Movies205's Reviews and Discussion Thread, VOL 2.- THE SUMMER HAS RETURNED!

The Hero said:
I think it was a crime against humanity to cover William Dafoe's face(it's a hell of a lot scarier than the mask.And your right about Dunst.I agree with what someone else said somewhere in this forum:If Scarlett Johansson was better known at the time,she would of made a perfect Mary-Jane.

The biggest problem with the script is that David Koepp is just not a good screenwriter (so I guess you could say this is his masterpiece).Spider-Man a lot like Donner's Superman:The real strength isn't in the script,but in the sense of "feel-like-a-kid-again" wonder it creates.
Absolutely agree with you about the mask. It not only covers his face, but it doesn't even instill fear, due to it's goofy nature. And when the yellow eyes pull back, that just makes it look worse. Hopefully they'll think of something else to use for Harry Osborn as Green Goblin II. Or I'll be really mad.:mad:

Johansson? Possibly...my two ideal choices are Elish Cuthbert and Bryce Dallas Howard. Of course, the way life works, the redhead was cast as a blonde in the third Spidey film.:confused:
 
Spider-man 2
Directed by Sam Raimi
Starring Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, Alfred Molina, and James Franco
_________________________________________________________

This film does, generally, everything that the first installment did, but better, bigger, more dramatic, and more entertaining. So, yeah...you can say that I liked this one more. But, first, a synopsis from IMDB.com. - Peter Parker's having a rough time. His double life as the superhero Spider-Man is having a devastating impact on his civilian life. Things are so bad he declares that he's quitting, and never putting on the suit again. However, his sense of duty forces him to become a hero again when the brilliant scientist Dr. Otto Octavius is deformed in an accident and becomes Dr. Octopus. With four metal tentacles sticking out of his back, he'll prove to be a more than worthy opponent for Spider-Man. -

The acting in this film is considerably better than the last. Maguire carries the film well, and portrays the down-and-out superhero extremely well. From humor to drama, he pulls it off, unlike his first run-through. It's still not brilliant, but it's pretty damn good. Franco also does a better job as the now alcoholic, revenge-bent Harry Osborn, yet his tone is still too soft and, and plain unconvincing at times. Then we have, in my opinion, a massive miscast that stands out even more in this film than the first...Dunst as Watson was a bad choice. In the first, she had at least the red (not orange!) hair, and she was quite pretty. But in the second one, her hair becomes frayed, she looks too skinny, and she looks haggered. Also, there is almost no confidence in the character whatsoever. I'm not a shallow person, but MJ's looks have A LOT to do with the character. But, of course, there is an awesome counter-balance. Molina plays his part perfectly, with enough menace and sympathy to surpass the Green Goblin in pure entertainment, possibly thanks to no mask. But, either way, Molina captures his role well, and gives us and extremely enjoyable performance. The rest of the cast is still great, providing us fun, interesting characters throughout the film.

The story is...well, in my honest opinion, it's brilliant. It shows off everything that makes Parker/Spider-man so interesting. How HUMAN his character is. How even this super-hero can't pay the bills. How sometimes he gets fired, or how he lives in a crap apartement....things we don't see other superheroes do. The story is a general character study, and is fun, and enlightening, to watch throughout the entire picture. The script provides us also with an extremely interesting villain, and a great subplot between Harry and Peter. But, sadly, the film still thinks that this is a 'story about a girl', which it isn't....Spider-man's story has never been about that. Yet, it's still here, but it's at least handled better in this film.

The action scenes are simply some of the best I've ever seen. I'm telling no lie. They are a wonder to watch, and they seem so fluid...they are great to watch over and over again, and they don't look too perfect, like in such films as The Matrix: Reloaded. So, all in all, you get everything in a neat package. Great visuals, great symbolism, great characters, great dialogue, great story, great fights...the film is great. And that's that.

