Repeatedly and frustratingly grounded by heavy-handed storytelling.
Neill Blomkamp's sophmore effort proves that District 9 was no fluke, with Elysium the kind of exciting and intelligent entertainment that's been sorely missing from the summer movie season.
really didn't like that Film.com review, and i say this as someone who has no problem with the other negative reactions or caveats so far, but it's like he got so caught up in how much the political aspect of the movie bugged him, he didn't bother trying to fully appreciate all the other things about the movie that were worth appreciating. and what blockbuster this summer didn't have heavy-handed storytelling? and, in fact, most blockbusters in general tend to...it's not a big deal to me as long as the film works effectively enough as a cool action flick. and yet the critical circle jerk has already settled on "heavy-handed" as the one major negative to keep throwing Elysium's way, over and over and over...and i'm not saying that's not a valid criticism, just that i get tired of critics towing a party line, and also that i feel like maybe Elysium is getting more points deducted for its heavy-handedness than other movies would because it contains some sociopolitical elements or maybe because of higher expectations. take the Slant review, they seem to desperately want the film to be great and actually have a lot of great things to say about it, but because the character arcs don't take as many risks as they'd like--risks you wouldn't find in 99% of most summer blockbusters, btw, but because this is from the director of District 9 it's like they were hoping for more moral ambiguity--they end up giving it a 2.5 out of 4 and RT counts it as "rotten."
yeah, it's frustrating for me because i like to read reviews on both sides but so often one early review might use the term "heavy handed" and then you see it regurgitated over and over again in subsequent negative reviews or parts of reviews. and the same thing happens on the positive side, as reviewers laud Elysium's visuals but only a few of the reviews pick up on other aspects they'd like to praise. for a group of people that like to harp on the lack of originality in current film, movie critics sure are an unoriginal lot, by and large. but i keep reading in hopes of finding those reviews with some true, distinct insight, positive or negative, that i can have intellectual discourse with in terms of how my own opinion of the film interacts with theirs.
Oh yeah I hear you, the way RT works is odd, I know reviews get to say if they think it is rotten or fresh but some site can score a 3/5 and say fresh and another 3/5 and say rotten, so its highly subjective and open to interpretation and manipulation.
And I would never judge going to watch it at the cinema from a review, thats just mad, unless maybe every single person panned it, critics and fans. But there are very films that bad.
So this is Man of Steel all over again.
How many Oscar nominated films are even good? That they might be remembered beyond that award season?About RT % many Oscar nominated movies are below 79%
Did I mentioned to you guys that I've seen Elysium last year. August I think.
I liked...but the third act needed work. Tons of work. Hopefully they fixed it during the reshoots in Dec. Let's say there's a plot beat that makes you HATE Matt Damon's character. PM me if you want details. Hopefully I'll get back to you since I"ll be at Comic Con tomm. Plus the last fight scene had shakey camera galore. Again, I hope they fixed that too.
I give it a B minus. Creative and tangible world, but very light on the characters. And more Kruger wouldn't hurt either.