet, it doesn't feel too dark because of amusing lines from Deadpool and Hulk. It is the type of flick where you root for your heroes to pummel the bad guys and it doesn't need to be over thought. My favorite line was easily, "Hulk smash claw people!"

The only caveat was the obligatory ending, where the writers can't allow the audience a definitive winner between Hulk and Wolverine, so they go with the ol' ROCKY III freeze frame at the first bell. And yes, the bit at the end of the credits was the cherry atop the sundae.

Hulk here had more to do than Johnson's Banner, who just got some exposition, and it helped make it different than the other feature, besides in animation design. It was a story about one monster fighting another, and both having to shake off being controlled by an organization of even worse monsters, all man made. It was easy to root for the Hulk as he was being perennially chased, although Wolverine naturally came off as very cool and brutal, which was what drew me to his comics as a kid. Plus, unlike WOLVERINE AND THE X-MEN sometimes, when Logan was a jerk, it actually backfired on him; all of his attempts to get Hulk to work with him backfired because he usually executed them in his usual manner. "I'm on yer side, ya flamin' idiot!" and all. That doesn't make Logan bad; I thought it was great. He isn't usually friendly.

Some criticized the obligatory PG-13 language; ass, hell, damn, and the lord's name in vain. I for one actually liked Marvel having their characters talk like they should for a film above PG, rather than just talking like they would on Kid's WB aside for some gore, like in ULTIMATE AVENGERS.
 
Review so long, I needed a Part II!

HULK VS. THOR:

The second film is a different story, and more of one. It is similar in ways beyond some voice actors.
The first tale was about mankind trying to turn Hulk into a weapon. This tale was of an immortal Norse god, Loki, trying to turn Hulk into a weapon of his own means. There is more character pathos, the tone isn't as dark, the scale is grander with the realm of Asgard, and Banner as a character gets more focus; all Hulk does is fight, growl, and scream.

Matt Wolf plays the titular Thor, and he sounds typical of a lot of Thor voice actors; he has the right accent, and carries enough power to the role, without making Thor sound "too old" or wise or whatever. I would have been curious to hear David Boat, who voiced Thor in the UA films, take a stab at some meatier material, but I had no complaints with Wolf's performance. But easily stealing the show was Graham McTavish's Loki. He put so much vile energy into the role that every line seemed to drip with that God of Mischief charm. When Loki was controlling Hulk and pummeling Thor into the ground, and relishing every moment of it in dialogue, one could tell Graham owned the role. Loki's partner in crime here, as happened sometimes in the comics, is Amora the Enchantress, played by Kari Wahlgren (who also plays Emma Frost in WOLVERINE AND THE X-MEN). Her character design is very attractive; Craig Kyle in the commentary bragged that she was "the hottest woman Frank Paur ever designed for them" and I could hardly argue. She brings a right level of malice, but not quite pure maliciousness as McTavish's Loki, as Enchantress is a scorned lover, not an enternal enemy, of Thor. In the end, she wants Thor's love, not his death, and that dynamic shines through in this story. Thor's heart, however, belongs to Sif, played by Grey DeLisle (who has played Wasp in ULTIMATE AVENGERS 1 & 2 as well as a few cameo roles in WOLVERINE AND THE X-MEN, such as Psylocke, and she currently plays Sally Avril on SPECTACULAR SPIDER-MAN too), who puts in a proper performance as well.

The plot is simple, but is far more complex than HULK VS. WOLVERINE. Loki and Enchantress kidnape Bruce Banner from "Midguard" (the mortal Earth) and bring him to Asgard to, basically, pummel Thor for them. Banner goes through his usual routine of resisting, but after a slap by Loki that hurls him about 50 feet, the beast emerges. Enchantress adds the key twist by magically SEPERATING Banner from the Hulk, and then creating a spell in which Loki is able to control the Banner-Less, "Savage Hulk". The idea of Loki using the Hulk against Thor isn't a new one; it was how the Avengers got started, after all. This time, however, Loki uses the Hulk to basically tear into Asgard, and one can feel generations of repressed rage from McTavish here. Loki-Hulk crashes the celebration party being held by the Warriors Three (and Balder). At first jovial, when the Warriors Three go down swiftly, Balder realizes the threat and summons Thor. Besides the Warriors Three, eagle eyed viewers could catch cameo glimpses of Ulik the Rock Troll and Skurge the Executioner (in the comics, a frequent ally/pawn of Enchantress).

