Spidey-Bat said:EDIT: I didn't realize this was a "timed-exclusive". Wikipedia only had Wii in the info box and that was the only thing I noticed. Anyway, the graphics are still very good. You're too particular about graphics in games. Try enjoying playing it more than about how it looks.
this sounds like a japanese person said thisZenien said:You statement have me curious as to its meaning...
A Wii port isn't the best indicator of graphical differences.TheGrayGhost said:When I see comparison screen shots of the graphics of each of the respective systems, I don't notice any of the differences that a hardcore gamer would otherwise detect. It's all the same to me. So when people argue about the power of a system, I cannot help but give a little chuckle.
...Yeah.
WhatsHisFace said:A Wii port isn't the best indicator of graphical differences.
I agree that there are far too few games showing off the next-gen power, but there are plenty on the way like Dead Rising, Splinter Cell 4, Lost Planet, Gears of War, Too Human, Mass Effect, Alan Wake and Bioshock to start raising the standard.Manny Calavera said:I actually agree with you. Originally I thought Wii was going to be murdered graphically (which is ok, no one was buying it for it's horsepower anyways), but if developers remain intent on just putting out xbox-level graphics on the 360 and ps3, which is what they've been doing since we first started seeing games from those two, then I doubt a difference in power will even be noticed, which is sad considering how weak the Wii is compared to those two.