Natalie Portman Might Play a Hooker

The Apatow Crew

New God
Joined
Mar 13, 2005
Messages
100,339
Reaction score
0
Points
31
Natalie Portman Might Play a Hooker

Aug
07
2006
| Posted in Gossip at 7:25 AM

natalie_portman_johnny_postal.jpg

Natalie Portman is currently reading for the part of a troubled hooker in the dark Universal romantic comedy “Johnny Postal.” If she bags the role, she’ll be working with some rock legends. Director Frank Callo has Debbie Harry, who gained fame as the frontwoman for punk band Blondie, appearing as a “sex-crazed, biker ***** past her prime” and David Johansen, aka Buster Poindexter, as a tough post office manager. Also starring in the film, which begins shooting in New York and New Jersey this fall, is Grammy-winning deejay Roger Sanchez as a “drug-dealing bad-ass pimp.”
I know that having Natalie Portman and the word “hooker” in the same sentence sounds like fun, but don’t expect to see her naked on film anytime soon. You’ll have to wait for a red carpet wardrobe malfunction, which I’m sure will happen someday.

http://yeeeah.com/blog/2006/08/07/natalie-portman-might-play-a-hooker/

i'm sure this will catch everyone attention.
 
must...... hesitate .........from posting a joke!!!....
 
Yeah, I read about that earlier. I think she has the chops to pull it off. She was an excellent stripper.
snl_02.jpg

She's been picking alot of great roles lately.
 
but you know people are gonna say how can you be a hooker and not get naked?
 
J Alba's Lover said:
but you know people are gonna say how can you be a hooker and not get naked?
She'll get a body double. Or maybe she'll do it herself. What ever choice she makes is going to be the right one.
 
well one then could go down the route if your not gonna do a certain thing then why even except the role?
 
Tangled Web said:
Yeah, I read about that earlier. I think she has the chops to pull it off. She was an excellent stripper.
snl_02.jpg

She's been picking alot of great roles lately.
looks like kiera knightly there...............domino

xwolverine2 , I do not approve.
:eek:
your approval means ****
 
J Alba's Lover said:
well one then could go down the route if your not gonna do a certain thing then why even except the role?
She can be a convincing hooker with out having a nude scene. Just implied nudity and sexuality. This role seems to be much more than graphic hooker scenes.
 
Tangled Web said:
She can be a convincing hooker with out having a nude scene. Just implied nudity and sexuality. This role seems to be much more than graphic hooker scenes.
yes but do people alwaysassume about hooker? same could be said for strippers also?
 
J Alba's Lover said:
yes but do people alwaysassume about hooker? same could be said for strippers also?
Her character isn't just a two dimensional hooker. It looks like it's more about a woman turning her life around than a hooker ****ing guys for money. That requires good acting not explicit nudity. Yeah, she'll still act sexy and all but it's not just about that.
 
J Alba's Lover said:
She doesn't approve of her own movie?
No. What she doesn't approve of is gawking over a few seconds of film from a very important movie. It takes that scene out of context.
 
all i'm saying is when people think and hear hooker they assume that.
 
Darth Elektra said:
Lol, Your awsome!
i love you

No. What she doesn't approve of is gawking over a few seconds of film from a very important movie. It takes that scene out of context.
she was gonna sleep with a pedophilic bishop:confused:

whats out of context again?:confused:
 
Tangled Web said:
No. What she doesn't approve of is gawking over a few seconds of film from a very important movie. It takes that scene out of context.
Ahhh your a very funny person.

"A very important movie"

it was a good movie but don't make it out to be this big thing in the history of time.
 
J Alba's Lover said:
all i'm saying is when people think and hear hooker they assume that.
Yeah, they also assume that hookers suck guy's ***** and spit it back at them, do you expect her to do that on film? If she doesn't want to do nudity she doesn't have to.
If you're the director would you rather have Natalie Portman who won't do nudity or a Paris Hilton who will do nudity.

xwolverine2 said:
whats out of context again?
What I'm saying is that she made that movie for people to question the line of what justifies violents and to raise political awarness, not for some fan boys to gawk over an upskirt.
 
J Alba's Lover said:
Ahhh your a very funny person.

"A very important movie"

it was a good movie but don't make it out to be this big thing in the history of time.
Are you kidding? This is probably the most politically relevent film this year outside of Inconvinient Truth.
 
J Alba's Lover said:
Ahhh your a very funny person.

"A very important movie"

it was a good movie but don't make it out to be this big thing in the history of time.
WHAT!?!!?

THE MOVIE WAS IN***INCRDIBLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!AHALAAFHABLJKF!!!!!!

u suk!:o
 
Tangled Web said:
Yeah, they also assume that hookers suck guy's ***** and spit it back at them, do you expect her to do that on film? If she doesn't want to do nudity she doesn't have to.
If you're the director would you rather have Natalie Portman who won't do nudity or a Paris Hilton who will do nudity.
now i did not say that. i said when people in general hear it. you don't have to get all bent out of shape about it. if she does take the role. your gonna hear a lot more harsh stuff said. and i never said anyone should be foreced to do nudity. cause whe na role genreally requires nudity and there is none the people who watch the movies get mad and they probably don't believe that person is suppose to be what there playing.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,164
Messages
21,908,472
Members
45,703
Latest member
BMD
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"