Fanboy Vote: 9/10
Final Vote: 8/10
 
Mr.Webs said:
Absolutely agree with you about the mask. It not only covers his face, but it doesn't even instill fear, due to it's goofy nature. And when the yellow eyes pull back, that just makes it look worse. Hopefully they'll think of something else to use for Harry Osborn as Green Goblin II. Or I'll be really mad.:mad:
I hate to break this to you,but....there isn't going to be a Green Goblin II.It's just going to be Harry on a glider,and it'll probably be limited to one scene.Yeah,I'm pissed too.
 
My Wrongs 8245-8249 and 117
Dvd
Dir: Chris Morris


This is a short ten minute film from 2002 Directed and Written by Chris Morris (brasseye, Jam) and stars Paddy Considine as 'Him' (Dead mans shoes, 24 hours party people).

Revolving around a depressed man who (probably, but nothing is certain here) has gone insane due to self-loathing, and his relationship with the dog who lives in the house that he is looking after, the film inspires equal parts of horror, dismay, and hilarity.

The film is a black comedy (like most of Chris` work) and in some parts its pretty sick and warped (i like that kind of stuff anyway)

The direction in it, is great doesn`t get boring at all (not hard seeing as its only 15mins long) and some nice angles. One of the best things about it is Paddys acting, ive become a big fan of his recently and think he is a great actor. In this short he did a nice job of portraying a man thats not quite right in the head (see Dead mans shoes for more examples of this), and seeing as most of his dialogue is with a dog, he pulled it off very well.

Funny film, sick in places, i loved it im going to buy it tomorrow.

9/10
 
The Hero said:
I hate to break this to you,but....there isn't going to be a Green Goblin II.It's just going to be Harry on a glider,and it'll probably be limited to one scene.Yeah,I'm pissed too.
......MOTHERF******, sonuva******, ****, *****, God****, *********, ******, **, ******, *****, *********, *********!!:mad:

....There better be a fourth one!:mad: I haven't waited this long to NOT see Green Goblin II!
 
black_dust said:
My Wrongs 8245-8249 and 117
Dvd
Dir: Chris Morris


This is a short ten minute film from 2002 Directed and Written by Chris Morris (brasseye, Jam) and stars Paddy Considine as 'Him' (Dead mans shoes, 24 hours party people).

Revolving around a depressed man who (probably, but nothing is certain here) has gone insane due to self-loathing, and his relationship with the dog who lives in the house that he is looking after, the film inspires equal parts of horror, dismay, and hilarity.

The film is a black comedy (like most of Chris` work) and in some parts its pretty sick and warped (i like that kind of stuff anyway)

The direction in it, is great doesn`t get boring at all (not hard seeing as its only 15mins long) and some nice angles. One of the best things about it is Paddys acting, ive become a big fan of his recently and think he is a great actor. In this short he did a nice job of portraying a man thats not quite right in the head (see Dead mans shoes for more examples of this), and seeing as most of his dialogue is with a dog, he pulled it off very well.

Funny film, sick in places, i loved it im going to buy it tomorrow.

9/10

I'm interested. To Amazon.com I go!

*Edit. I couldn't find anything.:(
 
Mr.Webs said:
......MOTHERF******, sonuva******, ****, *****, God****, *********, ******, **, ******, *****, *********, *********!!:mad:

....There better be a fourth one!:mad: I haven't waited this long to NOT see Green Goblin II!
I feel your pain,man.I still have faith in Raimi,but...how could he honestly think that fans would rather see Sandman and Venom than Harrygoblin?

About the mask,I think that if they were determined to go the helmet route,this would have been a much better design.At least it would have looked mildly intimidating.
 
Agreed, Hero, on all accounts. At least he wouldn't look like a Power Ranger villain.:(

And thanks, black dust. I'll be sure to check that out later.:up:
 
Mr.Webs said:
Agreed, Hero, on all accounts. At least he wouldn't look like a Power Ranger villain.:(
2006-03-28_225031_goblin02.jpg


Oh,Movie Goblin.Must you look awesome only in my fantasies? :csad:
 
XXX-2:State Of Union

Plot Summary

NSA Agent Augustus Gibbons (Jackson), fresh off the success of his last renegade recruitment, once again finds himself in need of an outsider. Gibbons and his new agent (Ice Cube) must track a dangerous military splinter group, led by Willem Dafoe, that is conspiring to overthrow the U.S. Government in the nation's capital.

