New proof of Yeti.

The excitment of this footprint will go on for a couple of days, then die down. Then we'll hear about something else 6 months from now. This process will continue untill we get better evidence.
 
I think more than ever they're getting closer to proving the existence of Bigfoot. Sasquatch, Yeti, and Bigfoot are the same things with different names and have gone on for a very long time with no dead bodies, bones, or any real physical proof that they exist.

There has been reports of blood, saliva, scat, hairs, and other forms of DNA that were found that came with the results of an unknown primate. However, a really good picture or a body will put the skepticism to rest. I'm a firm believer in Bigfoot and believe that they're definitely out there. For the longest time the Panda Bear was considered a myth until it was proven to be a real animal.

Footprints aren't going to prove anything anymore. People need to stop creating hoaxes and actually take this seriously. If a Bigfoot is found or the body of a Bigfoot is found, it will be the biggest reveal in scientific history as far as I'm concerned.
 
We have many brown bears and mountain lions here in the woods where I live... a substantial population of each.
I spent A LOT of time in the woods in my younger years. I've never seen either. I've heard a mt lion scream and seen it's prints but that's all. I imagine a primate could be much more elusive if trying or part of their normative behavior.
 
We have many brown bears and mountain lions here in the woods where I live... a substantial population of each.
I spent A LOT of time in the woods in my younger years. I've never seen either. I've heard a mt lion scream and seen it's prints but that's all. I imagine a primate could be much more elusive if trying or part of their normative behavior.

Where do you live?

Wouldn't you agree that confusing a bear with a primate is pretty weird? I'd like to think one would know the difference between a bear and a primate that has human features.

patterson_bigfoot.jpg


I definitely think they're out there. When or how we find them is a different story.
 
I'm still pretty skeptical about bigfoot. Untill we get better proof, I say any evidence is just a hoax or it's just a coincidence.
 
Where do you live?

Wouldn't you agree that confusing a bear with a primate is pretty weird? I'd like to think one would know the difference between a bear and a primate that has human features.

patterson_bigfoot.jpg


I definitely think they're out there. When or how we find them is a different story.

You do know the guy who filmed this said he hoaxed it right?
 
I think more than ever they're getting closer to proving the existence of Bigfoot. Sasquatch, Yeti, and Bigfoot are the same things with different names and have gone on for a very long time with no dead bodies, bones, or any real physical proof that they exist.

There has been reports of blood, saliva, scat, hairs, and other forms of DNA that were found that came with the results of an unknown primate. However, a really good picture or a body will put the skepticism to rest. I'm a firm believer in Bigfoot and believe that they're definitely out there. For the longest time the Panda Bear was considered a myth until it was proven to be a real animal.

Footprints aren't going to prove anything anymore. People need to stop creating hoaxes and actually take this seriously. If a Bigfoot is found or the body of a Bigfoot is found, it will be the biggest reveal in scientific history as far as I'm concerned.

I'd like to believe but I think we need a body that's when it will be settled, a really good picture wont do anymore IMO since our technology can now make really good fakes. I'm hoping he/she's out there and we get some nice video evidence
 
i believe if there were yeties they are all dead by now.
 
You do know the guy who filmed this said he hoaxed it right?

No, he never admitted it was a hoax. You're confusing that with the man who confessed the famous picture of the lochness monster was a hoax. The Patterson film subject has never been proven to be a hoax.

The authenticity of the Patterson film subject is split. Some scientists say it's real and others say it's an elaborate hoax.
 
the pic is plenty convincing for me.
 
No, he never admitted it was a hoax. You're confusing that with the man who confessed the famous picture of the lochness monster was a hoax. The Patterson film subject has never been proven to be a hoax.

The authenticity of the Patterson film subject is split. Some scientists say it's real and others say it's an elaborate hoax.
one guy said that he played the bigfoot in that video
 
one guy said that he played the bigfoot in that video

Yes, I know who you speak of. No one knows if he's telling the truth since all attempts to recreate it have proven that it doesn't match what Bob H. says when it comes to the Patterson film subject.

Unfortunately it's all a "He said and did this" type of deal. However, Bob H. appears to want get his fifteen minutes of fame and when asked where's the suit he provides no answers and he's a proven liar to begin with. Many researchers and people close to Patterson maintain that Patterson didn't make this up.

As was stated before, the only way this debate will end is when a specimen is provided for examination. If what I provided is a suit then that is one muscular suit that shows clear muscle definition.
 
I live in the Cookson Hills of Oklahoma. There are supposed to be bigfoot here and on the Arkansas side of a nearby National Forest. There's lots of local stories. Some are BS, some sound kinda scary.
 
They are wise to hide. If we found them we would just wipe them out.

And thats the truth.
 
I'l believe in creatures like these when they find a corpse.
 
Peoples lives must be really boring in order to believe this tripe.
 
So Big Foot's real. What's that? A new species? Big deal. An animal is an animal.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"