New Interview with Alan Ritchson talking about TMNT

TigerClaw

Mutant Tiger
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
1,108
Reaction score
0
Points
56
New Interview ith Alan Ritchson talking about TMNT
http://www.blankmaninc.com/alan-ritchson-interview/

Here's the part he talks about TMNT.

BMi: Speaking of huge movies… you are starring as Raphael in the upcoming Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles movie. The Turtles fanbase is rabid and they’ve been skeptical of the film ever since it was first announced. What can you tell fans to let them know everything is going to be alright?

AR: From the early leaked scripts, where it’s like an alien generation of this story less true to the origin story, and people thinking the entire time that that’s what this film is going to be about…has sort of been on the forefront of my mind while we’re working on this. The internet’s a dangerous place because people believe what they read and they cling to it as truth and they can assault you with that as if it were real. It’s been frustrating in the sense that people are already dogging the movie and they’ve been dogging it before it was in production. They’ve already written it off as a Michael Bay failure but what people don’t know is that this story is actually really great. Having grown up with it myself, I think we’ve honored the origin story and those diehard fans that want to see the best of what the turtles have to offer. It has been incredible to see the attention this film has been getting. I think we set a record for trailer views the first week the trailer was released. Thirty one million views in a week just for the trailer. People want to see the turtles, they want to see what they look like and they want to see that world.

Another thing, once that trailer was released a lot of people were unhappy with the way that they looked, complaining that they didn’t look like the turtles in the tmnt 2014(1990) film or from the comics. They’re more kind of a humanized version. I can say that I’m pretty certain that there’s a really good reason that they look the way they do and in order for us to really bring the turtles to life with the technology that we have in a way that’s never been done before, which is trying to capture the nuances of a human performance, and copy and paste that onto a turtle there was no other way than to humanize their face a little bit because a traditional turtle’s mouth couldn’t be translated into that human DNA. There’s no way to make that performance translate and what we’re trying to do is to create a truer more real life performance. The look has to do with the fact that we’re trying to get the most nuanced human performance possible which is what somebody is going to relate to when they feel like these guys are a living, breathing thing. I think people, once they connect with these characters and they see how real that experience is, I think all will be forgiven. Honestly, I’m proud of the product that’s being put out there. I think it’s going to be a lot of fun and I think a lot of people are really going to enjoy it.

BMi: Raphael was a huge part of the original 1990 film’s plot because he really did have the most character development in that film. What do you think has been the biggest difference between that character and your portrayal?

AR: In a lot of ways it’s still the same character. He’s still the angry hothead who’d rather take action than think about the implications of that action so in a lot of ways we’re still telling a lot of the same story. I think what we tried to do was to reach deeper and find other layers to these characters so they’re not so “one note”. I think in the past everybody sort of plays a caricature, like one dimension of humanity in a sense. I just think that the individuality and the depth of Raph and the turtles in this story is much, much richer. That’s something that we as actors focused on and I think it’s supported by the technology that’s helping to bring that story to life and the script that we ended up working with ultimately. It’s still a fun action/adventure movie but there’s a lot of heart and truth to the character that I think hasn’t really been expressed on film before.
 
Last edited:
Very cool :yay:
tumblr_inline_n3vf70Sp6H1rmbz23.gif
 
"The internet’s a dangerous place because people believe what they read and they cling to it as truth and they can assault you with that as if it were real. It’s been frustrating in the sense that people are already dogging the movie and they’ve been dogging it before it was in production. They’ve already written it off as a Michael Bay failure but what people don’t know is that this story is actually really great. Having grown up with it myself, I think we’ve honored the origin story and those diehard fans that want to see the best of what the turtles have to offer."

I had to take offense to that. The reason people have been so dogmatic about this film is because:

1. Michael Bay started it from the get-go and then he pissed off the fans by basically spitting in their eye and then retract his previous statement to get back into their good graces. Also, because his name and Platinum Dunes were attached as producers, many fans were reluctant to give it a chance because they've seen too many crappy remakes of beloved horror films not to mention they aren't big fans of his "Transformers" franchise or most of his filmography in general. The same goes for Liebsman and his filmography. And there are some fans who just don't like Megan Fox as an actress. It also can be said about the odd casting choices as well.

2. The Blue Door script. That really scared/turned fans off and some things have ended up being used in this current script/film.

3. How have they 'honored the origin story?' When was April's dad involved in the creation of the Turtles? Also, from the sounds of things, the Lego sets, and the trailers themselves, it shows the ooze was created in a lab somehow as a way of 'creating heroes' which then means--- does the movie negate the alien aspect. Does T.C.R.I stand for some different acronym or is there more to April's father or Shredder? Is one of them an alien? Plus, there's the matter of Splinter and Shredder. No Hamato Yoshi or Oroku Saki (unless they're referred to on Eric Sachs' scroll/tapestry.) No Tang Shen. No Turtles falling down a drain into the sewers after a kid's fishbowl smashes.

Granted, the Turtles have gone through many changes in every iteration but to say they've honored the origin is laughable at best.

4. The plenteous changes made and unnecessary additions have rubbed fans like me the wrong way while others have accepted them.

5. The marketing for this film hasn't really mollified the concerns, doubts, and pessimism I have for this movie as well as others'. Yeah, an actor or director can go out and say, "This is going to be the best Turtles movie ever" but you need a lot more to back that claim up. From what I've seen, this movie will no doubt showcase the Turtles doing things they never could do previously with the Jim Henson suits, but to me I like what worked in the past--- the designs of the characters, the fact that they didn't have to literally wear their personalities on their sleeves but just be who they are as individuals, the Foot Clan were ninjas, Shredder was a Japanese man, and Splinter originated from Japan thanks to his master Hamato Yoshi (in some cases it was Yoshi himself who turned into a rat) but nonetheless... it all worked for me. It all comes back to nostalgia for me; what worked in the past shouldn't dramatically be changed or tinkered with. If you want to change anything, do it subtly ala the Nickelodeon show by adding freckles on Mikey's cheeks or making Donny buck-toothed. Eye color. Raph's cracked shell.

Like I said, this movie will certainly have its visuals to wow people and it may break even or gain back its budget, but at the end of the day... will it be as memorable as the 90's movies? Will it be better or will it be remembered for being a flop/stinker? Guess we'll see.
 
...yeah I agree with all the above. Oh and:

6. Megan Fox.
 
"Honored" doesn't mean a direct copy of the origin we saw in the cartoons or comics. Your complaints about Liebsman as the director and Megan Fox is exactly what he's talking about with fans assuming they know what's going on and dismissing the movie based on those assumptions.
 
Well I'm still looking forward to this. I just want to see more. They aren't showing us a damn thing and it's getting annoying
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"