---------------------------------------------------

Where do i start,to clear things up I'm not a movie snob i love a straight up action movie like Transporter but this is a terrible action film even at it's base roots
The story is as oft in these movies far fetched however this is slightly dumber than usual and the film isn't so much a film as it is a bunch of short expositional soundbytes linked together by action sequences
The dialogue is some of the worst Ive heard and the acting is crap,Ice Cube doesn't look like an action hero and is unconvincing in the fights,he isn't a bad actor but with a script this banal he opts for his snarly sub Mr T routine and is laughable in the romantic scenes with Mona Gaye
His co-stars are no better with Dafoe looking bored and Sam Jackson seeming content with the fact he gets to shoot a gun,Scott Speedman is the only one who seems to be trying at all
So when an action movie is this poor in plot and acting it looks towards 2 key features for redemption and that's a good lead hero and cool action....as you can tell no look on the former but sadly no look on the latter either with the action being unimaginative,poorly shot and messily edited
the movie doesn't contain one single "holy **** that was cool" moment and it should be noted it's budget is $130M,effects that look as shoddy as DTV movies are unacceptable at this level and the entire overblown and preposterous finale on the bullet train features some of the worst most laughable CGI this side of Escape from LA
Only 2 good things about this are Mona Gaye looking hot and the body armour Dafoe's soldiers wear,it's worth a better movie

This is the movie equivalent of genital warts...Avoid!

2/10
 
The Hero said:
I hate to break this to you,but....there isn't going to be a Green Goblin II.It's just going to be Harry on a glider,and it'll probably be limited to one scene.Yeah,I'm pissed too.

Where did you get that idea?

I was under the impression that Harry would make at least two scenes with the glider. And during the teaser trailer, he's wearing something green on his face.

:confused:
 
Flexo said:
Where did you get that idea?

I was under the impression that Harry would make at least two scenes with the glider. And during the teaser trailer, he's wearing something green on his face.

:confused:
Sam Raimi himself said that Harry wouldn't become another Green Goblin,he would just use Norman's technology.


HarryGG2.jpg



And given that we have at least two other villains in the movie,I doubt that it will last more than one sequence.
 
According to the rumors/guessings/"reports" that I've heard, Harry [BLACKOUT]attacks Spidey once, and then appears again at the end to participate in a four-way battle royale with Spidey, Sandman, and Venom.[/BLACKOUT]

Of course, the second part could be complete bull****, given that during the teaser, we see Harry next to the exploding pumpkin bomb.
 
So according to Amazon.com it'd cost $40.85 without shipping for Stargate (Ultimate Edition), Casino (Annivarsary Edition), and Before Sunset, I got all these DVDs today at various places for the grand-total(including tax) for $13.59, all brand-new. Casino I got $2.79 at circuit city when I asked for a price-match with Target which has it on sale for $4.
 
Movies205 said:
So according to Amazon.com it'd cost $40.85 without shipping for Stargate (Ultimate Edition), Casino (Annivarsary Edition), and Before Sunset, I got all these DVDs today at various places for the grand-total(including tax) for $13.59, all brand-new. Casino I got $2.79 at circuit city when I asked for a price-match with Target which has it on sale for $4.

Yeah, buying DVD's from Amazon is always a bad idea, unless you can't find them anywhere else.
 
Flexo said:
Yeah, buying DVD's from Amazon is always a bad idea, unless you can't find them anywhere else.

Amazon.com is a good place actually, there reliable and the prices are within a couple of bucks of the cheapest place.
 
Flexo said:
According to the rumors/guessings/"reports" that I've heard, Harry [blackout]attacks Spidey once, and then appears again at the end to participate in a four-way battle royale with Spidey, Sandman, and Venom.[/blackout]

Of course, the second part could be complete bull****, given that during the teaser, we see Harry next to the exploding pumpkin bomb.


