So it's called 'irrational hate' to dislike michael jackson now. As i said earlier in the thread, i believe the testimonies of the people who claimed he sexually abused them when they were children.
How you can say this movie will be 'brutally honest, hiding nothing'(your words, not someone from the film festival), is beyond me, it is delusional.
His family are behind the movie and will not be showing mj sexually abusing children, or i guess, even climbing into bed with small boys, which he admitted he liked to do.
Does that sound brutally honest, no.
Sexually abusing children makes him a freak, not his too many nosejobs appearance, which i kind of feel sorry for him for, as he didn't want to have a big nose like his dad's, as he hated his dad for putting him through hell when he was growing up.
I don't think of him as a freak for that, i think of him as a freak because he was responsible for the sexual abuse of children.
Except he molested NOBODY. That's the honest truth. I've done my research. There was never any evidence of him having done it and, instead, a ton more evidence, proving his innocence that people like you tend to ignore.
The original accusation was the result of Evan Chandler, father of the original 'victim' Jordan, used his association with Jackson to get a bunch of "favors" out of him, including getting to work on Robin Hood Men In Tights as co-writer. When the favors stopped, Chandler got vindictive and, being a dentist, put his son under laughing gas and had him fabricate the allegation of being molested based loosely off details a trip where Jordan was with Jackson in Monaco where they were, in reality, both deathly ill with the flu (a doctor was even called!). From there, Chandler used that fabrication in a bid to extort money from Jackson (there's a phone recording where Chandler's heard all but admitting ahead of time it was a scam; dude sounded less like an angry parent wanting justice and more of a scammer out for money).
From there, the ONLY reason anyone believes MJ was guilty was because he settled out of court. Jackson was more than ready to go to trial and fight the allegations (which he later did in 2005), but his managers at Sony Music forced him to settle instead because of his upcoming concert tour for the "Dangerous" album would've been interrupted by the trial. Jackson, put in a bind, settled and made the money back in the first night of the tour; it was chump change to him at the time. However, it was due to the settlement that other families who were similarly associated with him decided to pull similar scams and made false accusations of their own to get money, and their testimonies ALL crumbed under the prosecution, which is why MJ was acquitted in 2005.
Long story short, the MJ allegations were nothing more than an extortion scam that turned into a witch hunt, and I'm still fuming that people still think he was guilty. Was Jackson childishly eccentric in a way that would come off as inappropriate at times? Yes. But everyone who knew him best, including ex-bodyguards, ALL said he would NEVER wrong kids and never had any sexual interest in them (quite the opposite; dude was doing women like he was it was going out of style according to them). And as for that Leaving Neverland documentary? It's already proven false as the two subjects interviewed were already proven as liars in court (Wade Robson defended MJ for YEARS and only changed his tune b/c he was hard up for money and Jackson's estate declined his involvement on the Vegas Cirque Du Solei show) and the director flat out admitted he fabricated a bunch of other things on it.
It really seems you're just angry at me just because I'm not blindly agreeing with you.