JackBauer
Superhero
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2004
- Messages
- 8,890
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Duuuuuuuude......![]()
I'm just really hoping that this is one of those misleading covers, but frankly, I wouldn't put it past him. After watching everyone even remotely likeable in Walking Dead die horrifically, I would not be surprised to see Eve go too.
....aaaaaand I'm done. If he can't figure out how to advance character development without [blackout]pointlessly stuffing the main character's love interest in the refrigerator, EXACTLY LIKE HE ALREADY DID IN WALKING DEAD[/blackout], then I've really lost interest. Especially since the whole reason I loved the comic was its more energetic and fun tone, and now the comic is going off the deep end into gritty angsty 90s-anti-hero bull****.
And to be frank, I really don't care about Conquest. Sure, Angstrom Levy won't exactly go down as comicdom's most memorable villain, but he at least had some character. Same with the Mauler Twins, and Powerplex, and most of the other villains that have shown up. But another big bad Viltrumite? How many of these guys are we going to go through?
Dread said:INVINCIBLE #63: Oh, that Robert Kirkman's a card. Mocking the hype about a certain star spangled Marvel character, he made a special "announcement" at Newsarama that "extra copies" of this issue would ship on this Wednesday, and about how epic it was. In some ways INVINCIBLE WAR in issue sixty was a send-up of overblown events, getting to the meat of a 6-8 issue mini in one oversized one. It even has an "event" style tagger on the cover, noting the aftermath saga, "CONQUEST", which seems poised for four parts.
To be fair, Kirkman was right about this being a big issue. Invincible is still fighting Conquest, the monster of a Viltrumite soldier sent by the empire to take over the planet by any means required. Last issue was pure combat and while a lot of it continues, there is definitely a bit more dialogue here.
Getting the spoiler off the chest quickly, this is the issue in which Atom Eve seemingly and brutally is murdered. The fans were smelling it coming for quite some time, as nearly every month Kirkman got a "don't kill Eve" letter even since before issue 60. Apparently in WALKING DEAD he kills noble, fan-fave characters often. Of course they are all his babies and he is creatively free to kill them off when he wants. But, some solicits implied a funeral coming up, and Eve was already in the hospital. Her Gwen Stacy moment has arrived.
As the world is still trying to repair itself after Angstrom Levy's army of alternate reality Invincible's ravaged it, Mark is the only hero in shape or of proper power level to take on Conquest. Eve wakes up after two days in the hospital and basically blows his identity to her parents to chat with Cecil. Oliver tries to help Mark, and is mauled and nearly torn in two. Eve later comes in and isn't so lucky, getting impaled on Conquest's arm in about a page. Despite a shattered leg and having taken a worse beating than Rocky Balboa did in ROCKY IV (if such a thing is possible), Mark vows bloody vengeance after Eve dies in his arms. Axing off a couple after they had JUST started to date and be happy with each other is a bit of a cliche, of course. In the letters page Kirkman seems to brace for about half a year of hate mail and claims he "had no choice" but to kill her off. Part of me thinks back to something Brian K. Vaughan said shortly after he killed Gert in RUNAWAYS: "I couldn't imagine Runaways without her, which is when I realized she had to die", in so many words. Writers have to do things to keep stuff fresh and often that is drastic, status-quo shattering stuff. Kirkman's done it a few times with Invincible, starting with the Omni-Man reveal and onward since then, which has propelled the title into the high ranks fans give it critically. From a story standpoint, it was a perfectly logical, in character situation. Eve would want to help Mark, despite being unable to walk on two broken legs. Conquest would not spare her.
In fact the only problem I had with it wasn't Eve's death itself, but who it was to. While it could change, right now Conquest isn't a villain; he's a threat, an opponent, someone to make Mark stronger to prepare him for the next arc. While not quite as shallow as Doomsday was, he isn't far removed. He's a nasty, easy-to-hate "absolute monster" type villain, but he's just a cipher. Methinks it would have felt a little more gut-punching had Angstrom Levy pulled it off, or some other villain Mark knew more. Right now Conquest is merely the second Viltrumite besides Nolan who's had the honor of being named before he is killed off. Of course Conquest could live; between the scar and the cybernetic arm, he seems to have survived his share of scuffles. He could be akin to a Bane done right; a villain who scores a major win immediately and actually doesn't fall flat right after. And I imagine that Kirkman wanted that sudden feeling of a threat out of nowhere icing Eve.
There always is the escape clause; these ARE superheroes. Atom Eve's mini raised the idea of it being POSSIBLE for her to meddle with flesh as she does other atoms, just it being hard. Angstrom Levy was deader than a doornail for quite a while, all but beaten to death on panel by Invincible, and he's very much alive. The Sequid/Mars subplot refuses to die. Between alternate realities and whatnot, it may not be the end for Eve. Of course, maybe it is. Life is tragic like that.
