Photographs................of GHOSTS!

Kevin Roegele

Do you mind if I don't?
Joined
May 2, 2000
Messages
23,882
Reaction score
76
Points
73
ghost_on_stairs_lg.jpg


This is................whooooooooooa creepy. Taken in the National Maritime Museum in Greenwich, England in 1966. Supposedly a very haunted place. Experts have always stated this is a genuine photo with no tampering.







The next one is even creepier....

















fire_girl_lg.jpg


Taken in 1995 when Wem Hall in Shropshire (where I'm from) burned to the ground. None of the staff, locals or firefighters saw a girl there when it happened.

Makes you shudder, doesn't it?



best_baby_lg.jpg


How about this? Taken by the grave of a girl who died when she was 17 by her mother. The mother didn't recognise the ghostly child but it was later found the graves of two babies were near by.
 
The one in the top looks like she/he is falling down the stairs!

"Doh... not again!"
 
The first two look like they are just actual people there, the last looks very photoshopped, it's easy to create that effect with a simple vector mask
 
When these photos supposedly depict ghosts, why do they have clothes on?
Did their clothes have a soul and die as well?

:rolleyes:
 
Wilhelm-Scream said:
When these photos supposedly depict ghosts, why do they have clothes on?
Did their clothes have a soul and die as well?

:rolleyes:
Their shoes have soles ;)
 
I find Kevin's avatar more amusing than those pictures.:(
 
Wilhelm-Scream said:
When these photos supposedly depict ghosts, why do they have clothes on?
Did their clothes have a soul and die as well?

:rolleyes:


Because theyre paranormal.:confused: :confused: :confused:
 
Kevin Roegele said:
ghost_on_stairs_lg.jpg


This is................whooooooooooa creepy. Taken in the National Maritime Museum in Greenwich, England in 1966. Supposedly a very haunted place. Experts have always stated this is a genuine photo with no tampering.







The next one is even creepier....

















fire_girl_lg.jpg


Taken in 1995 when Wem Hall in Shropshire (where I'm from) burned to the ground. None of the staff, locals or firefighters saw a girl there when it happened.

Makes you shudder, doesn't it?



best_baby_lg.jpg


How about this? Taken by the grave of a girl who died when she was 17 by her mother. The mother didn't recognise the ghostly child but it was later found the graves of two babies were near by.


ray.jpg
 
Darthphere said:
Because theyre paranormal.:confused: :confused: :confused:
so whatever you're wearing when you die appears as part of your ectoplasmic body?
COOL!
If that's the case, when I'm dying of lung cancer I'm going to dress up in a wild pimp suit with a giant white fur coat and a peacock feather in my wide-brimmed hat with Bootsy Collins glasses.

That way when I wander the Earth ('cause there's no way I'm buying into that "Go into the light" scam) I'll be like a Super-Fly Pimp Ghost.:up:
 
Wilhelm-Scream said:
When these photos supposedly depict ghosts, why do they have clothes on?
Did their clothes have a soul and die as well?

:rolleyes:

Good point, why are there not more naked ghosts? It's always 'A woman in victorian dress' or some shiz
 
Wilhelm-Scream said:
so whatever you're wearing when you die appears as part of your ectoplasmic body?
COOL!
If that's the case, when I'm dying of lung cancer I'm going to dress up in a wild pimp suit with a giant white fur coat and a peacock feather in my wide-brimmed hat with Bootsy Collins glasses.

That way when I wander the Earth ('cause there's no way I'm buying into that "Go into the light" scam) I'll be like a Super-Fly Pimp Ghost.:up:


Go for it.:up:
 
I remember HWD, Fuzz and I watched this live cam of a ghost hunters TV show going through a haunted castle. The camera I was watching was like the basement camera, and I thought there was a ghosthunter running around in his bathrobe with a white (I thought it was bandaged like Invisible Man style) face that was twitchy ALA Fight Club. Turns out that like it was the only find of the night. Creepy ****. :o
 
I always thought Roegele was very intelligent.
Has he never heard of Double Exposure?:confused:
Or has this all been a test? To smoke out and mock the gullible?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"