Movies that Defined the Decade ('00-'09)

cerealkiller182

Must Get Deadpool Avatar
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
12,957
Reaction score
0
Points
31
When you think about what movies defined the 60s/70s/80s/90s, plenty of examples come to mind almost immediately.

What about the last decade? Not necessarily significant to the craft/cinema (actually preferably not), but more in the realm of what defined us culturally/socially/etc.

My first three ideas Matrix (reliance and possible overwhelming of technology), Fight Club (revolt against consumerism and metrosexuality and the pent up aggression of stifled individuals), and American Pie (sexualized teenage years/desenstize towards youth sex).

I find that they really do define the last decade, only problem is they are from 1999.

I found it a little harder than I thought. I decided to keep thinking about the subject but wanted to throw out the topic to others.

Up in the Air is probably the most obvious one considering the downturn of the economy and the touchy subject matter of the film.

Black Hawk Down would be another. The concept of portraying our soldiers as flawed yet brave heroes in a horrible situation definitely defines the decades look at war. Much in the same way Sands of Iwo Jima (i think I have the right movie) with the unstoppable American soldier winning WWII and The Deer Hunter with its pyschologically scarred soldiers and seventh level of hell type war mirrors those decades attitudes as well.
 
Last edited:
Off the top of my head

Spider-Man - after 9/11 audiences wanted something hopeful and exciting that represented New York and what better way than 'ol Webhead.
 
I agree about the Matrix series. I would also say the superhero genre. The '00s were the decade for superheroes IMO.
 
Remakes. All of them. Showing that creativity in Hollywood is on life support.
 
I agree about the Matrix series. I would also say the superhero genre. The '00s were the decade for superheroes IMO.

I think that is significant only to cinema/the craft. Im thinking much more specifically towards the attitudes and memes that already define the decade but are portrayed through film.

Not necessarily good. Not necessarily successful.
 
The Lord of the Rings trilogy
 
Spider-Man, certainly. The first one, that is.

You can't avoid Lord of the Rings, but a bigger influence is Harry Potter. Look at all the attempted copycats it has fuelled; The Golden Compass, Percy Jackson, The Spiderwick Chronicles, The Dark is Rising, A Series of Unfortunate Events...every studio wanted a huge, multi-film franchise based on a best-selling childrenn's fantasy novel series.

And let's not forget Batman Begins. It rewrote the rulebook as far as revamps/reinventions go; suddenly there was nothing cooler than taking a brand new look at a famous character, and making it gritty, down-to-earth and as realistic as possible - with a greater backstory and more character development than before thrown in. Casino Royale followed the Begins method perfectly, and Ridley Scott's Robin Hood looks to be doing the same. The Incredible Hulk is pure comicbook but nevertheless takes Begins' idea of starting anew to a ridiclous degree (only five years after the first Hulk), and the new Spider-Man movie will do the same.
 
From a pure craft perspective, films like Children of Men and Zodiac come to mind, in terms of pop culture, I think the Naughties will be known as the Decade of Name Recognition because just about every major blockbuster in the last 10 years was an already existing property of some sort.
 
The Lord of the Rings trilogy
Are we talking about movies that are cherished and loved by movie critics? Because I've never heard the average moviegoer rave how good the LOTR movies are.
 
Really? I've rarely met a person who doesn't love LOTR.
Not everybody who likes genre sci-fi movies are into the fantasy/wizards/elves/trolls/magical stuff.

Outside of the U.S. nobody really cares for LOTR..........well that's my opinion anyway.
 
Can't speak for everyone but LOTR was voted Australia's favourite movie on a TV special 3 or 4 years ago. Number 2 was strangely Amelie.
 
The Bourne films were a huge influence on movies following it, especially the Bond reboot.
 
the superhero films defined summer at least.

it definitely was a reliance on franchises

the adaptions never bothered me, most good movies most people can think of were adapted from books or plays anyways going back to the beginnings of cinema, but remakes get old when there are still untapped sources of material to put effort towards.
 
Not everybody who likes genre sci-fi movies are into the fantasy/wizards/elves/trolls/magical stuff.

Outside of the U.S. nobody really cares for LOTR..........well that's my opinion anyway.

What? How does does that explain the billion dollars the third one made worldwide then? :huh: I guess no one around the world didn't love the first two so they didn't see the third one making it a billion dollars. :huh::huh:
 
Not everybody who likes genre sci-fi movies are into the fantasy/wizards/elves/trolls/magical stuff.

Outside of the U.S. nobody really cares for LOTR..........well that's my opinion anyway.

Yeah, I'm in England and only EVERYBODY loves LotR.
 
Well regarding LOTR's popularity, it might be big in the UK but I don't see these movies being huge in Spanish speaking countries.

I'm Hispanic so I know from experience that in South America the audience there can be very fickle when presented with movies that require them to believe in what they percieve as silly American storytelling, if it doesn't have visual action excitement you lose your audience.

Trust me I had a Hispanic co-worker who liked Batman & Robin because according to him it had more action.
 
Well, that's just poor movie taste. It still doesn't explain the fact that these films made over a billion dollars worldwide. Alot of people must like them then.
 
How did Lord of the Rings define us in the decade 00-09? It didnt. It was merely successful.
 
Well regarding LOTR's popularity, it might be big in the UK but I don't see these movies being huge in Spanish speaking countries.

I'm Hispanic so I know from experience that in South America the audience there can be very fickle when presented with movies that require them to believe in what they percieve as silly American storytelling, if it doesn't have visual action excitement you lose your audience.

Trust me I had a Hispanic co-worker who liked Batman & Robin because according to him it had more action.

...They thought LOTR was silly storytelling but Batman & Robin wasn't? .....Yeah....:csad:

And how is LOTR silly American storytelling? The story wasn't written by an American.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"