No, you're right. That's how it'll play out. Harry in Goblin gear will be in two major scenes. Harry as himself will be in the film much more.
 
theShape said:
No, you're right. That's how it'll play out. Harry in Goblin gear will be in two major scenes. Harry as himself will be in the film much more.

Groovy. :up:
 
Green Street Hooligans (on DVD, saw it in a Film Club screening)
Directed by Lexi Alexander

Rotten Tomatoes Synopsis:
Matt Buckner (Elijah Wood) is a student who travels to London after getting kicked out of Harvard. Ostensibly there to visit his sister, Matt instead forms an unlikely bond with her husband's brother, Pete Dunham (Charlie Hunnam), who takes him to a soccer match to see his team, West Ham. At the game, the inevitable happens, and Matt's initial trepidation at the violence swelling around him soon turns into a pulse-racing, visceral thrill. Suddenly finding a taste for the hooligan life, Matt joins Pete's "firm," the Green Street Elite, leading to further booze-fuelled confrontations and providing an opportunity for Matt to keep a journal explaining why he's attracted to such a violent pursuit.

My Take:

This is a well acted, well shot film that definitely manages to pull off that "grit" when it needs to. However, it's rather derivative and a bit predictable throughout, and in the end you're left wondering if Matt's journey really meant anything. It just kind of "blahs" you at the end.

The one thing I will say is that the film exquisitely shows how human beings with perfectly decent lives, desk jobs, girlfriends, and a speck of class (watch the subway scene midway through the film) can involve themselves in and be consumed by such idiocy. It's pretty fascinating in that regard.

In the end, the film won't be staying in my heart whatsoever, but it was entertaining and well made, and I was able to find some mildly profound things in it.

7/10, B
 
Memento (2000)
Director: Christopher Nolan
9/10

There are a lot of excellent movies whose scripts rewrote the rules of cinematic storytelling (the Oscar-winning "The Usual Suspects" and "Pulp Fiction" are two good examples). "Memento" deserves a place among those films: it's the most complex, original, innovative, intriguing achievement to hit the big screen in a while. "Memento" looks like an ordinary film noir, having all the conventional elements (femme fatale, unreliable characters, ambiguous protagonist/narrator, bleak ending), until is fatally strikes you with its originality and audacity, making you unable to stop watching. Director Christopher Nolan manages to pull off a rare feat in the film business these days by taking the entire industry by storm with his incredible intelligent, disjointed thriller "Memento". It remains one fo the most unique and thought-provoking pieces of the past decade.

From the beginning you realize you're not watching the usual thriller: the reversed opening sequence is a fascinating narrative choice, and even more fascinating is the director's decision to tell the whole story backwards, with each separate scene ending where the previous one began. Thanks to this trick, the audience is as confused as the movie's main character, Leonard Shelby (Guy Pearce), a peculiar DIY detective who wants to find the man who raped and killed his wife. While attempting to save his wife during the attack, "Lenny" sustained a head injury and has lost his short-term memory, so every new event is gone from his mind after 10 minutes. He has to go on with his life by taking notes, snapping Polaroids and putting tattoos all over his body. He also gets some valuable help from a cop, "Teddy" (Joe Pantoliano), and a barmaid, Natalie (Carrie-Anne Moss). But should he really trust them, given he can't almost even trust himself due to his neurological condition. Nolan (who screenwrote the film as well) knows how to build up the tension, as well as add emotion, with the touching parallel story of Sammy Jankis (Stephen Tobolowsky), a man with the same disease as Leonard.