Kirkman promised a big issue, and he got it. Maybe I would be more shocked about it, but the death of a hero's girlfriend is rather old hat in the genre, and the hints of it was laid out for months. Considering Mark's ex's new BF has a habit of giving her shiners, I imagine a reconciliation is likely. It is a bit of a shame that Kirkman couldn't avoid the genre expectation completely, to kill his hero's girlfriend at some point. It was nice to see a happy couple in comics for a change; most couples in comics bicker, or are insane. It was actually more innovative for the perennial star-crossed lovers to finally hook up and have some bliss together. But, it adds to my theory that all comic writers secretly hate their wives (or at least are bitter about having been single so long beforehand, channeling some GLA logic), and can't wait to vent some argument over bills or missing the can by slaughtering some poor heroine. And anyone who thinks this is impossible should look up some interviews regarding Grant Morrison's inspirations for how he handled Frost and Jean in NEW X-MEN. How quickly did Gary's wife get axed off in WOLF-MAN (albeit THAT was to a worthy adversary), after all? It's a little predictable. Ladies should know by now that dating a superhero is never worth it.
If Conquest serves any role, it is to remind readers after an event where all of Image's heroes managed to kill an army of Invincible's that even one or two full powered Viltrumites coming to Earth would just destroy it instantly without Mark. For aliens who live thousands of years, Mark is still a bit of a baby to them at age 18-19 (Oliver would barely be an infant). Mark was benching 400 tons a few issues back (or, basically, 10% of Rulk's strength) and Conquest is mopping the floor with him.
Another entertaining, shocking issue, even if it lives up to some genre expectations. Can't wait for the epic showdown next issue!
I'm right there with you, only I'm not quite done with the book just yet. I think I'll stick around for at least a few more (I'll say 5 or 6--that's more than generous) issues to see if Kirkman can move past the predictable cliche's of stock comic hero development that he's written himself into, and set the stage to recapture the fun tone that hooked me onto the book to begin with. I know that he's got to get the grieving for Eve out of the way, so there won't be too much room for lighthearted stuff for at least a couple issues, but I'm hoping that Kirkman moves past that as soon as possible.....aaaaaand I'm done. If he can't figure out how to advance character development without [BLACKOUT]pointlessly stuffing the main character's love interest in the refrigerator, EXACTLY LIKE HE ALREADY DID IN WALKING DEAD[/BLACKOUT], then I've really lost interest. Especially since the whole reason I loved the comic was its more energetic and fun tone, and now the comic is going off the deep end into gritty angsty 90s-anti-hero bull****.
And to be frank, I really don't care about Conquest. Sure, Angstrom Levy won't exactly go down as comicdom's most memorable villain, but he at least had some character. Same with the Mauler Twins, and Powerplex, and most of the other villains that have shown up. But another big bad Viltrumite? How many of these guys are we going to go through?
I think I've finally found the words to express how I feel about this book now...I'm right there with you, only I'm not quite done with the book just yet. I think I'll stick around for at least a few more (I'll say 5 or 6--that's more than generous) issues to see if Kirkman can move past the predictable cliche's of stock comic hero development that he's written himself into, and set the stage to recapture the fun tone that hooked me onto the book to begin with. I know that he's got to get the grieving for Eve out of the way, so there won't be too much room for lighthearted stuff for at least a couple issues, but I'm hoping that Kirkman moves past that as soon as possible.
Sure, Mark has faced some emotionally dark situations since day 1, but it's gotten to be too much. I don't want to read 19 pages of depression. I want to read Invincible as it used to be; the fun action-adventure book that wasn't a sob story at its core like every other superhero comic on the shelves. Unfortunately, Eve was a large contributing factor to what used to make the book fun to read, so I don't predict that I'll keep buying it for very much longer.
Tough call really.
However, didn't Mark marry a redhead and have kids in the future before leaving planet Earth?
Or was that in an alternate time sort of like all the other Invincibles?
Just saying . . . Eve could always come back. It is a comic book.
Also, notice how Mark's ex is still with her abusive boyfriend in this issue.
I'm more upset in that it felt like Eve's intervention in the fight felt so cookie cutter and forced.
Like in comics, generally I think character death is fine. I think if its appropriate and it works it works. Here it really feels like Kirkman HAD to put in a big kill, and he had to kill off Eve. Eve's death almost felt arbitrary and poorly written.
Basically I'm not saying he should not have killed off Eve, but the way he did it was lame.
Didn't he do that with brain drain dude who died and then just came back?That's the thing though, Kirkman had taken what seemed to be all of the great things about comic books and wrote them in, but left out all of those things that were to cliche, overdone and just plain dumb in comics. Like killing off a character and bringing them back, because, hey, it's a comic book, anything can happen in a comic.
You know, if you people don't want to read it, you could just buy a copy and send it to those of us who can't afford it. I gots no problem with Eve dying. I just wish I had the chance to actually read it.
Ya bunch of privileged *****e bags.![]()