If Keaton never made it in 1989......

Discussion in 'Batman World' started by EagleVision, Dec 12, 2007.

  1. EagleVision Man - Myth - Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Messages:
    654
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just curious: (And by the way, Keaton is the man!)

    If our boy Keaton never made the final casting choice for Batman 1989 who would you have chose?

    For me, it would have to be Alec Baldwin. To me, back in that time, Baldwin was the perfect look for the Alex Ross style of Batman in comics. Especially after seeing Baldwin's movie, The Shadow, back in the 90's, I knew then I could really see him pulling it off real well.

    Some other thoughts on choices for Batman 1989??
     
  2. ab38416 Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    441
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think it was going to be Baldwin, but I read that he and Burton didn't get along during Beetlejuice so he fell out of the running.
     
  3. EagleVision Man - Myth - Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Messages:
    654
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hmm interesting, don't think I've ever heard that before.
     
  4. Catman Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    29,046
    Likes Received:
    1
    Exactly. The original studio choice was Mel Gibson but he did Lethal Weapon 2 instead. Someone wanted Alec Baldwin, but Burton and him didn't get along during Beetlejuice.

    Aside from those two (and Keaton) I don't think anyone was a serious contender. So I'm not sure of who would have gotten the role had Keaton not be chosen or had he turned it down.

    But...you asked who WE think would have been great. Well...Alec Baldwin would have been awesome!
     
  5. El Payaso Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2005
    Messages:
    15,262
    Likes Received:
    1
    Baldwin looked exactly like Bruce Wayne. After seeing The Shadow I doubt he would have been better than Keaton. I don't say he'd have been bad but not extraordinary.
     
  6. Punk&ComicBooks Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2007
    Messages:
    671
    Likes Received:
    0
    Back in the day how like when Baldwin looked in The Shadow I thought he could pull off a James Bond...I guess he could have pulled off the batman role but man did he let himself go! Baldwin is very out of shape today!
     
  7. elgaz Registered

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    Messages:
    4,211
    Likes Received:
    538
    Always thought Baldwin would have been the perfect Bruce Wayne back in the day .... he had the right look and could be jovial, but could also do the quiet brooding Batman thing very well. He's 50 now I think and a bit out of shape but he seems to be more into politics than acting these days so probably doesn't have the same motivation to get in shape for any particular film.

    [​IMG]
     
  8. ALP In The Mountains

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2007
    Messages:
    5,011
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree Baldwin would have been a cool choice, and he previously worked with Tim Burton too.
     
  9. bethehero7404 Prove Them Wrong

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2007
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    0
    Do I have to go here?

    Johnny Depp would have worked. Young, upcoming, Burton was in talks with him for Edward Scissorhands anyway. Maybe if he would have asked him to do it originally, he would still be making Batman films today like James Bond.

    Who knows...THIS is a great thread.
     
  10. Spider-Fan83 with great power...

    Joined:
    May 5, 2006
    Messages:
    7,544
    Likes Received:
    349
    i know he was like really young at the time (and this might sound alil out there)

    but, i kinda think, Charlie Sheen, could of been decent back then
    (this was before he got more into comedy roles, back in this "Young Guns" or "Wall Street" days)
    he was young, but, had a mature look for his age (he could of pull off the look)
    [​IMG] [​IMG]
    (though, he never worked with Burton, before)
     
  11. Banshee Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2002
    Messages:
    1,166
    Likes Received:
    0

    Why does everyone think Depp is perfect for every role? He's good, but he doesn't have the look for every character/ person under the sun.
     
  12. FlawlessVictory Registered

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    8,619
    Likes Received:
    0
    A bit off topic, but I thought Michael Douglas would have made one hell of a Harvey Dent/Two-Face back in the day.

