is this whole british airport thing a cover up?

PLAS

Avenger
Joined
Oct 5, 2000
Messages
21,084
Reaction score
0
Points
56
I remember five years ago, the preassure was felt in the air

when the Irak war started, the same tension could be felt

it's like we're living in 1986 all over again

but here's an honest question, I don't mean to accuse anybody of anything, but really, this conflict just does not feel real

what terrorist group has taken credit for all these actions?

what if it's just a cover up for something even bigger?

and no, I don't have any proof, because I'm not making any accusations

and no, anybody who knows me knows that I'm not that much of a conspiracy buff

it's just that the way all this stuff has developed, it's just not right

any other opinions

or even better yet, anyone articulate and informed enough to clarify all doubts surrounding these events?
 
what would be the purpose of stopping a fake terror attack...other than getting people to buy more consumer goods at the airport since they had to throw a lot away?????
 
I think it was a distraction by the terrorist to lead us off on another trail while they are planning something much bigger.
 
or the fact that there attention was taken form israeli plans to invade lebanon full scale?
 
it's obvious that attention wants to be taken elsewhere

but why?
 
ShadowBoxing said:
I think it was a distraction by the terrorist to lead us off on another trail while they are planning something much bigger.

which is a drastic mistep since now security will be tighter
 
roach said:
what would be the purpose of stopping a fake terror attack...other than getting people to buy more consumer goods at the airport since they had to throw a lot away?????

I dont think it was a fake attack. but certainly makes it easier to push through unwanted laws like ID cards, increased stop n search on the streets, that kind of thing.
an example. Stop n search is what it sounds like. the police can stop people and search them. on the street. Now, in 99% of cases, they have to have grounds to do so, such as if a white man with ginger hair, in a silver puffa jacket has been seen mugging an old lady, and they see a white man with ginger hair, in a silver puffa in the vicinity, they have grounds to stop, question and search him.
they cant just stop a black man cos they have heard there has been a mugging.(which used toi happen all the time).
Ohhhhh..unless you suspect him of being involved in a terrorist activity. then you can stop in the suspicion, with no other reason, and no other basis for that suspicion.

For a Government that is being accused of failing on Law & Order, its very hand to say that 95k crimes were reported, and there were 94k convictions. sounds great. unless 93k of the convictions were un reported crimes..if that makes sense...like a speeding conviction, possesion of a class c drug, that kinda stuff(unreported crimes), being used to massage the figures for crime solving
 
logansoldcigar said:
I dont think it was a fake attack. but certainly makes it easier to push through unwanted laws like ID cards, increased stop n search on the streets, that kind of thing.
an example. Stop n search is what it sounds like. the police can stop people and search them. on the street. Now, in 99% of cases, they have to have grounds to do so, such as if a white man with ginger hair, in a silver puffa jacket has been seen mugging an old lady, and they see a white man with ginger hair, in a silver puffa in the vicinity, they have grounds to stop, question and search him.
they cant just stop a black man cos they have heard there has been a mugging.(which used toi happen all the time).
Ohhhhh..unless you suspect him of being involved in a terrorist activity. then you can stop in the suspicion, with no other reason.

For a Government that is being accused of failing on Law & Order, its very hand to say that 95k crimes were reported, and there were 94k convictions. sounds great. unless 93k of the convictions were un reported crimes..if that makes sense...like a speeding conviction, possesion of a class c drug, that kinda stuff(unreported crimes), being used to massage the figures for crime solving
don't you all love totalitarian states?

they have this warm, cozy feeling to them, right?
 
PLAS said:
don't you all love totalitarian states?

they have this warm, cozy feeling to them, right?

And even if they don't really have a warm, cozy feeling to them you will agree that they do or face the consequences. :cmad:

jag
 
I like England, and im proud of our police and intelligence services, they saved a lot of lives yesterday
 
Did you know, that due to the anti globalisation protests turning into a riot a few years back, that the security forces in the UK can deem 3 or more people meeting to discuss something as an "illegal gathering", even if they are discussing something completely lawful.

and there is my old favorite. send two emails,from work to home, 10 mins apart.
first: subject Blair/Bush assasination plan. leave the main body blank
10 mins later:shopping list. leave the main body blank.

see which is first in your inbox at home. I know, because Ive tried it.
 
RogueLDN said:
I like England, and im proud of our police and intelligence services, they saved a lot of lives yesterday

Im quite sure the families of Jean Charles de Menezes and the two guys in Forest gate will agree wholeheartedly with that sentiment.

Jean Charles de Menezes. The guy held down at shot in the head, at point blank range, EIGHT times with no warnings, by the same police. His crime? well errr didnt commit one, actually.
 
logansoldcigar said:
Im quite sure the families of Jean Charles de Menezes and the two guys in Forest gate will agree wholeheartedly with that sentiment.

Jean Charles de Menezes. The guy held down at shot in the head, at point blank range, with no warnings, by the same police. His crime? well errr didnt commit one, actually.
they were speaking with a funny accent
 
logansoldcigar said:
Im quite sure the families of Jean Charles de Menezes and the two guys in Forest gate will agree wholeheartedly with that sentiment.

Jean Charles de Menezes. The guy held down at shot in the head, at point blank range, with no warnings, by the same police. His crime? well errr didnt commit one, actually.

Ah the guys who a few eeks before were rprotesting and inciting racial hatred with the guy dressed as a suicide bomber?

Did he die? No
 
funnily enough, de Menezes was Brazilian. the other two guys were british, but they did have big beards.

after de menezes was shot, the police released a series of statements about his behaviour on the day, and his imiigration status. all of which turned out to be rubbish. the guy was, according to eyewitnesses, held down and shot 8 times.
 
logansoldcigar said:
funnily enough, de Menezes was Brazilian. the other two guys were british, but they did have big beards.

after de menezes was shot, the police released a series of statements about his behaviour on the day, and his imiigration status. all of which turned out to be rubbish. the guy was, according to eyewitnesses, held down and shot 8 times.
aww, come on, it's not like I haven't been dropped to the ground in the middle of the street and then have a boot firmly planted in the back of my neck and a fully automatic assault rifle pointed at the back of my head, just for being outside during a massive shoot out between federal law enforcement agencies and the local drug cartel... a shoot out that took place on the other side of the town where I live, TWO HOURS AFTER THE SHOOT OUT

isn't that a nice and normal thing to happen to you?
 
RogueLDN said:
Ah the guys who a few eeks before were rprotesting and inciting racial hatred with the guy dressed as a suicide bomber?

Did he die? No

even if they were on that march, although im pretty sure they were not (a sun headline doesnt count as proof..), it doesnt make it acceptable. i was on the Iraq war protest march. does that make it accetable for them to shoot me, as long as i live?

or is it ok in your book for the plod to burst in someones house in the middle of the night and shoot him, ? if he didnt doesnt it makes it acceptable?

what when its your friend/neighbour/brother/sister that cops a bullet? will it still be ok?
 
logansoldcigar said:
even if they were on that march, although im pretty sure they were not (a sun headline doesnt count as proof..), it doesnt make it acceptable. i was on the Iraq war protest march. does that make it accetable for them to shoot me, as long as i live?
so its ok in your book for the plod to burst in someones house in the middle of the night and shot him, ? the fact he didnt die makes it acceptable?

what when its your friend/neighbour/brother/sister that cops a bullet? will it still be ok?
obviously, if it's for the sake of democracy and whatnot, superacceptable
 
GGVenomSandman said:
....i hate sand people....
TRaider.jpg

"ARrooooo...arr arr arrooooo!!!!"
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"