Jurassic World - Part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
She so pretty.

Yeah I'm also not convinced about Pratt in this role. Saying that though, I'me not sure who you'd cast as a guy who rides with raptors.

Questionable plot ideas aside, I can't wait for this. My most anticipated film next year, and it has a pretty low bar set by 2 and 3.
 
I feel like since the role is so subdued it feels like, they were probably going for a Joel Edgerton/Joel Clarke/insert another Aussie here type, but Pratt pretty much showcased his ability to transform from goofball to brawny action start and it sealed the deal.
 
where in this trailer with that tone and music could they show Pratt's charismatic comedic lines?
 
All ya'll look alike. :argh:
 
Looks absolutely awful.

And Bryce Dallas Howard seems to be in every terrible major summer blockbuster. Spider-Man 3, Terminator Salvation, Twilight,etc.
 
Someone at work told me today I look like Chris Pratt. I mean, maybe his cousin or something..

 
B3TZmD4CIAAIiWf.png:large
No truer words. :cool:

the biggest suprise of the trailer was that Bryce is part of the action in the third act

Yep, I am very happy about this. Not to mention, she looks smoking hot in the trailer. :hrt:
 
that's the flare that is smoking hot

that's what flares do, man
 
They really are gonna have to upgrade the CGI. I know it is early, but it still looks pretty shaky.
 
Is this where a bunch of strangers tell ya you is handsome?

You are.

Vanity mf'er. :oldrazz:


This is not the purpose of the pic! Instead of compliments, I need to atleast hear "eh, you kinda do...sorta..." lol.
 
Alternate trailer:

[YT]vILCLTaZMx4[/YT]
 
Ive been saying this for the past 20years

Jurassic Park Sequel should be a prequel about how they Created the Dinosaurs!
That would bring back the excitment the entire creative process playing God being overwhelmed by excitment form what they done and not realizing the dangers.

How all the families living on the first Island Died and escaped and ends with the building of Jurassic Park as if Hammond believes they could contain them in cages.

The sequels were lame and this im holding Judgment on but it seems so cliche and rehashed.
Creating a monsterous spliced together of mass killing machines seems DUMB.
When the characters intentions are that stupid I dont care for what happens to them or anyone.

Like Prometheus.
 
Last edited:
Ive been saying this for the past 20years

Jurassic Park Sequel should be a prequel about how they Created the Dinosaurs!
How all the families living on the first Island Died and escaped and ends with the building of Jurassic Park as if Hammond believes they could contain them in cages.

The sequels were lame and this im holding Judgment on but it seems so cliche and rehashed.

If you include my character not dying from the first one, I can take your script to Spielberg. :o
 
It seems like the movie is going to try and balance a lot of elements. However, I have to admit that Chris Pratt on a motorcycle riding along with his raptor gang is pretty cool.
 
If you include my character not dying from the first one, I can take your script to Spielberg. :o


Whos your character?

The characters were all awful outside of the First film. But even Muldoon was mishandled being killed off. WHAT A WASTE!
and we get some old BORING game hunter in Lost World.

I swear, us the fans come up with better ideas.

Tame Raptors so far seems eye rolling kids stuff.
Ive never seen Lions hunt along side a human.

I enjoy the first film for making Dinosaurs animals not cartoon versions of themseleves.
 
The cgi does need work though. I can't believe the original still looks better.

20 years since then. Goddamn.
 
Even if it handicaps sequels, it's still a solid premise for the one film. The angle of "The dream of opening the park finally came true!" is genuinely new territory, even if what comes after (dinosaur chaos) may be more of the same. But that's a big part of the appeal of the JP franchise anyway. If sequels can't come up with something good that's a bummer, but that's the sequels' problem.

As long as the idea fuels at least one (hopefully good) film, it was worthwhile.

I will admit that seeing a fully functioning park is the one aspect this film has going for it. But after that it's really a case of where do you go? Even this film to a large degree is covering the same ground as the three previous movies. I can buy into the idea of the Park being re-opened once, but not twice. From there on all that's really left is once again people stupidly venturing into the islands, getting lost, eaten again and finally rescued. I think there's a reason Crichton was reluctant to write a second book and that is the concept of Jurassic Park doesn't lend itself well to multiple stories.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"