    Btw, does everyone know that Michael Keaton's real name is Michael Douglas? :)
     
  13. Spider-Fan83 with great power...

    Joined:
    May 5, 2006
    Messages:
    7,544
    Likes Received:
    349
    ^ya, Douglas could of been good

    actually looking at the "wall street" poster, that whole cast could of been, batman III, Sheen as Bats, Douglas as Two-Face, Hannah as Dr. Chase
    (he's not in the poster, but, was in that movie, too) John C. McGinley as Riddler lol

    agreed,
    if anything, he could of been, the Riddler, or Mad Hatter, in a future sequel (under Burton's direction), though
     
  14. Catman Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    29,046
    Likes Received:
    1
    Agreed. However, he was still AWESOME in The Shadow.


    :whatever: :whatever: :whatever:

    I love Johnny Depp. I think he's the best actor of his generation BUT IN 1988 HE WAS A JOKE!

    This was Johnny around the time Batman went into production:

    [YT]olqCUeZMJy4[/YT]

    um...no.
     
  15. bethehero7404 Prove Them Wrong

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2007
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    0
    But for the sake of arguement Burton went with Depp. Maybe instead of CryBaby being a breakout role. Batman could have been and his relationship with Burton could have been even stronger.

    When Keaton was chosen, people skoffed...when Ledger was cast, people skoffed, who knows, they would have skoffed at Depp too.

    that is what is so fun with this thread. It opens up a ton of possiblities and opens a chance to go back into the past to see who would have worked in 1989. I love it.
     
  16. Catman Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    29,046
    Likes Received:
    1
    I get what you're saying but aside from Platoon, Depp hadn't done any serious work. All he had done was Nightmare On Elm Street, Private Resort, and 21 Jump Street. There's no way WB would have allowed him to be cast in a huge summer blockbuster. Cry Baby, a silly John Waters movie, was the perfect vehicle for him to break out as a serious actor.

    As for Keaton...he had already proven himself the year before with Clean and Sober. Not to mention that he was a big star at the time.
     
  17. Bruce_Wayne29 Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    3,111
    Likes Received:
    0
    Probably Baldwin.
     
  18. bethehero7404 Prove Them Wrong

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2007
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    0
    Touche...agreed.
     
  19. fabman Registered

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2006
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    0
    - Mel Gibson
    - Alec Baldwin
     
  20. Mr. Socko Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    23,325
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG]

    Ford...Harrison Ford.
     
  21. DocLathropBrown If adventure has a name...

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Messages:
    2,755
    Likes Received:
    177
    Gibson, no contest.

    Aside from Keaton, I think he's the only actor of the time that could believeably portray the obsession and the sadness the way that Keaton did. I don't think that Gibson gets enough recognition for his performance in the first Lethal Weapon. It was really, really powerful stuff.
     
  22. BatMatt Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    9,633
    Likes Received:
    0
    well Peters wanted Bill Murray, I need to rewatch the documentary on the SE DVDs of that movie because I remember he had a lot of terrible ideas that fortunately didn't make it
     
  23. Thot Registered

    Joined:
    May 23, 2005
    Messages:
    812
    Likes Received:
    0
    Baldwin would have been, IMO, an even better choice for Batman '89. Keaton was good, but dang was he too short for the role! Burton did a pretty good job of hiding it, but in certain scenes poor Mike looks like a kid in the outfit! Especially after viewing The Shadow, I was convinced Alec was the better choice. Too bad he's too old to ever don the cowl!
     
  24. Catman Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    29,046
    Likes Received:
    1
    Jon Peters was barely mentioned on the DVD. But the decision to cast Bill Murray was made by Ivan Reitman who was briefly involved during the early `80s. Sadly most "haters" associate the Murray casting with Tim Burton.
     
  25. Thespiralgoeson Cryptorchid

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Messages:
    649
    Likes Received:
    0
    Most people would probably scoff at this but I think a young Timothy Dalton would've made an interesting Batman (although I've never heard him attempt an American accent.) He was definitely the most serious, and IMO most compelling and interesting Bond, at least until Craig. If you watch either of the 007 movies he was in, especially License to Kill, he definitely had some Batman-esque qualities, very reminiscent of a young Gregory Peck.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"