The Warriors Three (the ever reliable Paul Dobson as Hogun, Jay Brazeau as Volstagg and Johnathon Holmas as Fandral) get a cute little cameo although it may be a teaser to their expanded role in the upcoming THOR: TALES OF ASGARD DTV. I thought the flick managed to do with them what it did with other extended cameos; capture the essence of the characters even with only a few minutes and lines among them. Valstagg's arrogance and girth, Hogan's stoicness and Fandral's dashing swashbuckler charm. The only cameo I thought was thankless was Balder, played by Michael Adamthwaite (who was Colossus in X-MEN EVOLUTION, Namor in FANTASTIC FOUR: WGH, and even played Thor himself, briefly, in NEXT AVENGERS). Paul Dobson is naturally a longtime voice actor with many roles, including among them Juggernaut in X-MEN EVOLUTION and Dr. Doom in FANTASTIC FOUR: WGH.

Now, of course, comes the controversy; the ease with which Hulk trashes Asgard, and pretty much everyone. For the first portion of the battle, Loki is controlling Hulk, and as Enchantress notes, "his rage is fueling Hulk", who is basically without Banner, who limited Hulk. While the typical Asgardian soldier is felled by one attack by Hulk, Balder at the very least manages to get up, barely, after about three. Naturally, I imagine the scene where Loki, who is more of a mage than a fighter, is able to knock an "average" mortal man like Banner across a room by BARELY tapping his cheek was to showcase now powerful typical Asgardians are to humans. And, of course, to showcase how strong Hulk is by scattering these Asgardians left and right. Each of the Warrior's Three seem to take about two attacks by Hulk to stay down, and Thor of course takes the mother of all beatings.

At the start of the fight, Thor actually is well aware of who the Hulk is, and tries to reason with the Banner side of him. Once it becomes clear that Loki is possessing the Hulk, Thor rallies with a thunderstrike that actually manages to zap Loki's essence from the Hulk. In a way that makes Hulk more dangerous, for now he is "Savage Hulk" who is without mercy or any remorse. The defense that Yost offered in the commentary is "this is Hulk at his strongest". While I understand all of that, I felt this fight, in terms of storyboards and general ideas for it, showcases that Yost & Kyle are FAR more experienced with Wolverine than Thor. In that I mean that they wrote him as most Avengers writers have; Thor is merely a very strong tanker with a hammer that shoots electric attacks of various degrees. Fancy stuff like teleportation, absorbing energy, or a "God Blast" that can even make Galactus pause, that stuff is lost to the shades of Wikipedia. For a contrast, look at the fight between Doomsday and Superman in SUPERMAN: DOOMSDAY. The plot calls for Doomsday to lose, but to have delivered enough punishment to Superman that we can buy that Kal essentially dies from the brawl. The blows both combatants deliver to each other are brutal. Neither side seems to have a continued advantage for long. The force of the blows shows better. In contrast, in HULK VS. THOR, Thor's entire offense amounts to delivering maybe one good combination, being stunned that Hulk withstood it, and then being pummeled for about 10 straight minutes. It also seems like a shortened version of Rocky Vs. Drago from ROCKY IV, where Rocky maybe lands one punch compared to the, like, 15 that Drago will land. It's the worst beating ever. While I can understand that Yost & Kyle's crew isn't as used to JLU style combat than Timm's, this fight clearly showed that they're still novices with Thor. That said, Thor clearly puts up more fight against Hulk than ANYONE within Asgard. He took about ten times the beating that anyone else took. The only bit that really bothered me was Thor smashing through that statue being thrown at him, so Hulk can grab his head, instead of simply dodging it. That was very glaring to me. I could have bought that Thor was inexperienced against Hulk if he didn't clearly know Hulk from past meetings, and by now was aware of his might.

The positive thing, though, is that unlike HULK VS. WOLVERINE, there is more of a story here besides sheer combat. Thor's defeat isn't just to showcase him being weaker than Hulk (and probably less popular, least in the eyes of the writers), it plays a vital role to the plot. Realizing that Loki won't stop until Thor is dead, Enchantress turns against him and literally saves Thor from death's door (or rather, Hela's embrace) with one of those Disney style magic kisses. Thor sends Enchantress to back up Sif, which causes some friction between the ladies that is very entertaining, while he and Loki venture into the Underworld for Banner's soul.