Both Pearce and Tobolowsky are superb as the two troubled men: the former makes you feel as uneasy as he does almost immediately, and he's got some really ace lines ("How am I supposed to heal if I can't feel time?"); the latter, on the other hand, is heartbreaking, his experiences make us wanna cry before the film's over. Pantoliano and Moss are very impressive too, their true intentions remaining unclear until the end. Nolan beautifully intertwines the present and the past, linking events together like a detective putting all the clues together until the thief is found. While "Memento" is thoroughly composed with its intertwining plot, the film's great strength can also be considered it potential flaw. The confusion that is inevitable can make it difficult for some to follow, especially for those who are used to a film flowing over them in a passive way. Memento requires you to exercise your brain and even when it is all over certain questions will still remain and further viewing is essential. Of course, the central paradox of the film should not be forgotten, this is a revenge story but of course the character has now way of remembering the actual crime, his memory is gone and the memory of the act of revenge will also be a fleeting one. Nolan's story and the ensemble cast's acting are outstanding, but a mention also has to go to the cinematography and soundtrack that both helped greatly to create the oppressive mood that pervaded throughout he film and is essential to generate the sense of fragility that exists in Leonard's connection to the world. An intelligent, profound, and supreme addition to the genre.
 
The Machinist (2003)
Director: Brad Anderson
8.5/10

I was skeptical at first to see how Christian Bale would do with dropping 65 pounds to play the role of Trevor Reznik, an insomniac factory worker with a forgotten secret. Bale, by dropping the weight, accomplished what so many "physical" actors can only dream about. He gave depth, a physical persona, and a very frightening image to this character that took us away from Bale the actor. Throughout the entire film, I could only see Trevor Reznik. Perhaps it was a trick. Perhaps Bale couldn't do the character otherwise, but for me, a viewer of the film, it helped create the dark ambiance that shook me to the core until the very end.

My first applaud goes to director Brad Anderson for his simplistic, yet chaotic filming of this story. Throughout the entire viewing, you are given this impression that something is going over your head. You know that you are missing something and that the ending will shock and amaze you. For anyone that has grown up in the Usual Suspects or Sixth Sense era, you can smell this film coming from a mile away, but it is the way that Anderson provides the story to you that will keep you on the edge of your seat until the very end. After a vast array of "shock-ending" films, it is hard to come up with a new, original, and tactful idea that will keep audiences talking long after the credits roll. Anderson has done a brave new job with The Machinist in providing that chatter after the film. He showed us his darker side in Session 9 and he doesn't go too commercial in this film. It is haunting, riveting, and challenging all at the same time ... to say that about a director's work is rare today.

The acting is superb. Jennifer Jason Leigh again gives us the beauty of grime and the ability to transform this very small character into a powerhouse role. She gives so much emotion and humility to her character, which makes you forget (or perhaps not notice) what her true "profession" is. There are also so many secrets about her that you cannot help but sit around after the film and think of her story outside of how she reacts with Reznik. Then you have John Sharian playing the polar opposite of Bale in such a frightening way that he nearly steals every scene away from Bale. He is huge, bulky, and rather transfixing as perhaps the living conscious of Bale. Following Leigh's feminine role is that of Aitana Snchez-Gijn playing Marie. This very unknown character that seems to be the only smiling face in the film. She gives comfort to not only Reznik, but also to us. She is our guiding light at the end of this dark tunnel that surprises you to the very end. Then you have everyone that is around Reznik like his co-workers, his landlady, and even himself. A powerful cast that is accentuated with a bold and original story.

Finally, I would like to say that outside of the talented acting and bold direction, you actually have an amazing story. I know I have mentioned this several times, but you cannot walk away from this story without discussing it thoroughly with friends and family afterwards. It is like a cinematic drug that you cannot get enough of. I thought that with my second viewing that I would have already seen all that I could, but instead I was provided with moments, mere glimpses of truth, that I just completely missed during the first viewing. It was inspirational to see such dark, yet powerful storytelling to come from a nearly recycled Hollywood. Sure, there are elements of Fight Club, Sixth Sense, and Usual Suspects all mixed into this film, but Anderson gives it his own flare. Bale goes to a new extreme proving that he can manage both big box office hits, and these itty-bitty gems.

Overall, I really thought this was a powerful film. Christian Bale is becoming such a strong actor, because he is constantly working with the quintessential directors in Hollywood. Not the Bruckheimers, not the Bays, but with these smaller directors that are not afraid to take a leap of faith with Bale. I have not been disappointed with his work, and I think all that watch this film are going to walk away and see Bale as more than just the "man in a bat suit", but instead a strong voiced actor that can tackle any role.
 
