If it's not broke, don't fix it.
Now that's a perfectly fine argument.
At the same time, I'm kinda of the opinion, wouldn't it be kinda nice to see a different take on Batman? I mean, isn't it nice to have, say, Frank Miller's Batman
and Denny O'Neil's Batman in the comics? To be able to read and enjoy those decidedly different versions of the character in their own way?
I could see the same thing being the case for live action actors playing Batman. Bale made a fantastic realistic Batman in Christopher Nolan's Gotham. A troubled and lost young hero. Now what if we saw something else in JLA? A different Batman. More fantasy based, definitely.
I'm not saying it'll be better. But it'll be different. And sometimes it's a good thing to experience and enjoy different things.
Here's the Batman franchise, finally reborn with a tone and star the people actually like, when all the musical chairs casting is part of what killed the franchise in the first place.
No, Batman & Robin being a ****ing horrible movie is what killed the franchise in the first place.
Batman Forever - and certainly Batman Begins - did just swimmingly with a different actor playing Batman.
It doesn't matter seeing as to how you probably wouldn't hear any of it.
I'll hear whatever you have to say.
Well, maybe not you. But somebody intelligent. Get hunter rider to explain it.
I've heard a lot of bad excuses. And that you need an A-list highly marketable actor to play Batman isn't much of one.
But that isn't what I'm saying at all.
My "excuse", my argument is that if you make a JLA movie that's a quality film, and features an actor who turns in a quality performance as Batman, it will be a successful film both critically and commercially.
How can you even disagree with what I'm saying when it's glaringly obvious you don't even comprehend the words I'm writing? At least I understand your point of you.
And how can you call
me the ignorant, close-minded one when, again, you're the one who so far as been incapable of even understanding anything other than your own point of you? I understand what you're saying. I comprehend it. But I disagree. You can't even do that.
Christian Bale is popular in this role. Anticipation on the next movie is pretty high.
Agreed.
Why should popularity even matter? Look what that got us with Jessica Alba in Fantastic Four.
Popularity shouldn't matter. And it certainly doesn't matter when talking about quality. But you were talking about box office, I believe. Or, at least, public perception. And all I was saying was that, I believe, people would go to see another popular actor play Batman.
I think more often than not, casting who is right for the roles achieves far better results than casting someon because they are popular or "successful".
Agreed.
And if you cast a movie star as Batman, they bring a set amount of baggage to the role that will distract audiences from them playing the character as well.
Possibly. And I've never said a giant star
should be cast. Simply that, if they were cast, it's perfectly possible that they'd do as well as Christian Bale.
Daredevil would've been more successful if someone else other than Ben Affleck was playing the lead role.
Agreed.
. Her head would explode. Do you really want that to happen to Mom 
