• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Senator Lieberman: America should strongly consider bombing Iran

Do you agree with Senator Lieberman?

  • Yes, bombing Tehran, Iran should be considered

  • No, are you crazy?


Results are only viewable after voting.
He is so freaking hideous.
Imagine his face on currency.
It'd be so sick.
 
He's the son of a **** who tried to ban Mortal Kombat! :down:down
 
So we really should just forget all about possibly standing up to Iran?

Well it did work with Hitler...
 
So we really should just forget all about possibly standing up to Iran?

Well it did work with Hitler...

I think it would be good if they gave us like....oh, I dunno.....a REAL freakin' reason to bomb them before we went ahead and decided that all other possible approaches to resolution had been exhausted. We're a long ways off from any of that by my estimation. Not to mention that we don't have the financial or manpower resources to fight the battles in Afghanistan, Iraq AND Iran that we seem to be bristling about maintaining or starting.

jag
 
I think it would be good if they gave us like....oh, I dunno.....a REAL freakin' reason to bomb them before we went ahead and decided that all other possible approaches to resolution had been exhausted. We're a long ways off from any of that by my estimation. Not to mention that we don't have the financial or manpower resources to fight the battles in Afghanistan, Iraq AND Iran that we seem to be bristling about maintaining or starting.

jag

Lieberman is not saying bomb them tomorrow - Lieberman is saying we have to keep it on the table. That is certainly not unreasonable.
 
Dude!
We can't have CARTOONS depicting decapitations, mutilations, disembowelments, etc.! :mad:

That's just for real life Iranians! :mad:
The humane thing to do, after all, is bomb them into submission. Let's have some decency.

Seriously Lieberman is one of the least relevant people.
 
joesleazeball.jpg
 
Lieberman is not saying bomb them tomorrow - Lieberman is saying we have to keep it on the table. That is certainly not unreasonable.


Errrr.....he is pretty much saying let's bomb them tomorrow because he suspects they're training Iraqi insurgents in Iran. That is NOT a valid reason to go bomb another country, IMHO.

jag
 
Joe, no body cares about you anymore...so just kindly stop talking.
 
I pretty much ignore everything he says at this point. There's a reason he was basically kicked out of the democratic party (Which is kind of funny considering he had the democratic VP nomination 8 year ago). I just hope Connecticut voters have the good sense to kick him to the curb next go around.
 
is he accusing the iranian government of sponsoring the terrorists that might have trained in or come from iran? if there's proof that that happened then i think the iranian government needs to pay for that, but if there's no proof then bombing them is a terrible idea. it's like us bombing saudi arabia since 15 of the 9/11 bombers were from there.
 
So we really should just forget all about possibly standing up to Iran?

Well it did work with Hitler...

Didn't China support the Viet Cong?

What would've been the best solution then? Start a full blown war with China?

I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that would've made a bad situation worse.
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"