Promising Young Woman

Asr

Sidekick
Joined
Oct 5, 2004
Messages
3,481
Reaction score
1,204
Points
103
Been very interested in seeing this since I saw the trailer earlier in October. I love these kinds of "edgy" movies that pull no punches. Apparently it's going to get a theatrical release first on Christmas Day alongside WW84, and then a streaming release in January: 'Promising Young Woman' Sets Christmas Day Release in Theaters - Variety

Longer article about the movie, including an interview with the director: Promising Young Woman: Carey Mulligan, Emerald Fennell on the Thriller - Variety

Chris Stuckmann just reviewed the movie today on his channel, but I figure you guys know where to look for that. ;)
 
Trailer caught my attention earlier in the year before it had it's release delayed but yeah, this looks fun.
 
I saw that and I am literally in shock, because I dont know which side I support.
IIII goes too far to support the main character any longer for me. She tries to torture a guy on the bachelor party and he tries to defend himself and kills her. Which is to be honest... completly okay for me because with that behavior she is on the same page like exploiting drunken girls. As a guy who... had a comparable situation that was very hard to even watch.
Im wondering which message audience has to catch up here.
 
Saw this yesterday. I think I need to give it two ratings, one for concept and one for execution: 9/10 for concept, but 4/10 for execution.

I have two main complaints with it:

1. IMO it's not written that well because we're not really given any reason to understand the motivations of the lead female character played by Carey Mulligan. I mean, Mulligan does really well with what she's given, but she's not actually given very much. The film is never specifically clear on exactly why she's doing what she's doing. And a pivotal scene that actually goes into what happened in the past only plays the audio from the event, rather than showing anything visual. If we're (as an audience) supposed to empathize with Mulligan's character, we need something more than that and shown early on in the film. Something like a flashback (blurred out to avoid showing the "worst" parts) would've been far more effective. As it is, the majority of her motivation just wasn't there, and way too much storytelling was implied. The film doesn't even specifically acknowledge that Cassie's friend was raped until after it's more than halfway through.

Also, for a film about a leading character that actually affected the character's friend, there was a big disconnect between those two characters. It really needed to show the friend character in some way.

2. It was also a bit....tame, considering what the trailers seemed to suggest. The opening scene with Adam Brody's character cut away just when it seemed like it was going to get interesting. I wanted to know what happened right after that cut, but the film never returned to it, leaving it to the audience's imagination. Other "interactions" with other guys also just abruptly cut off, and left too much to the imagination of Cassie's character. The film certainly implied that she'd been doing the drunk act for a while, but never made it clear how "far" she was going in these previous encounters. Was she always just talking to these guys and giving them a piece of her mind? Or getting physically violent with them too? Even in one of the final scenes when we think Cassie is finally going to get violent with a certain guy, she doesn't.

For a film that was rated R, I was actually expecting more violence, edginess, and "bite" from the film that it could've delivered, but just didn't. Honestly I'm not sure why it got rated R even, because it sure seemed like it could've gotten away with PG-13.

Still an interesting and provocative film nonetheless, but I was expecting more from it, which better writing could've solved.
 
I thought it was pretty good but the ending made me feel bad more than it made me feel good.
 
Yeah I get what they were going for with the end but I still felt like they could have found a different way of going about it. Not sure whether I would say I liked it or not. I also agree that it was frustrating not know exactly what she did at the end of all these encounters.
 
I saw that and I am literally in shock, because I dont know which side I support.
IIII goes too far to support the main character any longer for me. She tries to torture a guy on the bachelor party and he tries to defend himself and kills her. Which is to be honest... completly okay for me because with that behavior she is on the same page like exploiting drunken girls. As a guy who... had a comparable situation that was very hard to even watch.
Im wondering which message audience has to catch up here.
I completely disagree. Murder was not justified. But he will most likely get off and have a reduced sentenced once it comes out that Cassie regularly seduced men to torture them. I enjoyed the performances from a very stacked cast.

I wish we had got confirmation though that she sent the video out to everyone Ryan knew. It left it too open ended.
 
I thought it was pretty interesting that they cast non-threatening looking and comedic actors as the sketchy dudes.
 
It was definitely on purpose to cast guys like Adam Brody or Bo Burnham who have reputations for being harmless “nice” guys to show people change when they don’t think they’ll get caught.
 
Surprised to see people being conflicted about whose side they’re own because I was definitely on Cassie’s side. She was only just scaring guys and teaching them a lesson. She even only scared her classmate and the dean and didn’t actually put anyone in physical danger other than Chris Lowell’s character which you know… torture’s not great but you can kinda see why she lost it there. And he may have acted in self defence but that still doesn’t justify murder or what he did in the past.

And I thought the audio alone was bad and haunting enough. Do not need visuals to go along with that scene.

One thing I really liked was that Cassie wasn’t really enjoying her revenge spree. It was just something she felt like she needed to do but it was messing up her life really badly and it wasn’t vidicated. Also, the commentary about “nice guys” becoming predatory when given the chance was great too. Even Bo Burnham’s character who if I remember right technically didn’t do anything bad but was present at the party, saw what was happening, didn’t try to put a stop to it, didn’t open up about it afterwards because maybe he thought it wasn’t a big deal or to protect himself and his friends and therefore was still complicit in what happened to Nina afterwards. He even lied to the police about the bachelor party knowing that Cassie was missing because he knew if that video came out, it would affect his career and his life. He’s a “good guy” until being good affects him negatively. Which is just like… damn.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"