We're two writers that have decided to take on the task of writing an alternate "Spider-Man 3" screenplay. While we respect the original film for what it is, it would prove for a fun experience to try and construct a new movie using our knowledge of what worked and what didn't while at the same time, taking the story in a new direction.
This is a place for brainstorming ideas during the process and contribution from members is always appreciated. We will post our work as we go. Thanks for your interest, and keep reading.
adamlee and englishtrebor
Well, it's nice to know you aren't trashing the original and while I do see how it suffered (mainly due to time cuts) I find the idea pretty neat. I suggest incorporating some of the ideas originally presented for the third installment, like splitting into a two movie experience or just going for that 4-5 hour film screenplay.
Obviously, as any good story teller will tell you, one must have significant build up to the actual plot of the film. I suggest for the first act, like previous done in the first two motion pictures, show us what Parker's life is like. Hes got everything hes ever wanted, the chick, relatively good working conditions, and popularity as Spider-Man. While handling this happier Peter Parker it is important to showcase how even without the symbiot to corrupt him those intentions in his heart were always there, fundamentally what Im saying is, the symbiot only brings out whats already there. If you studied the actual theatrical cut of this film you will find that Peter wasnt really supporting or trying to understand Mary-Jane, he thought he could write it off with comparisons to his dual-identity as Spider-Man, what sort of husband does that?
Next up is the relationship between Harry and Peter, which I felt was the best handled of the storylines in the film so I really dont have much to suggest here.
On the subject of Flint Marko, give him the fifteen minutes he deserves, not the fifteen seconds he sadly got due to the big, black shoehorn. The novel really delved into his personal story and struggles so I suggest doing some studying there as well, so that in the end his character can be given the resolution he deserves. If you want to go for the two film route then I suggest that the subway battle be moved towards the end of part one to serve as an alternate way of snapping Parker back into reality, or at least to end his story for the first film so that further concentration can be given to Brocks story, which, then again, wont exactly be worth much if Peter drops the suit after killing Sandman.
Next up, the Stacey clan, honestly it might be best to just drop them completely. What roles will this play in your screenplay? Ask yourself that and make it worthwhile.
Following suit, Edward Brock Junior, what role does he play in your screen play? In the theatrical cut of the film he is a pathetic and antithesis to Parker and Spider-Man and Peter David even took the character so far in his novelization to make him a stalker of young Miss Stacey. I suggest ending the first half with the church scene and finally ending the film with the transformation. In fact, you could make the jazz club scene out as Parker celebrating his killing of Marko at the subway battle, things proceed like they did with theatrical cut, Parker winds up knocking over MJ, this snaps him back into reality, he goes rips off suit, etc.
Next up if your friendly neighborhood
symbiot??? The symbiot will obviously play a big part in the overall story. The symbiot is a parasite and a catalyst and when it is reject by the hateful Parker it comes across another man, one filled with much more rage and hate. When this man and the symbiot form they form a physical representation of the monster within his heart, one that doesnt see himself as a hero but as a victim (which would explain why he has those fangs when Spider-Man didnt, for he still saw himself as the good guy).
At this point, this is all I have to suggest.