Spider-Man 3 Official Thread for the Spider-Man 3 Footage on Heroes and NBC.com!

Found something interesting about the Sandman shot. Not sure if anyone has noted it yet.

sandman111tc2.png


See the wheel there? Could we assume he sucks up the surroundings to attain this transformation?
 
Found something interesting about the Sandman shot. Not sure if anyone has noted it yet.

sandman111tc2.png


See the wheel there? Could we assume he sucks up the surroundings to attain this transformation?

can we assume that spidey has a BIG problem here!!!!
 
I finally saw it. Amazing. Really cool aerial battle between peter and harry.

In the end, Venom sfx was better, but in some way it looked like some animated figure.

There was 1 particular shot that caught my intention, Peter web black webbing tied to his hand, struggling to get free. His other hand webbed to a construction pilar. Seems this is going to be a match where Spider-Man and Venom will really match their powers against each others.

and yeah, peter's spider-senses should have gone off... :-)
 
i thought this was interesting (sorry if posted)

Giant_Sandman.gif


look where he is standing, where peter is, look what he is on... ok?

now look at the end of the theatrical trailer, where venoms webbings are choking him.... notice how hes on the same pilar... that giant sandman will be at the battle royale

Of course Sandman will be at the battle royale, thats what the definition of battle royale is, 3 or more fighters. And he looks totally bad@$$, he still has all the stuff from the sewer still in him. I wonder how he gets rid of all that junk. Boy does he look pissed.
 
and yeah, peter's spider-senses should have gone off... :-)

Not you too.....it DID go off, keep your attention on Peter's face, when the scene opens he is smiling, but as Harry comes up behind him, the smile fades and his eyebrows raise.

If they had made it a dramatic Spider sense like in the last two it would probably would have taken from the surprise of Harry's attack.
 
ok i know that some effects are not finished. but for christ sake MJ's face here looks plastic. i dont care if you are a hardcore fan and that you will defend everything.look at here face. it is shiny.
Image35.jpg
 
I'm thinking it's cg but would like to see a gif animation of it in motion. Maybe it just looks fake in screencaps.
 
ok i know that some effects are not finished. but for christ sake MJ's face here looks plastic. i dont care if you are a hardcore fan and that you will defend everything.look at here face. it is shiny.
Image35.jpg
First off it's propably still in developement, yet secondly LOOK AT IT... That does NOT look bad at all, it looks really good! I can see it too, if you're really looking closely.. But fact of the matter is that it's a still.. and this was NEVER MENT to be seen in still-mode... it'll go by fast in the film, and when seeing it in full contenst, no one will think about it.
 
ok i know that some effects are not finished. but for christ sake MJ's face here looks plastic. i dont care if you are a hardcore fan and that you will defend everything.look at here face. it is shiny.
Image35.jpg

Now that I think about it, that picture could be AFTER the battle royale, so her face would be wet from crying. Because of the shot of her holding Harry's glove.
 
ok i know that some effects are not finished. but for christ sake MJ's face here looks plastic. i dont care if you are a hardcore fan and that you will defend everything.look at here face. it is shiny.
Image35.jpg

ooooooooo, all we need now is Hollywood and we have the next mannequin movie.
 
Btw I'm more of a superman fan but I have to say it's great to see how Raimi is layering the villains for Spidey in this 3rd installment. Weird, I didn't like the first Spidey movie that much. The second I thought was very good. I think the 3rd should top it :up: Congrats you guys have a winner :)
 
I see no problem with that MJ shot as a still or in motion. :huh:
 
^ Here's one for ya!... what exactly is it that you find fake about MJ's face in that pic? (even though I DO know that it's CG)... Try emagine that that shiny spot on her cheek isn't there! THAT'S what makes it look plastic-like! Look at the rest of her face... There's nothing to complain about!
 
It looks fake in stills. Would like to compare it to motion (animated gif, someone make one!)

Anyways overall I think it looks very good. There are some moments that I'd do differently action wise, but it's just inherently Raimi to do certain things. I mean he comes from the evil dead series so he's always going to want to put a little near slap stick fun in his action.

such as

SM_2.jpg


Would I do that? No. Would Raimi? Yep. It works in his context of filmmaking :up:
 
I see no problem with that MJ shot as a still or in motion. :huh:
That's because there's nothing to complain about... but with a movie that's looking this visually AMAZING, you gotta dig EXSTREMELY DEEP to find something to nit-pick about;)
 
Some people fail to realize that humans sweat and get oily...which makes people's face shiny. MJ went through a lot of crap...can she not sweat? It looks fine to me.
 
First off it's propably still in developement, yet secondly LOOK AT IT... That does NOT look bad at all, it looks really good! I can see it too, if you're really looking closely.. But fact of the matter is that it's a still.. and this was NEVER MENT to be seen in still-mode... it'll go by fast in the film, and when seeing it in full contenst, no one will think about it.
naite please stop :csad:

we are in march now. i would expect a cgi MJ without texture on her face maybe in december but not now. you have to understand that everything in this shot has texture. but not her face.

both are CGI IMO because if you look at motion there is no face movement. but i dont have a problem with this. its about the plastic look. its like we are in 1995 again :csad:

i saw some tobey close ups in the harry vs. peter fight. but this could also be filmed with tobey and kirsten :csad:
 
naite please stop :csad:

we are in march now. i would expect a cgi MJ without texture on her face maybe in december but not now. you have to understand that everything in this shot has texture. but not her face.

both are CGI IMO because if you look at motion there is no face movement. but i dont have a problem with this. its about the plastic look. its like we are in 1995 again :csad:

i saw some tobey close ups in the harry vs. peter fight. but this could also be filmed with tobey and kirsten :csad:
I honneslty think it looks great...
 
Thats gotta be CG, her face does look kinda plastic.

Lol of course it CG. You didn't honestly think KD was actually swinging with Tmags high above the city streets of NY did you?:huh: :csad:

Anyway, I wonder where MJ's shoes are? She must have realy been swept of her feet :oldrazz:
 
Spider-Girl™;11322381 said:
Not you too.....it DID go off, keep your attention on Peter's face, when the scene opens he is smiling, but as Harry comes up behind him, the smile fades and his eyebrows raise.

If they had made it a dramatic Spider sense like in the last two it would probably would have taken from the surprise of Harry's attack.

no it didn't you LIAR!

all he did was go from smiling to a normal face mode you'd be in when you're riding a motorcycle down the street. he even has the VERY SAME dull look on his face as harry is grabbing him.

and your so called raised eyebrow was raised all throughout the clip, even when he was smiling.


dramatic spider sense takes away from the suprise of harry's attack? hmmmm, what about the scene in SM2 with the car through the window, did the sense take away? what about the ending of Sm1, did the sense take away? not really.
 
The question is... Why would you even CGI a shot like that???????????????????????????????????????????? It is not necessary. They could do that shot in front of a green screen with no problem. It's just them swinging.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"