That of course leads to the chapter that focuses on Banner. Having been killed by Loki, Hela took his soul, and sent him to her idea of a worthy afterlife. That actually leads to something Banner never had; peace and happiness. No Hulk, no fights, just Betty and a son. The Norse Underworld is deliberately different than Hell, which is good to showcase. The course of the plot has Hela (Janyse Jaud again) being manipulated by Loki into combining the "whole" soul of Banner, which includes the Hulk part. This forces Banner to make the pivotal choice to abandon the luxuries of eternal peace to save Asgard from Hulk's wrath. At first Banner refuses, but once it become clear that Hulk cannot be stopped, sacrifices his desire to remerge with Hulk, proving his true heroism. If the story was about anything, it was about that Banner is a good person despite the entirely terrible circumstances in his life and in the end will sacrifice his own happiness for a greater good. Often dismissed as the "feeble" shell that houses the Hulk, as Loki often said, Banner is in fact the only bit of soul the monster has. Some of my friends thought it was out of character for Thor to allow Hela to claim Loki's soul, but I thought it was sufficient. Thor is not above allowing Loki to get some comuppance, especially as Hela admitted that she could not keep his soul indefinately. It was mentioned that she was Loki's daughter and being 10' tall, that the Frost Giant blood ran stronger in her than Loki.

Unlike VS. WOLVERINE, the second feature showcases many areas of Asgard, from the outskirts to the city itself to the Underworld with Hela, with a trule magificent opening sequence across the rainbow bridge. It was a primer for Thor lore. Even Brunnhilde the Valkyrie gets a cameo.

While Thor's poor showing against the Hulk may disappoint some fans (and it may be about time Marvel realizes how popular and well known he is, especially if his movie turns out to gross more than either of Hulk's), it doesn't distract from what is a stronger story that features more character. Loki is a truly excellent villain, Banner proves himself a hero, and even Enchantress goes through a bit of a change by the end, or at least her pathos is clear. The only caveat is that hearing someone yell, "For Odin! For Asgard!" is cool once or twice, by the 10th time it gets old. Even Thor has to embrace some of his enemies to save the day.

Overall, though, HULK VS. is easily the best Marvel animated DTV to date. It only took 6 tries for a good one, huh? Anyway, one can only hope that the next DTV's are even half as good as this one. This is a worthy disc for a collector and a fan in general.
 
Wow. I just finished watching Hulk vs. Wolverine.

Fantastic.

It's a simple little tale but it's so cool. Finally Marvel gets one of these animated features right. Ultimate Avengers was enjoyable, but it's sequel and the other's released thus far range from below average to terrible, often within the same film.

I'll watch the Thor one when I get off later today, but I give the Wolverine piece an 8/10 overall. 10/10 if we're just judging the fun factor. A lot of fun to be had watching this. All the character's were spot-on. Deadpool was a standout. Best part of the whole story. I laughed out loud at most of his lines. Never lol'd during a comic book film, before. I can't wait to see Ryan Reynolds do this guy in the live-action movie. :D Hope he's as funny in that as he is here.
 
I would question that:
Did Superman really beat the Hulk in the Marvel versus DC crossover?

I ask this because technically I don't think this question has really been answered.
In the 1970's or 80's Superman/Spiderman crossover Superman and the brute Hulk fought to a stand still.

earthcrossoverall13.jpg



In the Marvelversus DC crossover Superman beat the Hulk but it was the professor Hulk not the brute Hulk not the "Hulk Smash!!!"Who in my opinion is the real Hulk.
It is the strongest version of the Hulk.
The professor Hulk is substantually weaker since Banner has is in total control.
In my opinion I think Marvel did this as a loop hole.Especially since the outcome was decided by the fans.So this fight is invalid.


Dc-vs-marvel.jpg


In a later version somewhere 2005 or 06.Superman once again fought the brute Hulk and again it was a draw each one winning a victory over the other.

Hulk_Superman.jpg


So Superman VS.Hulk The real Hulk anyway.The answer has to be a stand still.If not then:

Superman Vs.Hulk

The reality is this question has never really been answered.


Agreed. However, in the first meeting, the Hulk was growing stronger by the second, and Superman himself doubted the outcome.
 
Yea but he can't fly or anything, he would just be aimlessly floating.
 
i just hate thinking how much more satisfying thor vs hulk woudl have been if they had a real proper toe to toe through down


in defence of the scene, it woudl appear that hulk broke one of thor's arms fairly quickly after loki lost control of him and caused it to be one sided.

still though...

a slow wearing down of thor woudl have been a far more acceptable demise than that ownage
 
This Hulk vs Superman argument is silly Hulk has limitless strength due to the fact that he gets stronger as he becomes more angry, so think how mad he will be when Superman throws him into the sun and there is nothing he can do about it.:woot:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,565
Messages
21,991,398
Members
45,788
Latest member
drperret
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"