I hope they haven't forgotten that Tessa Thompson's character is gradually going deaf.
The premise is a little lame to me. Like some perceived notion that Apollo Creed's son beating Ivan Drago's son somehow redeems the death of his father in the ring or vanquishes some sort of inner demon. I'm sorry but it's nonsense.
The premise is a little lame to me. Like some perceived notion that Apollo Creed's son beating Ivan Drago's son somehow redeems the death of his father in the ring or vanquishes some sort of inner demon. I'm sorry but it's nonsense.
To be fair a major part of the Adonis Creed character is his daddy issues and Apollo's legacy.
Adonis wanting to beat a Drago would mean mean something to the character given what we know of him.
We don't know how Dolph's Ivan plays a part in the story either yet.
The story could be corny. It all depends on the execution.
But that's the thing, he's making it about his father's death but his step-mom calls him out on in it in the trailer that this is not about his father. Most likely his own ego.
If you had asked me, "what's one of the worst things they could do in the Creed franchise?" I'm pretty sure that I would have proposed this exact scenario....
Introducing a young Drago is one of the most dumb and lazy choices they could have gone with. One of the most predictable too... it was the devil in the box.
What a disappointment.
It makes this fight more personal for Creed. There hasnt been a memorable opponent since Drago really.
It makes this fight more personal for Creed. There hasnt been a memorable opponent since Drago really.
It makes this fight more personal for Creed. There hasnt been a memorable opponent since Drago really.
How is it personal? Drago Jr. had nothing to do with it. Also, it wasn't like Drago murdered his father. Drago didn't want to "kill" Apollo.