I had seen season 1, but then lost Showtime so I have never seen season 2 of The Tudors. I know, I know. I missed the epic, tragic Boleyn saga's finale. But I have read much of it and seen the wonderful Anne of a Thousand Days (and the terrible Other Boleyn Girl), so I get the gist.
Anyway, by coincidence I was able to see seasons 3 and up to episode 7 of season 4 of the Tudors this last week.
I have to say, the show has aged pretty well into the non-Boleyn years and much of the luridness or sensationalism of the first season is gone. I have enjoyed it.
Most of all I I would just like to compliment on the show showing Henry for what a bastard he is. He is not the romantic hero of Anne of a Thousand Days or the laughable "victim" of that trashy movie from a few years ago. He is a weak, selfish, shortsighted king whose major successes were accidents and whose legacy is defined by his blood baths and ridiculously high number of marriages.
Henry Cavill has grown into a much better actor from the first season and portrays Brandon with a sort of weary weight of a man who has grown disillusioned with his king's rather evil tendencies. His shame and remorse, even for the Boleyns and Queen Katherine, are very surprisingly moving. As was Thomas Cromwell's death. He may have been a prideful, ambitious man who had many people executed, but at least he believed in something and was leaving a profound legacy in the Reformation that rewrote Christian history forevermore. To Henry, a still-practicing Catholic, it was a means to an end and again shows his inability to love anything but himself.
As for season 4. I am surprised at the amount of hate Katherine Howard has received. Was she a silly, mindless flighty girl? Yes. She was also a 17-year-old TEENAGER married off to a 40-50-ish Henry VIII who in reality was far less handsome than Rhys-Meyers.
And especially given her dubious background, Henry was an idiot full of lust to marry her and brought it on himself. And again he executes her for things he himself did to all his wives (adultery), so I felt sympathy for her when she was running through the halls begging for mercy and sanctuary and took a good deal of satisfaction out of her being the only person executed on the show (and there have been A LOT) who didn't suck up to Henry, but rather insulted him in her final words. Which apparently did happen. That makes her A-OK in my book.
Catherine Parr is far more worthy to be Queen and is a good match for Henry. Probably the first good one since Seymour or even Boleyn as unlike 3-5, she can actually stand up and push back her King (though not as dangerously as Anne did).
And the last thing I'l say is this show has made Mary Tudor far more likable and sympathetic than I ever thought possible. The young actress who plays her is very good, endearing, pretty, etc. But there is such pathos to her that if she had found love at an earlier age or if Henry had actually been trying to make her life happier and being a good father instead of always looking for hs next wife and/or conquest....she may not have grown into the bitter woman and terrible queen she became many years later. Albeit, she was not nearly as bloody (or as hypocritical) as Henry was in season 3, so there you go.
Good show. Glad I'll be there for the end and will look for season 2 on DVD at some point as well.