Rayman Raving Rabbids Wii Info and Images

IM getting a Wii...it's starting line up has been incredible so far, and the graphics ain't too shabby

And Ill be getting this game, just because the whole style is awesome, the gameplay looks like it will be great, and it looks like it will be funny without even using crude humor :O

The videos for this game are great :O
 
Spidey-Bat said:
EDIT: I didn't realize this was a "timed-exclusive". Wikipedia only had Wii in the info box and that was the only thing I noticed. Anyway, the graphics are still very good. You're too particular about graphics in games. Try enjoying playing it more than about how it looks.

When I see comparison screen shots of the graphics of each of the respective systems, I don't notice any of the differences that a hardcore gamer would otherwise detect. It's all the same to me. So when people argue about the power of a system, I cannot help but give a little chuckle.

...Yeah.
 
I learned stuff from a lot of complaints on here, I only noticed Jaggies in the screen shots :(
 
Try as I might, I just cant figure out what the hell this game is about. But I did like the n64 rayman game, so I suppose this is at least a rental.
 
The game is about a species of insane, underground rabbits that decide they want to take over the world and Rayman has to stop them.
 
I'm not really getting a Wii for this sort of game, but it looks decent I guess.
 
Zenien said:
You statement have me curious as to its meaning...
this sounds like a japanese person said this
 
RAYMAN sucks :don

But this does look pretty cool.
 
does anyone have any gifs of those "bunnies can't ______" trailers for the game?

more specifically the new 'bunnies can't vacuum" one?

where he looks at the vacuum, them holds up a duster and screams?

i'd appreciate it.
 
np1.JPG


np2.JPG
 
TheGrayGhost said:
When I see comparison screen shots of the graphics of each of the respective systems, I don't notice any of the differences that a hardcore gamer would otherwise detect. It's all the same to me. So when people argue about the power of a system, I cannot help but give a little chuckle.

...Yeah.
A Wii port isn't the best indicator of graphical differences.
 
WhatsHisFace said:
A Wii port isn't the best indicator of graphical differences.

But I'm not exclusively referring to Rayman, but to ALL of the screenshots of various games I've seen. To me, they all look the same. Not that it matters.

But I do hope that future consoles will make advances beyond just graphics and media synergy; they aren't that important anymore, I don't think.
 
I actually agree with you. Originally I thought Wii was going to be murdered graphically (which is ok, no one was buying it for it's horsepower anyways), but if developers remain intent on just putting out xbox-level graphics on the 360 and ps3, which is what they've been doing since we first started seeing games from those two, then I doubt a difference in power will even be noticed, which is sad considering how weak the Wii is compared to those two.
 
Manny Calavera said:
I actually agree with you. Originally I thought Wii was going to be murdered graphically (which is ok, no one was buying it for it's horsepower anyways), but if developers remain intent on just putting out xbox-level graphics on the 360 and ps3, which is what they've been doing since we first started seeing games from those two, then I doubt a difference in power will even be noticed, which is sad considering how weak the Wii is compared to those two.
I agree that there are far too few games showing off the next-gen power, but there are plenty on the way like Dead Rising, Splinter Cell 4, Lost Planet, Gears of War, Too Human, Mass Effect, Alan Wake and Bioshock to start raising the standard.

For now, we at least have Oblivion and Ghost Recon.
 
Even though the Wii isn't going to be the powerhouse of the other systems, those graphics are still really good.:up:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"