Lighthouse
Fairness, Equality, Bacon
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2003
- Messages
- 14,809
- Reaction score
- 2,044
- Points
- 78
I heard this story on the radio yesterday.
http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyle/health/2010/05/11/2010-05-11_declining_sperm_counts_may_start_before_birth_due_to_environmental_issues.html
I have to be honest, when I heard this story, I thought that this might not be such a bad thing. I don't want us to run into the problem of extinction, but I think lowering the world population would be good for our planet. Add to the fact that so many people should not be having children in the first place.
http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyle/health/2010/05/11/2010-05-11_declining_sperm_counts_may_start_before_birth_due_to_environmental_issues.html
"Sperm counts are declining and there is mounting evidence that the problem starts even before birth," Dr. Gillian Lockwood, medical director of Midland Fertility Services in England, told the Daily Mail.
While the process of sperm production begins once a boy hits adolescence, important preparations are being made just before and after a boy's birth. If an expectant mother is exposed to smoke, pesticides, traffic fumes and plastics, this may adversely affect the future fertility of a male fetus.
Problems during the "window" of testicular development that starts before a baby's birth and ends in the first six months of his life could mean that he may never be able to father a baby. Some scientists call it a serious "public health issue" and others say it's as important as global warming. One science writer raised an interesting scenario: if scientists from Mars studied the male reproductive system, they may conclude that men were destined for extinction.
I have to be honest, when I heard this story, I thought that this might not be such a bad thing. I don't want us to run into the problem of extinction, but I think lowering the world population would be good for our planet. Add to the fact that so many people should not be having children in the first place.