War Party said:
The Machinist
Director: Brad Anderson
8.5/10

I was skeptical at first to see how Christian Bale would do with dropping 65 pounds to play the role of Trevor Reznik, an insomniac factory worker with a forgotten secret. Bale, by dropping the weight, accomplished what so many "physical" actors can only dream about. He gave depth, a physical persona, and a very frightening image to this character that took us away from Bale the actor. Throughout the entire film, I could only see Trevor Reznik. Perhaps it was a trick. Perhaps Bale couldn't do the character otherwise, but for me, a viewer of the film, it helped create the dark ambiance that shook me to the core until the very end.

My first applaud goes to director Brad Anderson for his simplistic, yet chaotic filming of this story. Throughout the entire viewing, you are given this impression that something is going over your head. You know that you are missing something and that the ending will shock and amaze you. For anyone that has grown up in the Usual Suspects or Sixth Sense era, you can smell this film coming from a mile away, but it is the way that Anderson provides the story to you that will keep you on the edge of your seat until the very end. After a vast array of "shock-ending" films, it is hard to come up with a new, original, and tactful idea that will keep audiences talking long after the credits roll. Anderson has done a brave new job with The Machinist in providing that chatter after the film. He showed us his darker side in Session 9 and he doesn't go too commercial in this film. It is haunting, riveting, and challenging all at the same time ... to say that about a director's work is rare today.

The acting is superb. Jennifer Jason Leigh again gives us the beauty of grime and the ability to transform this very small character into a powerhouse role. She gives so much emotion and humility to her character, which makes you forget (or perhaps not notice) what her true "profession" is. There are also so many secrets about her that you cannot help but sit around after the film and think of her story outside of how she reacts with Reznik. Then you have John Sharian playing the polar opposite of Bale in such a frightening way that he nearly steals every scene away from Bale. He is huge, bulky, and rather transfixing as perhaps the living conscious of Bale. Following Leigh's feminine role is that of Aitana Snchez-Gijn playing Marie. This very unknown character that seems to be the only smiling face in the film. She gives comfort to not only Reznik, but also to us. She is our guiding light at the end of this dark tunnel that surprises you to the very end. Then you have everyone that is around Reznik like his co-workers, his landlady, and even himself. A powerful cast that is accentuated with a bold and original story.

Finally, I would like to say that outside of the talented acting and bold direction, you actually have an amazing story. I know I have mentioned this several times, but you cannot walk away from this story without discussing it thoroughly with friends and family afterwards. It is like a cinematic drug that you cannot get enough of. I thought that with my second viewing that I would have already seen all that I could, but instead I was provided with moments, mere glimpses of truth, that I just completely missed during the first viewing. It was inspirational to see such dark, yet powerful storytelling to come from a nearly recycled Hollywood. Sure, there are elements of Fight Club, Sixth Sense, and Usual Suspects all mixed into this film, but Anderson gives it his own flare. Bale goes to a new extreme proving that he can manage both big box office hits, and these itty-bitty gems.

Overall, I really thought this was a powerful film. Christian Bale is becoming such a strong actor, because he is constantly working with the quintessential directors in Hollywood. Not the Bruckheimers, not the Bays, but with these smaller directors that are not afraid to take a leap of faith with Bale. I have not been disappointed with his work, and I think all that watch this film are going to walk away and see Bale as more than just the "man in a bat suit", but instead a strong voiced actor that can tackle any role.

It was great to see Bale's talents put to good use in this film.
 
Edd Extraordinaire said:
It was great to see Bale's talents put to good use in this film.

Yeah, Bale is one of my favorite actors and he was great in this film. I can't wait for the Prestige.
 
I just saw Elephant Man (1980) excellent movie, John Hurt turns in a performance that makes my list of favorite performances which is as follows, in no particular order:

1. Alex Guiness in "A Bridge On the River Kwai"
2. George Sanders in "All About Eve"
3. Toshirô Mifune in "Seven Samurai"
4. JohnHurt in "Elephant Man"

These performances WRECK your ****!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"