Lord of the Rings-Return of the King question

[TheJaberwock]

word. purists rule.

i sincerely hope you are not implying that peter jackson is a purist. the movies (especially ROTK) is anything but pure.

 

[Victarion]

i sincerely hope you are not implying that peter jackson is a purist. the movies (especially ROTK) is anything but pure.

Agreed.

They left out the best part of ROTK-Scourging of the Shire.

 

[Starscreamer]

Because Gandalf would've whooped his ass.

From the extended edition it was exactly the opposite. The Witch King owned Gandalf which bothered me greatly

 

[OptimusCannabis]

Cause he didn't in the book and Peter Jackson is not a studio tool.

And that is why he is my choice to direct a G.I. Joe movie or two.

 

[GhostPoet]

Um, yes, why did Sauron not return to his wicked armored form to fight the King? Also, there was supposedly footage of Aragorn fighting Sauron before the gates of Morannon, but looking at the map of middle eart, Morannon is a long way from Minas Tirith...

-Morzan

I believe I can answer this.

Sauron, on his second return said 'you know...I think it'd be pretty cool if I came back as a giant flaming eye."
and thus he did.

 

[Gilpesh]

Actually. Got the real answer.


Chuck Norris wouldn't let him.

 

[LastSunrise1981]

Agreed.

They left out the best part of ROTK-Scourging of the Shire.

Technically he didn't, he included it briefly in Fellowship of the Ring when Galadriel shows Frodo the future if he didn't succeed in his quest.

 

[Kevin Roegele]

Besides when the purist makes a movie so long.... it can't even be contained on one dvd... that's annoying.

He didn't make the film for DVD, he made it for the cinema.