• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

movie doom vs movie magneto

i think doom was cooler. but magneto can control dooms body just like he did wolverines.
 
Well Magneto in the first two movies is MILES BETTER. I mean McKellan is an awesome actor and gives a brilliant performance. Machmon is a decent actor but Ian McKellan is on another level as one of the greatest British actors to ever live (see him play MacBeth or King Leer).

His Magneto is iconic and only second to Jack Nicholson's Joker in terms of movie villains (of superhero films). However, in the third X-Men movie he seemed rather bored. Only in his scenes with Patrick Stewart (who seemed equally bored in the non-McKellan scenes) did he liven up and give a stirring eccentric scene. But he seemed to know the script sucked this time and I doubt Ratner gave very good direction (he and Singer went back to Apt Pupil, another good performance for him) and other than that he only had second rate actors like Rodreguiez to work with as they steal his partner in crime (Rebecca Romjin) from him in this movie and betray a character relationship he built in the second.

However, with all the bumbling Ppenn and Ratner and Kinberg did with his character (almost ruining him) he still had an authenticity and a charisma at his most phone worthy send in. On the other hand Dr. Doom was screwed up from day one as a poor Green Goblin (comparetively he doesn't even match Willem Dafoe's brilliant and superb turn as the Green Goblin, which Kinberg copied and ripped off for his mediocre Fantastic Four script) with no depth or menace.

He was boring and compare Magneto's speech about no tolerance or land of peace to rogue in X1 or his defiance towards the X-Men in Lady Liberty's Head to....Marco Polo.

Case closed, then.
 
Oh and for a fight, movie Doom is a big piece of metal who he will rip into a thousand pieces too though.
 
if they fought just hand to hand no powers then doom kicks his ass for sure. you saw how hard he punched.
 
Is this even a question?
The movie Magneto is just as powerful and deep as his comic counterpart; the movie Doom is a metal skeleton with stupid electricity powers which do not even REMOTELY compare to the immensely layered, interesting and powerful DOOM from the comics.
 
Ben Urich said:
Is this even a question?
The movie Magneto is just as powerful and deep as his comic counterpart; the movie Doom is a metal skeleton with stupid electricity powers which do not even REMOTELY compare to the immensely layered, interesting and powerful DOOM from the comics.
comics magneto is much more powerful then the one in the movies
 
Movie Magneto was miles ahead of Movie Doom. Magneto was made into a powerful and believable character while Doom was just a generic everyday villian :mad:
 
I'd Say Magneto because in eht movie he could just tear doom apart since doom has a metal body.
 
well doom is younger, and magneto is like 100 years old lol
 
xii22_loop said:
well doom is younger, and magneto is like 100 years old lol

Doesn't change the fact that movie Doom is made of metal, which Magneto wields control over no matter his age.
 
web-king said:
doom is older. FF came out before xmen:D

Magneto was born at least 12 years or more before the Holocaust. I don't think that Doom was born before then :o
 
Well how about the fact that we should see Doc Ock in this instead. Ock is a great movie villain (so is GG....but too metall centric to survive unless he went unarmed....he could win....maybe) and his arms ARE RESISTANT TO MAGNETISM in the movie.....interesting, no?
 
DACrowe said:
Well how about the fact that we should see Doc Ock in this instead. Ock is a great movie villain (so is GG....but too metall centric to survive unless he went unarmed....he could win....maybe) and his arms ARE RESISTANT TO MAGNETISM in the movie.....interesting, no?
true. magneto cant control his arms but doom would still be able to shock the hell out of him.
 
In the movies = Magneto.

Now, if we were talking about the comics = Doom.
 
Dr.Dude said:
In the movies = Magneto.

Now, if we were talking about the comics = Doom.

That pretty much sums up my view as well.
 
Absorbing Nick Nolte would come in and beat them both to a fine pulp.
 
Obviously Magneto, since Doom's not only made of metal but his main power would only feed the magnetic field trapping him.
 
Since when can movie Magneto generate force fields? All I've ever seen him do is levitate stuff.
 
Cyclops said:
Since when can movie Magneto generate force fields? All I've ever seen him do is levitate stuff.
I didn't say anything about force fields. But obviously Magneto would have to generate a powerful magnetic field to immobilize Doom, & magnetism IS a form of electricity.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"